Re: [PATCH v3 00/11] Symbol Namespaces
From: Nicolas Pitre <hidden>
Date: 2019-08-21 20:48:10
Also in:
linux-amlogic, linux-arch, linux-aspeed, linux-mediatek, linux-samsung-soc, openbmc
Possibly related (same subject, not in this thread)
- 2019-08-21 · Re: [PATCH v3 00/11] Symbol Namespaces · Matthias Maennich <hidden>
- 2019-08-21 · Re: [PATCH v3 00/11] Symbol Namespaces · Greg KH <hidden>
- 2019-08-21 · Re: [PATCH v3 00/11] Symbol Namespaces · Greg KH <hidden>
- 2019-08-21 · Re: [PATCH v3 00/11] Symbol Namespaces · Peter Zijlstra <hidden>
- 2019-08-21 · Re: [PATCH v3 00/11] Symbol Namespaces · Nicolas Pitre <hidden>
On Wed, 21 Aug 2019, Greg KH wrote:
On Wed, Aug 21, 2019 at 08:46:47AM -0400, Nicolas Pitre wrote:quoted
One solution for drastically reducing the effective export surface is to have CONFIG_TRIM_UNUSED_KSYMS=y. This is more extreme than symbol namespace, but might be worth mentioning nevertheless.Oh that's amazing, I never noticed that feature. That is a nice thing, thanks for pointing it out.
For those interested, this feature was demonstrated with numbers here: https://lwn.net/Articles/746780/ Nicolas