On Wed, Feb 13, 2019 at 08:27:44AM -0800, Tadeusz Struk wrote:

On 2/13/19 7:13 AM, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:

quoted

On Tue, 2019-02-12 at 15:42 -0800, Tadeusz Struk wrote:

quoted

Three new tests added:
1. Send get random cmd, read header in 1st read, read the rest in second
   read - expect success
2. Send get random cmd, read only part of the response, send another
   get random command, read the response - expect success
3. Send get random cmd followed by another get random cmd, without
   reading the first response - expect the second cmd to fail with -EBUSY

Signed-off-by: Tadeusz Struk <redacted>

Getting still some garbage in the output:

$ sudo ./test_smoke.sh 
[sudo] password for jsakkine: 
test_read_partial_overwrite (tpm2_tests.SmokeTest)
Reads only part of the response and issue a new cmd ... ok
test_read_partial_resp (tpm2_tests.SmokeTest)
Reads random in two subsequent reads ... ok
test_seal_with_auth (tpm2_tests.SmokeTest) ... ok
test_seal_with_policy (tpm2_tests.SmokeTest) ... ok
test_seal_with_too_long_auth (tpm2_tests.SmokeTest) ... ok
test_send_two_cmds (tpm2_tests.SmokeTest)
Send two cmds without reading a response ... ok
test_too_short_cmd (tpm2_tests.SmokeTest) ... ok
test_unseal_with_wrong_auth (tpm2_tests.SmokeTest) ... ok
test_unseal_with_wrong_policy (tpm2_tests.SmokeTest) ... ok

Looks like python unittest prints out the docstrings:

+    def test_read_partial_resp(self):
+        """Reads random in two subsequent reads"""

I can remove them if it makes more difficult to process the output.

Yeah, I mean it also outputs the function name, which is good enough
IMHO.

/Jarkko