Re: [PATCH v3] tracing/eprobe: no need to check for negative ret value for snprintf
From: Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@kernel.org>
Date: 2023-01-10 00:29:14
Also in:
lkml
From: Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@kernel.org>
Date: 2023-01-10 00:29:14
Also in:
lkml
On Mon, 9 Jan 2023 10:12:26 -0500 Steven Rostedt [off-list ref] wrote:
On Mon, 9 Jan 2023 23:59:13 +0900 Masami Hiramatsu (Google) [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
On Mon, 9 Jan 2023 12:06:25 +0800 Quanfa Fu [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
No need to check for negative return value from snprintf() as the code does not return negative values.Thanks for simplifying, this looks good to me. Acked-by: Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@kernel.org>Reviewed-by: Steven Rostedt (Google) <rostedt@goodmis.org> Masami, do you want to take it into the probes branch, or do you want me to take it into the tracing branch?
Yes, I'll take it to probe/for-next. Thank you!
-- Stevequoted
quoted
Signed-off-by: Quanfa Fu <redacted>
-- Masami Hiramatsu (Google) [off-list ref]