Re: [RFC PATCH v1 0/5] Add support for O_MAYEXEC

2 messages, 2 authors, 2018-12-12 · open the first message on its own page

Re: [RFC PATCH v1 0/5] Add support for O_MAYEXEC

From: Florian Weimer <hidden>
Date: 2018-12-12 20:13:26

* James Morris:
If you're depending on the script interpreter to flag that the user may 
execute code, this seems to be equivalent in security terms to depending 
on the user.  e.g. what if the user uses ptrace and clears O_MAYEXEC?
The argument I've heard is this: Using ptrace (and adding the +x
attribute) are auditable events.

Florian

Re: [RFC PATCH v1 0/5] Add support for O_MAYEXEC

From: James Morris <jmorris@namei.org>
Date: 2018-12-12 23:40:59

On Wed, 12 Dec 2018, Florian Weimer wrote:
* James Morris:
quoted
If you're depending on the script interpreter to flag that the user may 
execute code, this seems to be equivalent in security terms to depending 
on the user.  e.g. what if the user uses ptrace and clears O_MAYEXEC?
The argument I've heard is this: Using ptrace (and adding the +x
attribute) are auditable events.
I guess you could also preload a modified libc which strips the flag.


-- 
James Morris
[off-list ref]
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help