[PATCH] staging: pi433: fix docs typos and references to previous struct names

In the comments there where some grammar mistakes and references to
struct names that have gotten renamed over time but not reflected
in the comments.

Signed-off-by: Paulo Miguel Almeida <redacted>
---
 drivers/staging/pi433/pi433_if.h | 25 ++++++++++++-------------
 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/staging/pi433/pi433_if.h b/drivers/staging/pi433/pi433_if.h
index d5c1521192c1..1fae62c40661 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/pi433/pi433_if.h
+++ b/drivers/staging/pi433/pi433_if.h

@@ -5,16 +5,15 @@
  * userspace interface for pi433 radio module
  *
  * Pi433 is a 433MHz radio module for the Raspberry Pi.
- * It is based on the HopeRf Module RFM69CW. Therefore inside of this
- * driver, you'll find an abstraction of the rf69 chip.
+ * It is based on the HopeRf Module RFM69CW. Therefore, inside of this
+ * driver you'll find an abstraction of the rf69 chip.
  *
- * If needed, this driver could be extended, to also support other
- * devices, basing on HopeRfs rf69.
+ * If needed this driver could also be extended to support other
+ * devices based on HopeRf rf69 as well as HopeRf modules with a similar
+ * interface such as RFM69HCW, RFM12, RFM95 and so on.
  *
- * The driver can also be extended, to support other modules of
- * HopeRf with a similar interace - e. g. RFM69HCW, RFM12, RFM95, ...
  * Copyright (C) 2016 Wolf-Entwicklungen
- *	Marcus Wolf <linux@wolf-entwicklungen.de>
+ * Marcus Wolf <linux@wolf-entwicklungen.de>
  */
 
 #ifndef PI433_H

@@ -33,8 +32,8 @@ enum option_on_off {
 /* IOCTL structs and commands */
 
 /**
- * struct pi433_tx_config
- * describes the configuration of the radio module for sending
+ * struct pi433_tx_cfg
+ * describes the configuration of the radio module for sending data
  * @frequency:
  * @bit_rate:
  * @modulation:

@@ -46,7 +45,7 @@ enum option_on_off {
  * @repetitions:
  *
  * ATTENTION:
- * If the contents of 'pi433_tx_config' ever change
+ * If the contents of 'pi433_tx_cfg' ever change
  * incompatibly, then the ioctl number (see define below) must change.
  *
  * NOTE: struct layout is the same in 64bit and 32bit userspace.

@@ -81,8 +80,8 @@ struct pi433_tx_cfg {
 };
 
 /**
- * struct pi433_rx_config
- * describes the configuration of the radio module for sending
+ * struct pi433_rx_cfg
+ * describes the configuration of the radio module for receiving data
  * @frequency:
  * @bit_rate:
  * @modulation:

@@ -94,7 +93,7 @@ struct pi433_tx_cfg {
  * @repetitions:
  *
  * ATTENTION:
- * If the contents of 'pi433_rx_config' ever change
+ * If the contents of 'pi433_rx_cfg' ever change
  * incompatibly, then the ioctl number (see define below) must change
  *
  * NOTE: struct layout is the same in 64bit and 32bit userspace.

-- 
2.25.4

On Sat, Aug 28, 2021 at 12:08:36PM +1200, Paulo Miguel Almeida wrote:

Indentation of the name should remain here, right?

thanks,

greg k-h

On Sat, Aug 28, 2021 at 08:12:54AM +0200, Greg KH wrote:

On Sat, Aug 28, 2021 at 12:08:36PM +1200, Paulo Miguel Almeida wrote:

quoted

In the comments there where some grammar mistakes and references to
struct names that have gotten renamed over time but not reflected
in the comments.

Signed-off-by: Paulo Miguel Almeida <redacted>
---
 drivers/staging/pi433/pi433_if.h | 25 ++++++++++++-------------
 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/staging/pi433/pi433_if.h b/drivers/staging/pi433/pi433_if.h
index d5c1521192c1..1fae62c40661 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/pi433/pi433_if.h
+++ b/drivers/staging/pi433/pi433_if.h

@@ -5,16 +5,15 @@
  * userspace interface for pi433 radio module
  *
  * Pi433 is a 433MHz radio module for the Raspberry Pi.
- * It is based on the HopeRf Module RFM69CW. Therefore inside of this
- * driver, you'll find an abstraction of the rf69 chip.
+ * It is based on the HopeRf Module RFM69CW. Therefore, inside of this
+ * driver you'll find an abstraction of the rf69 chip.
  *
- * If needed, this driver could be extended, to also support other
- * devices, basing on HopeRfs rf69.
+ * If needed this driver could also be extended to support other
+ * devices based on HopeRf rf69 as well as HopeRf modules with a similar
+ * interface such as RFM69HCW, RFM12, RFM95 and so on.
  *
- * The driver can also be extended, to support other modules of
- * HopeRf with a similar interace - e. g. RFM69HCW, RFM12, RFM95, ...
  * Copyright (C) 2016 Wolf-Entwicklungen
- *	Marcus Wolf <linux@wolf-entwicklungen.de>
+ * Marcus Wolf <linux@wolf-entwicklungen.de>

Indentation of the name should remain here, right?

thanks,

greg k-h

you are right, I shouldn't have changed that line. Do you need me to
send another patch without that line or can you ignore just that line 
before merging it to your branch? I'm flexible with any approach.

Best regards,

Paulo Almeida

On Sat, Aug 28, 2021 at 09:27:57PM +1200, Paulo Miguel Almeida wrote:

On Sat, Aug 28, 2021 at 08:12:54AM +0200, Greg KH wrote:

quoted

On Sat, Aug 28, 2021 at 12:08:36PM +1200, Paulo Miguel Almeida wrote:

quoted

In the comments there where some grammar mistakes and references to
struct names that have gotten renamed over time but not reflected
in the comments.

Signed-off-by: Paulo Miguel Almeida <redacted>
---
 drivers/staging/pi433/pi433_if.h | 25 ++++++++++++-------------
 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/staging/pi433/pi433_if.h b/drivers/staging/pi433/pi433_if.h
index d5c1521192c1..1fae62c40661 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/pi433/pi433_if.h
+++ b/drivers/staging/pi433/pi433_if.h

@@ -5,16 +5,15 @@
  * userspace interface for pi433 radio module
  *
  * Pi433 is a 433MHz radio module for the Raspberry Pi.
- * It is based on the HopeRf Module RFM69CW. Therefore inside of this
- * driver, you'll find an abstraction of the rf69 chip.
+ * It is based on the HopeRf Module RFM69CW. Therefore, inside of this
+ * driver you'll find an abstraction of the rf69 chip.
  *
- * If needed, this driver could be extended, to also support other
- * devices, basing on HopeRfs rf69.
+ * If needed this driver could also be extended to support other
+ * devices based on HopeRf rf69 as well as HopeRf modules with a similar
+ * interface such as RFM69HCW, RFM12, RFM95 and so on.
  *
- * The driver can also be extended, to support other modules of
- * HopeRf with a similar interace - e. g. RFM69HCW, RFM12, RFM95, ...
  * Copyright (C) 2016 Wolf-Entwicklungen
- *	Marcus Wolf <linux@wolf-entwicklungen.de>
+ * Marcus Wolf <linux@wolf-entwicklungen.de>

Indentation of the name should remain here, right?

thanks,

greg k-h

you are right, I shouldn't have changed that line. Do you need me to
send another patch without that line or can you ignore just that line 
before merging it to your branch? I'm flexible with any approach.

It is impossible to just "ignore a single line" in a diff, sorry.

Please fix up and resend a new version, remember the work needs to be
done by the developer, not the maintainer.  Your job is to make it
trivial for me to accept your change.  Manually having to edit diffs is
not scalable at all.

thanks,

greg k-h

On Sat, Aug 28, 2021 at 11:44:01AM +0200, Greg KH wrote:

On Sat, Aug 28, 2021 at 09:27:57PM +1200, Paulo Miguel Almeida wrote:

quoted

On Sat, Aug 28, 2021 at 08:12:54AM +0200, Greg KH wrote:

quoted

On Sat, Aug 28, 2021 at 12:08:36PM +1200, Paulo Miguel Almeida wrote:

quoted

In the comments there where some grammar mistakes and references to
struct names that have gotten renamed over time but not reflected
in the comments.

Signed-off-by: Paulo Miguel Almeida <redacted>
---
 drivers/staging/pi433/pi433_if.h | 25 ++++++++++++-------------
 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/staging/pi433/pi433_if.h b/drivers/staging/pi433/pi433_if.h
index d5c1521192c1..1fae62c40661 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/pi433/pi433_if.h
+++ b/drivers/staging/pi433/pi433_if.h

@@ -5,16 +5,15 @@
  * userspace interface for pi433 radio module
  *
  * Pi433 is a 433MHz radio module for the Raspberry Pi.
- * It is based on the HopeRf Module RFM69CW. Therefore inside of this
- * driver, you'll find an abstraction of the rf69 chip.
+ * It is based on the HopeRf Module RFM69CW. Therefore, inside of this
+ * driver you'll find an abstraction of the rf69 chip.
  *
- * If needed, this driver could be extended, to also support other
- * devices, basing on HopeRfs rf69.
+ * If needed this driver could also be extended to support other
+ * devices based on HopeRf rf69 as well as HopeRf modules with a similar
+ * interface such as RFM69HCW, RFM12, RFM95 and so on.
  *
- * The driver can also be extended, to support other modules of
- * HopeRf with a similar interace - e. g. RFM69HCW, RFM12, RFM95, ...
  * Copyright (C) 2016 Wolf-Entwicklungen
- *	Marcus Wolf <linux@wolf-entwicklungen.de>
+ * Marcus Wolf <linux@wolf-entwicklungen.de>

Indentation of the name should remain here, right?

thanks,

greg k-h

you are right, I shouldn't have changed that line. Do you need me to
send another patch without that line or can you ignore just that line 
before merging it to your branch? I'm flexible with any approach.

It is impossible to just "ignore a single line" in a diff, sorry.

Please fix up and resend a new version, remember the work needs to be
done by the developer, not the maintainer.  Your job is to make it
trivial for me to accept your change.  Manually having to edit diffs is
not scalable at all.

Ok. I will do it shortly

Best regards,

Paulo Almeida