From: Pavel Skripkin <hidden> Date: 2021-07-10 07:03:16
This small patch series fixes 2 bugs in cipso code. The first one was
found by syzbot and the second was found while testing fix for the
fisrt one. All 2 bugs can be triggered by reproducer provided by syzbot:
https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?id=d4bc7d67efe79c6ead3cb6bd94b84dbd287f1069
Pavel Skripkin (2):
net: cipso: fix warnings in netlbl_cipsov4_add_std
net: cipso: fix memory leak in cipso_v4_doi_free
net/ipv4/cipso_ipv4.c | 1 +
net/netlabel/netlabel_cipso_v4.c | 8 ++++----
2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
--
2.32.0
From: Pavel Skripkin <hidden> Date: 2021-07-10 07:03:24
Syzbot reported warning in netlbl_cipsov4_add(). The
problem was in too big doi_def->map.std->lvl.local_size
passed to kcalloc(). Since this value comes from userpace there is
no need to warn if value is not correct.
The same problem may occur with other kcalloc() calls in
this function, so, I've added __GFP_NOWARN flag to all
kcalloc() calls there.
Reported-and-tested-by: syzbot+cdd51ee2e6b0b2e18c0d@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Fixes: 96cb8e3313c7 ("[NetLabel]: CIPSOv4 and Unlabeled packet integration")
Signed-off-by: Pavel Skripkin <redacted>
---
net/netlabel/netlabel_cipso_v4.c | 8 ++++----
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
Hi, Dongliang!
Thank you for the information. I'm wondering, can maintainer pick only 1
patch from series, or I should send v2?
With regards,
Pavel Skripkin
From: Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com> Date: 2021-07-12 15:03:19
On Sat, Jul 10, 2021 at 3:03 AM Pavel Skripkin [off-list ref] wrote:
Syzbot reported warning in netlbl_cipsov4_add(). The
problem was in too big doi_def->map.std->lvl.local_size
passed to kcalloc(). Since this value comes from userpace there is
no need to warn if value is not correct.
The same problem may occur with other kcalloc() calls in
this function, so, I've added __GFP_NOWARN flag to all
kcalloc() calls there.
Reported-and-tested-by: syzbot+cdd51ee2e6b0b2e18c0d@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Fixes: 96cb8e3313c7 ("[NetLabel]: CIPSOv4 and Unlabeled packet integration")
Signed-off-by: Pavel Skripkin <redacted>
---
net/netlabel/netlabel_cipso_v4.c | 8 ++++----
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
This seems fine to me, callers will get a ENOMEM error code too so it
isn't like the failure is going to be a mystery, especially in the
case where an obscenely large translation mapping is being attempted.
Acked-by: Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>
As an aside, I see no reason why this patch can't be merged and 2/2
simply dropped as already in-tree. As has already been pointed out,
patch 2/2 is a duplicate; the in-tree commit is d612c3f3fae2 ("net:
ipv4: fix memory leak in netlbl_cipsov4_add_std").
From: Pavel Skripkin <hidden> Date: 2021-07-26 11:11:49
On Sat, 10 Jul 2021 10:03:13 +0300
Pavel Skripkin [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted hunk
Syzbot reported warning in netlbl_cipsov4_add(). The
problem was in too big doi_def->map.std->lvl.local_size
passed to kcalloc(). Since this value comes from userpace there is
no need to warn if value is not correct.
The same problem may occur with other kcalloc() calls in
this function, so, I've added __GFP_NOWARN flag to all
kcalloc() calls there.
Reported-and-tested-by:
syzbot+cdd51ee2e6b0b2e18c0d@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Fixes:
96cb8e3313c7 ("[NetLabel]: CIPSOv4 and Unlabeled packet integration")
Signed-off-by: Pavel Skripkin <redacted> ---
net/netlabel/netlabel_cipso_v4.c | 8 ++++----
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/netlabel/netlabel_cipso_v4.c
b/net/netlabel/netlabel_cipso_v4.c index 4f50a64315cf..50f40943c815
100644 --- a/net/netlabel/netlabel_cipso_v4.c
+++ b/net/netlabel/netlabel_cipso_v4.c
@@ -187,14 +187,14 @@ static int netlbl_cipsov4_add_std(struct
Hi, net developers!
Is this patch merged somewhere? I've checked net tree and Paul Moore
tree on https://git.kernel.org/, but didn't find it. Did I miss it
somewhere? If not, it's just a gentle ping :)
Btw: maybe I should send it as separete patch, since 2/2 in this
series is invalid as already in-tree?
With regards,
Pavel Skripkin
From: Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com> Date: 2021-07-27 02:40:43
On Mon, Jul 26, 2021 at 7:11 AM Pavel Skripkin [off-list ref] wrote:
On Sat, 10 Jul 2021 10:03:13 +0300
Pavel Skripkin [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
Syzbot reported warning in netlbl_cipsov4_add(). The
problem was in too big doi_def->map.std->lvl.local_size
passed to kcalloc(). Since this value comes from userpace there is
no need to warn if value is not correct.
The same problem may occur with other kcalloc() calls in
this function, so, I've added __GFP_NOWARN flag to all
kcalloc() calls there.
Reported-and-tested-by:
syzbot+cdd51ee2e6b0b2e18c0d@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Fixes:
96cb8e3313c7 ("[NetLabel]: CIPSOv4 and Unlabeled packet integration")
Signed-off-by: Pavel Skripkin <redacted> ---
net/netlabel/netlabel_cipso_v4.c | 8 ++++----
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
Hi, net developers!
Is this patch merged somewhere? I've checked net tree and Paul Moore
tree on https://git.kernel.org/, but didn't find it. Did I miss it
somewhere? If not, it's just a gentle ping :)
Btw: maybe I should send it as separete patch, since 2/2 in this
series is invalid as already in-tree?
I'm not sure why this hasn't been picked up yet, but I suppose
resubmitting just this patch couldn't hurt. Don't forget to include
my ACK if you do.
--
paul moore
www.paul-moore.com