Thread (4 messages) 4 messages, 3 authors, 2023-01-10

Re: [PATCH v3] tracing/eprobe: no need to check for negative ret value for snprintf

From: Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@kernel.org>
Date: 2023-01-10 00:29:14
Also in: lkml

On Mon, 9 Jan 2023 10:12:26 -0500
Steven Rostedt [off-list ref] wrote:
On Mon, 9 Jan 2023 23:59:13 +0900
Masami Hiramatsu (Google) [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
On Mon,  9 Jan 2023 12:06:25 +0800
Quanfa Fu [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
No need to check for negative return value from snprintf() as the
code does not return negative values.
  
Thanks for simplifying, this looks good to me.

Acked-by: Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Steven Rostedt (Google) <rostedt@goodmis.org>

Masami, do you want to take it into the probes branch, or do you want me to
take it into the tracing branch?
Yes, I'll take it to probe/for-next.

Thank you!
-- Steve

quoted
quoted
Signed-off-by: Quanfa Fu <redacted>

-- 
Masami Hiramatsu (Google) [off-list ref]
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help