[PATCH v2] 8250_pci.c: Update NI specific devices class to multi serial
From: Guan Yung Tseng <hidden>
Date: 2019-01-22 09:20:17
Also in:
lkml
On, Jan 14, 2019 at 10:10:05PM +0800, Guan Yung Tseng wrote:
quoted
Modified NI devices class to PCI_CLASS_COMMUNICATION_MULTISERIAL. The reason of doing this is because all NI multi port serial cards use PCI_CLASS_COMMUNICATION_OTHER class and thus fail the serial_pci_is_class_communication test added in the commit 7d8905d06405 ("serial: 8250_pci: Enable device after we check black list"). Signed-off-by: Guan Yung Tseng <redacted> --- drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_pci.c | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+)diff --git a/drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_pci.c b/drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_pci.c index 4986b4a..0949db1 100644 --- a/drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_pci.c +++ b/drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_pci.c@@ -663,6 +663,13 @@ static int pci_xircom_init(struct pci_dev *dev) return 0; } +static int pci_ni_probe(struct pci_dev *dev) +{ + dev->class = PCI_CLASS_COMMUNICATION_MULTISERIAL << 8 | + (dev->class & 0xff);
As Christoph said, this looks really odd. This field comes from the PCI structure on the device, it should not be modified by the kernel. Unless the device is broken and needs to be fixed up in the kernel? Also, you have sent 2 different patches here for this type of issue, are both needed? If so, please resend both of them as a patch series, with more explainations in this one as to why you are modifying this field. I've dropped all pending patches from you from my queue now.
Hi Christoph and Greg, Sorry for the confusion sending 2 different patches to solve the same issue. I should have wait for your response before sending antoher patch to solve the similar issue. For some historical reason, NI serial devices use PCI_CLASS_COMMUNICATION_OTHER class code. Yes, I understand that the class code should read from config space instead modified from kernel. But these devices are shipped to the market for many years. That's why I am trying to fix the problem in the kernel. I will send another simple patch again to fix the problem.