[PATCH] ima: Fix function name error in comment.

Function "ima_file_check" is written as "ima_path_check" in
the comment. Fix this error to prevent misunderstanding.

Signed-off-by: Jiele Zhao <redacted>
---
 security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c b/security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c
index 9ef748ea829f..03bef720ab44 100644
--- a/security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c
+++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c

@@ -482,7 +482,7 @@ int ima_bprm_check(struct linux_binprm *bprm)
 }
 
 /**
- * ima_path_check - based on policy, collect/store measurement.
+ * ima_file_check - based on policy, collect/store measurement.
  * @file: pointer to the file to be measured
  * @mask: contains MAY_READ, MAY_WRITE, MAY_EXEC or MAY_APPEND
  *

-- 
2.25.1

Hi Jiele,

On Tue, 2021-03-23 at 09:19 +0000, Jiele Zhao wrote:

Function "ima_file_check" is written as "ima_path_check" in
the comment. Fix this error to prevent misunderstanding.

Signed-off-by: Jiele Zhao <redacted>

The original function name was ima_path_check().  The policy parsing
still supports PATH_CHECK.   Commit 9bbb6cad0173 ("ima: rename
ima_path_check to ima_file_check") renamed the function to
ima_file_check(), but missed modifying the function name in the
comment.

Please update this patch description accordingly and add the "Fixes"
tag.

thanks,

Mimi

Ping.

On 2021/3/23 17:19, Jiele Zhao wrote: