Thread (5 messages) 5 messages, 2 authors, 2012-05-19

Re: kmscon: replacing CONFIG_VT

From: Alan Cox <hidden>
Date: 2012-05-19 11:52:57

So you are basically saying that such an drmcon driver isn't needed,
anyway? If we keep backwards compatibility to CONFIG_VT, everyone who
wants a boot-log on the display just needs to enable CONFIG_VT. Sounds
reasonable.
For a lot of applications I think this will be true.
quoted
As far as compatibility goes we have the ttyprintk driver which just
provides a fake tty which types nothing and whose output goes to the
console.
I haven't found any applications that fail without /dev/tty, however,
thanks for the hint.
There are quite a few, but ttyprintk means that if you've got a printk
console you've got a console "tty" at least for output. End of problem
therefore.
Thanks for the answers. So I can concentrate on the user-space parts
and maybe later implement some drmcon'ish driver.
I think so. And bear in mind a "drmcon'ish driver" for rescue could be a
shared library you can link the boot environment with, one that makes
minimal use of drm and /dev/input to implement a very basic vt.

Alan
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help