From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> Date: 2024-06-04 21:28:54
While working on the function_graph multiple users code, I realized
that I was struggling with how the ftrace code worked. Being the
author of such code meant that it wasn't very intuitive. Namely, the
function names were not descriptive enough, or at least, they needed
comments.
This series moves to solve some of that via changing a couple function
names and parameters and adding comments to many of them.
There's more to do, but this at least moves it in the right direction.
Steven Rostedt (Google) (5):
ftrace: Rename dup_hash() and comment it
ftrace: Comment __ftrace_hash_rec_update() and make filter_hash bool
ftrace: Remove "filter_hash" parameter from ftrace_hash_rec_disable/enable()
ftrace: Convert "filter_hash" and "inc" to bool in ftrace_hash_rec_update_modify()
ftrace: Add comments to ftrace_hash_move() and friends
----
kernel/trace/ftrace.c | 103 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
1 file changed, 86 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> Date: 2024-06-04 21:28:54
From: "Steven Rostedt (Google)" <rostedt@goodmis.org>
The function __ftrace_hash_rec_update() parameter "filter_hash" is only
used for true or false (boolean), but is of type int. It already has an
"inc" parameter that is boolean. This is confusing, make "filter_hash"
boolean as well.
While at it, add some documentation to that function especially since it
holds the guts of the filtering logic of ftrace.
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (Google) <rostedt@goodmis.org>
---
kernel/trace/ftrace.c | 14 +++++++++++++-
1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> Date: 2024-06-04 21:28:54
From: "Steven Rostedt (Google)" <rostedt@goodmis.org>
The name "dup_hash()" is a misnomer as it does not duplicate the hash that
is passed in, but instead moves its entities from that hash to a newly
allocated one. Rename it to "__move_hash()" (using starting underscores as
it is an internal function), and add some comments about what it does.
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (Google) <rostedt@goodmis.org>
---
kernel/trace/ftrace.c | 8 ++++++--
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> Date: 2024-06-04 21:28:54
From: "Steven Rostedt (Google)" <rostedt@goodmis.org>
The functions ftrace_hash_rec_disable() and ftrace_hash_rec_enable()
always has 1 passed to its "ftrace_hash" parameter. Remove the parameter
and pass in true to __ftrace_hash_rec_update().
Also add some comments to both those functions explaining what they do.
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (Google) <rostedt@goodmis.org>
---
kernel/trace/ftrace.c | 24 ++++++++++++++++--------
1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
@@ -3062,7 +3070,7 @@ int ftrace_startup(struct ftrace_ops *ops, int command)returnret;}-if(ftrace_hash_rec_enable(ops,1))+if(ftrace_hash_rec_enable(ops))command|=FTRACE_UPDATE_CALLS;ftrace_startup_enable(command);
@@ -3104,7 +3112,7 @@ int ftrace_shutdown(struct ftrace_ops *ops, int command)/* Disabling ipmodify never fails */ftrace_hash_ipmodify_disable(ops);-if(ftrace_hash_rec_disable(ops,1))+if(ftrace_hash_rec_disable(ops))command|=FTRACE_UPDATE_CALLS;ops->flags&=~FTRACE_OPS_FL_ENABLED;
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> Date: 2024-06-04 21:28:54
From: "Steven Rostedt (Google)" <rostedt@goodmis.org>
The parameters "filter_hash" and "inc" in the function
ftrace_hash_rec_update_modify() are boolean. Change them to be such.
Also add documentation to what the function does.
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (Google) <rostedt@goodmis.org>
---
kernel/trace/ftrace.c | 33 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
1 file changed, 28 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> Date: 2024-06-04 21:28:54
From: "Steven Rostedt (Google)" <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Describe what ftrace_hash_move() does and add some more comments to some
other functions to make it easier to understand.
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (Google) <rostedt@goodmis.org>
---
kernel/trace/ftrace.c | 24 +++++++++++++++++++++++-
1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
@@ -169,6 +169,7 @@ static inline void ftrace_ops_init(struct ftrace_ops *ops)#endif}+/* Call this function for when a callback filters on set_ftrace_pid */staticvoidftrace_pid_func(unsignedlongip,unsignedlongparent_ip,structftrace_ops*op,structftrace_regs*fregs){
@@ -1317,7 +1318,7 @@ static struct ftrace_hash *alloc_ftrace_hash(int size_bits)returnhash;}-+/* Used to save filters on functions for modules not loaded yet */staticintftrace_add_mod(structtrace_array*tr,constchar*func,constchar*module,intenable)
@@ -1431,6 +1432,7 @@ static struct ftrace_hash *__move_hash(struct ftrace_hash *src, int size)returnnew_hash;}+/* Move the @src entries to a newly allocated hash */staticstructftrace_hash*__ftrace_hash_move(structftrace_hash*src){
From: kernel test robot <hidden> Date: 2024-06-05 01:13:21
Hi Steven,
kernel test robot noticed the following build errors:
[auto build test ERROR on akpm-mm/mm-everything]
[also build test ERROR on linus/master v6.10-rc2 next-20240604]
[If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information]
url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Steven-Rostedt/ftrace-Rename-dup_hash-and-comment-it/20240605-053138
base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/mm.git mm-everything
patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240604212855.046127611%40goodmis.org
patch subject: [PATCH 4/5] ftrace: Convert "filter_hash" and "inc" to bool in ftrace_hash_rec_update_modify()
config: s390-defconfig (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240605/202406050838.7r32JzDI-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: clang version 19.0.0git (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project d7d2d4f53fc79b4b58e8d8d08151b577c3699d4a)
reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240605/202406050838.7r32JzDI-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)
If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot [off-list ref]
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202406050838.7r32JzDI-lkp@intel.com/
All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
In file included from kernel/trace/ftrace.c:17:
In file included from include/linux/stop_machine.h:5:
In file included from include/linux/cpu.h:17:
In file included from include/linux/node.h:18:
In file included from include/linux/device.h:32:
In file included from include/linux/device/driver.h:21:
In file included from include/linux/module.h:19:
In file included from include/linux/elf.h:6:
In file included from arch/s390/include/asm/elf.h:173:
In file included from arch/s390/include/asm/mmu_context.h:11:
In file included from arch/s390/include/asm/pgalloc.h:18:
In file included from include/linux/mm.h:2245:
include/linux/vmstat.h:484:43: warning: arithmetic between different enumeration types ('enum zone_stat_item' and 'enum numa_stat_item') [-Wenum-enum-conversion]
484 | return vmstat_text[NR_VM_ZONE_STAT_ITEMS +
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ^
485 | item];
| ~~~~
include/linux/vmstat.h:491:43: warning: arithmetic between different enumeration types ('enum zone_stat_item' and 'enum numa_stat_item') [-Wenum-enum-conversion]
491 | return vmstat_text[NR_VM_ZONE_STAT_ITEMS +
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ^
492 | NR_VM_NUMA_EVENT_ITEMS +
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
include/linux/vmstat.h:498:36: warning: arithmetic between different enumeration types ('enum node_stat_item' and 'enum lru_list') [-Wenum-enum-conversion]
498 | return node_stat_name(NR_LRU_BASE + lru) + 3; // skip "nr_"
| ~~~~~~~~~~~ ^ ~~~
include/linux/vmstat.h:503:43: warning: arithmetic between different enumeration types ('enum zone_stat_item' and 'enum numa_stat_item') [-Wenum-enum-conversion]
503 | return vmstat_text[NR_VM_ZONE_STAT_ITEMS +
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ^
504 | NR_VM_NUMA_EVENT_ITEMS +
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
include/linux/vmstat.h:512:43: warning: arithmetic between different enumeration types ('enum zone_stat_item' and 'enum numa_stat_item') [-Wenum-enum-conversion]
512 | return vmstat_text[NR_VM_ZONE_STAT_ITEMS +
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ^
513 | NR_VM_NUMA_EVENT_ITEMS +
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
In file included from kernel/trace/ftrace.c:18:
In file included from include/linux/clocksource.h:22:
In file included from arch/s390/include/asm/io.h:93:
include/asm-generic/io.h:548:31: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
548 | val = __raw_readb(PCI_IOBASE + addr);
| ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
include/asm-generic/io.h:561:61: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
561 | val = __le16_to_cpu((__le16 __force)__raw_readw(PCI_IOBASE + addr));
| ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
include/uapi/linux/byteorder/big_endian.h:37:59: note: expanded from macro '__le16_to_cpu'
37 | #define __le16_to_cpu(x) __swab16((__force __u16)(__le16)(x))
| ^
include/uapi/linux/swab.h:102:54: note: expanded from macro '__swab16'
102 | #define __swab16(x) (__u16)__builtin_bswap16((__u16)(x))
| ^
In file included from kernel/trace/ftrace.c:18:
In file included from include/linux/clocksource.h:22:
In file included from arch/s390/include/asm/io.h:93:
include/asm-generic/io.h:574:61: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
574 | val = __le32_to_cpu((__le32 __force)__raw_readl(PCI_IOBASE + addr));
| ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
include/uapi/linux/byteorder/big_endian.h:35:59: note: expanded from macro '__le32_to_cpu'
35 | #define __le32_to_cpu(x) __swab32((__force __u32)(__le32)(x))
| ^
include/uapi/linux/swab.h:115:54: note: expanded from macro '__swab32'
115 | #define __swab32(x) (__u32)__builtin_bswap32((__u32)(x))
| ^
In file included from kernel/trace/ftrace.c:18:
In file included from include/linux/clocksource.h:22:
In file included from arch/s390/include/asm/io.h:93:
include/asm-generic/io.h:585:33: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
585 | __raw_writeb(value, PCI_IOBASE + addr);
| ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
include/asm-generic/io.h:595:59: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
595 | __raw_writew((u16 __force)cpu_to_le16(value), PCI_IOBASE + addr);
| ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
include/asm-generic/io.h:605:59: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
605 | __raw_writel((u32 __force)cpu_to_le32(value), PCI_IOBASE + addr);
| ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
include/asm-generic/io.h:693:20: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
693 | readsb(PCI_IOBASE + addr, buffer, count);
| ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
include/asm-generic/io.h:701:20: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
701 | readsw(PCI_IOBASE + addr, buffer, count);
| ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
include/asm-generic/io.h:709:20: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
709 | readsl(PCI_IOBASE + addr, buffer, count);
| ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
include/asm-generic/io.h:718:21: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
718 | writesb(PCI_IOBASE + addr, buffer, count);
| ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
include/asm-generic/io.h:727:21: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
727 | writesw(PCI_IOBASE + addr, buffer, count);
| ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
include/asm-generic/io.h:736:21: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
736 | writesl(PCI_IOBASE + addr, buffer, count);
| ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
quoted
kernel/trace/ftrace.c:1961:13: error: conflicting types for 'ftrace_hash_rec_disable_modify'
1961 | static void ftrace_hash_rec_disable_modify(struct ftrace_ops *ops,
| ^
kernel/trace/ftrace.c:1384:1: note: previous declaration is here
1384 | ftrace_hash_rec_disable_modify(struct ftrace_ops *ops, int filter_hash);
| ^
quoted
kernel/trace/ftrace.c:1967:13: error: conflicting types for 'ftrace_hash_rec_enable_modify'
1967 | static void ftrace_hash_rec_enable_modify(struct ftrace_ops *ops,
| ^
kernel/trace/ftrace.c:1386:1: note: previous declaration is here
1386 | ftrace_hash_rec_enable_modify(struct ftrace_ops *ops, int filter_hash);
| ^
17 warnings and 2 errors generated.
vim +/ftrace_hash_rec_disable_modify +1961 kernel/trace/ftrace.c
84261912ebee412 Steven Rostedt (Red Hat 2014-08-18 1960)
84261912ebee412 Steven Rostedt (Red Hat 2014-08-18 @1961) static void ftrace_hash_rec_disable_modify(struct ftrace_ops *ops,
5177364f840058a Steven Rostedt (Google 2024-06-04 1962) bool filter_hash)
84261912ebee412 Steven Rostedt (Red Hat 2014-08-18 1963) {
5177364f840058a Steven Rostedt (Google 2024-06-04 1964) ftrace_hash_rec_update_modify(ops, filter_hash, false);
84261912ebee412 Steven Rostedt (Red Hat 2014-08-18 1965) }
84261912ebee412 Steven Rostedt (Red Hat 2014-08-18 1966)
84261912ebee412 Steven Rostedt (Red Hat 2014-08-18 @1967) static void ftrace_hash_rec_enable_modify(struct ftrace_ops *ops,
5177364f840058a Steven Rostedt (Google 2024-06-04 1968) bool filter_hash)
84261912ebee412 Steven Rostedt (Red Hat 2014-08-18 1969) {
5177364f840058a Steven Rostedt (Google 2024-06-04 1970) ftrace_hash_rec_update_modify(ops, filter_hash, true);
84261912ebee412 Steven Rostedt (Red Hat 2014-08-18 1971) }
84261912ebee412 Steven Rostedt (Red Hat 2014-08-18 1972)
--
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki
kernel/trace/ftrace.c:1961:13: warning: 'ftrace_hash_rec_disable_modify' defined but not used [-Wunused-function]
1961 | static void ftrace_hash_rec_disable_modify(struct ftrace_ops *ops,
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
vim +1961 kernel/trace/ftrace.c
84261912ebee41 Steven Rostedt (Red Hat 2014-08-18 1960)
84261912ebee41 Steven Rostedt (Red Hat 2014-08-18 @1961) static void ftrace_hash_rec_disable_modify(struct ftrace_ops *ops,
5177364f840058 Steven Rostedt (Google 2024-06-04 1962) bool filter_hash)
84261912ebee41 Steven Rostedt (Red Hat 2014-08-18 1963) {
5177364f840058 Steven Rostedt (Google 2024-06-04 1964) ftrace_hash_rec_update_modify(ops, filter_hash, false);
84261912ebee41 Steven Rostedt (Red Hat 2014-08-18 1965) }
84261912ebee41 Steven Rostedt (Red Hat 2014-08-18 1966)
84261912ebee41 Steven Rostedt (Red Hat 2014-08-18 @1967) static void ftrace_hash_rec_enable_modify(struct ftrace_ops *ops,
5177364f840058 Steven Rostedt (Google 2024-06-04 1968) bool filter_hash)
84261912ebee41 Steven Rostedt (Red Hat 2014-08-18 1969) {
5177364f840058 Steven Rostedt (Google 2024-06-04 1970) ftrace_hash_rec_update_modify(ops, filter_hash, true);
84261912ebee41 Steven Rostedt (Red Hat 2014-08-18 1971) }
84261912ebee41 Steven Rostedt (Red Hat 2014-08-18 1972)
--
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki
From: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> Date: 2024-06-05 10:15:43
On Tue, Jun 04, 2024 at 05:28:19PM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
quoted hunk
From: "Steven Rostedt (Google)" <rostedt@goodmis.org>
The function __ftrace_hash_rec_update() parameter "filter_hash" is only
used for true or false (boolean), but is of type int. It already has an
"inc" parameter that is boolean. This is confusing, make "filter_hash"
boolean as well.
While at it, add some documentation to that function especially since it
holds the guts of the filtering logic of ftrace.
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (Google) <rostedt@goodmis.org>
---
kernel/trace/ftrace.c | 14 +++++++++++++-
1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
I beleive s/to/in/ here, to make this one of:
set the flags in the associated dyn_ftrace records.
... rather than:
set the flags to the associated dyn_ftrace records.
+ *
+ * @filter_hash: True if for the filter hash is udpated, false for the
+ * notrace hash
Typo: s/udpated/updated/
... though I couldn't parse this regardless; maybe:
@filter_hash: true to update the filter hash, false to update
the notrace hash
Mark.
+ * @inc: True to add this hash, false to remove it (increment the
+ * recorder counters or decrement them).
+ */
static bool __ftrace_hash_rec_update(struct ftrace_ops *ops,
- int filter_hash,
+ bool filter_hash,
bool inc)
{
struct ftrace_hash *hash;
--
2.43.0
From: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> Date: 2024-06-05 10:17:35
On Tue, Jun 04, 2024 at 05:28:20PM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
From: "Steven Rostedt (Google)" <rostedt@goodmis.org>
The functions ftrace_hash_rec_disable() and ftrace_hash_rec_enable()
always has 1 passed to its "ftrace_hash" parameter. Remove the parameter
and pass in true to __ftrace_hash_rec_update().
Also add some comments to both those functions explaining what they do.
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (Google) <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Looks good to me.
Acked-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Mark.
@@ -3062,7 +3070,7 @@ int ftrace_startup(struct ftrace_ops *ops, int command)returnret;}-if(ftrace_hash_rec_enable(ops,1))+if(ftrace_hash_rec_enable(ops))command|=FTRACE_UPDATE_CALLS;ftrace_startup_enable(command);
@@ -3104,7 +3112,7 @@ int ftrace_shutdown(struct ftrace_ops *ops, int command)/* Disabling ipmodify never fails */ftrace_hash_ipmodify_disable(ops);-if(ftrace_hash_rec_disable(ops,1))+if(ftrace_hash_rec_disable(ops))command|=FTRACE_UPDATE_CALLS;ops->flags&=~FTRACE_OPS_FL_ENABLED;
From: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> Date: 2024-06-05 10:22:47
On Tue, Jun 04, 2024 at 05:28:21PM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
From: "Steven Rostedt (Google)" <rostedt@goodmis.org>
The parameters "filter_hash" and "inc" in the function
ftrace_hash_rec_update_modify() are boolean. Change them to be such.
Also add documentation to what the function does.
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (Google) <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Aside from the issue with forward declarations that need to be updated,
this looks good to me, so with that fixed:
Acked-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Mark.
I beleive s/to/in/ here, to make this one of:
set the flags in the associated dyn_ftrace records.
... rather than:
set the flags to the associated dyn_ftrace records.
Thanks. It's good to get a "native English speaker" response ;-)
quoted
+ *
+ * @filter_hash: True if for the filter hash is udpated, false for the
+ * notrace hash
Typo: s/udpated/updated/
... though I couldn't parse this regardless; maybe:
@filter_hash: true to update the filter hash, false to update
the notrace hash
Sure.
-- Steve
Mark.
quoted
+ * @inc: True to add this hash, false to remove it (increment the
+ * recorder counters or decrement them).
+ */
static bool __ftrace_hash_rec_update(struct ftrace_ops *ops,
- int filter_hash,
+ bool filter_hash,
bool inc)
{
struct ftrace_hash *hash;
--
2.43.0
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> Date: 2024-06-05 16:06:59
On Wed, 5 Jun 2024 10:18:32 -0400
Steven Rostedt [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
quoted
+ *
+ * @filter_hash: True if for the filter hash is udpated, false for the
+ * notrace hash
Typo: s/udpated/updated/
... though I couldn't parse this regardless; maybe:
@filter_hash: true to update the filter hash, false to update
the notrace hash
Sure.
Actually, they are both wrong. Because I realized your's was not correct, I
started describing it in more detail and realized it does basically the
same thing (but differently) if filter_hash is set or not. I think it can
be removed completely!
I just tried it. I forced "filter_hash" to always be true, and all the
tests worked just fine. This function is only to update the dyn_ftrace
records when an ops is added or removed. It doesn't matter which filter is
being used, as they are both necessary for the update.
This will make that code a bit cleaner and simpler. Let me go and fix that
first, and then add the documentation on top!
This is what happens when you document your code :-p
This code has been rewritten a few times. When it was first written, which
filter was being changed may have been important. But now it is not.
-- Steve
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> Date: 2024-06-05 18:04:54
On Wed, 5 Jun 2024 11:17:31 +0100
Mark Rutland [off-list ref] wrote:
On Tue, Jun 04, 2024 at 05:28:20PM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
quoted
From: "Steven Rostedt (Google)" <rostedt@goodmis.org>
The functions ftrace_hash_rec_disable() and ftrace_hash_rec_enable()
always has 1 passed to its "ftrace_hash" parameter. Remove the parameter
and pass in true to __ftrace_hash_rec_update().
Also add some comments to both those functions explaining what they do.
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (Google) <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Looks good to me.
Acked-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
I removed your Ack from v2 as it changed enough that I believe it
requires a new Ack.
-- Steve
On Tue, 04 Jun 2024 17:28:18 -0400
Steven Rostedt [off-list ref] wrote:
From: "Steven Rostedt (Google)" <rostedt@goodmis.org>
The name "dup_hash()" is a misnomer as it does not duplicate the hash that
is passed in, but instead moves its entities from that hash to a newly
allocated one. Rename it to "__move_hash()" (using starting underscores as
it is an internal function), and add some comments about what it does.
Good change.
Reviewed-by: Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@kernel.org>
Thank you,
On Tue, 04 Jun 2024 17:28:20 -0400
Steven Rostedt [off-list ref] wrote:
From: "Steven Rostedt (Google)" <rostedt@goodmis.org>
The functions ftrace_hash_rec_disable() and ftrace_hash_rec_enable()
always has 1 passed to its "ftrace_hash" parameter. Remove the parameter
and pass in true to __ftrace_hash_rec_update().
Also add some comments to both those functions explaining what they do.
Looks good to me.
Reviewed-by: Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@kernel.org>
Thank you,
@@ -3062,7 +3070,7 @@ int ftrace_startup(struct ftrace_ops *ops, int command)returnret;}-if(ftrace_hash_rec_enable(ops,1))+if(ftrace_hash_rec_enable(ops))command|=FTRACE_UPDATE_CALLS;ftrace_startup_enable(command);
@@ -3104,7 +3112,7 @@ int ftrace_shutdown(struct ftrace_ops *ops, int command)/* Disabling ipmodify never fails */ftrace_hash_ipmodify_disable(ops);-if(ftrace_hash_rec_disable(ops,1))+if(ftrace_hash_rec_disable(ops))command|=FTRACE_UPDATE_CALLS;ops->flags&=~FTRACE_OPS_FL_ENABLED;
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> Date: 2024-06-05 21:54:19
On Thu, 6 Jun 2024 06:50:18 +0900
Masami Hiramatsu (Google) [off-list ref] wrote:
On Tue, 04 Jun 2024 17:28:20 -0400
Steven Rostedt [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
From: "Steven Rostedt (Google)" <rostedt@goodmis.org>
The functions ftrace_hash_rec_disable() and ftrace_hash_rec_enable()
always has 1 passed to its "ftrace_hash" parameter. Remove the parameter
and pass in true to __ftrace_hash_rec_update().
Also add some comments to both those functions explaining what they do.
Looks good to me.
Reviewed-by: Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@kernel.org>