Seccomp received improved logging controls in v4.14. Applications can opt into
logging of "handled" actions (SECCOMP_RET_TRAP, SECCOMP_RET_TRACE,
SECCOMP_RET_ERRNO) using the SECCOMP_FILTER_FLAG_LOG bit when loading filters.
They can also debug filter matching with the new SECCOMP_RET_LOG action.
Administrators can prevent specific actions from being logged using the
kernel.seccomp.actions_logged sysctl.
However, one corner case intentionally wasn't addressed in those v4.14 changes.
When a process is being inspected by the audit subsystem, seccomp's decision
making for logging ignores the new controls and unconditionally logs every
action taken except for SECCOMP_RET_ALLOW. This isn't particularly useful since
many existing applications don't intend to log handled actions due to them
occurring very frequently. This amount of logging fills the audit logs without
providing many benefits now that application authors have fine grained controls
at their disposal.
This patch set aligns the seccomp logging behavior for both audited and
unaudited processes. It also emits an audit record, if auditing is enabled,
when the kernel.seccomp.actions_logged sysctl is written to so that there's a
paper trail when entire actions are quieted.
Tyler
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-security-module" in
the body of a message to majordomo at vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Break the read and write paths of the kernel.seccomp.actions_logged
sysctl into separate functions to maintain readability. An upcoming
change will need to audit writes, but not reads, of this sysctl which
would introduce too many conditional code paths on whether or not the
'write' parameter evaluates to true.
Signed-off-by: Tyler Hicks <redacted>
---
kernel/seccomp.c | 60 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------------
1 file changed, 38 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
--
2.7.4
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-security-module" in
the body of a message to majordomo at vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
The decision to log a seccomp action will always be subject to the
value of the kernel.seccomp.actions_logged sysctl, even for processes
that are being inspected via the audit subsystem, in an upcoming patch.
Therefore, we need to emit an audit record on attempts at writing to the
actions_logged sysctl when auditing is enabled.
This patch updates the write handler for the actions_logged sysctl to
emit an audit record on attempts to write to the sysctl. Successful
writes to the sysctl will result in a record that includes a normalized
list of logged actions in the "actions" field and a "res" field equal to
0. Unsuccessful writes to the sysctl will result in a record that
doesn't include the "actions" field and has a "res" field equal to 1.
Not all unsuccessful writes to the sysctl are audited. For example, an
audit record will not be emitted if an unprivileged process attempts to
open the sysctl file for reading since that access control check is not
part of the sysctl's write handler.
Below are some example audit records when writing various strings to the
actions_logged sysctl.
Writing "not-a-real-action" emits:
type=CONFIG_CHANGE msg=audit(1524600971.363:119): pid=1651 uid=0
auid=1000 tty=pts8 ses=1 comm="tee" exe="/usr/bin/tee"
op=seccomp-logging res=1
Writing "kill_process kill_thread errno trace log" emits:
type=CONFIG_CHANGE msg=audit(1524601023.982:131): pid=1658 uid=0
auid=1000 tty=pts8 ses=1 comm="tee" exe="/usr/bin/tee"
op=seccomp-logging actions="kill_process kill_thread errno trace log"
res=0
Writing the string "log log errno trace kill_process kill_thread", which
is unordered and contains the log action twice, results in the same
value as the previous example for the actions field:
type=CONFIG_CHANGE msg=audit(1524601204.365:152): pid=1704 uid=0
auid=1000 tty=pts8 ses=1 comm="tee" exe="/usr/bin/tee"
op=seccomp-logging actions="kill_process kill_thread errno trace log"
res=0
No audit records are generated when reading the actions_logged sysctl.
Suggested-by: Steve Grubb <redacted>
Signed-off-by: Tyler Hicks <redacted>
---
include/linux/audit.h | 3 +++
kernel/auditsc.c | 37 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
kernel/seccomp.c | 43 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
3 files changed, 74 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
@@ -502,6 +503,8 @@ static inline void __audit_seccomp(unsigned long syscall, long signr, int code){}staticinlinevoidaudit_seccomp(unsignedlongsyscall,longsignr,intcode){}+staticinlinevoidaudit_seccomp_actions_logged(constchar*names,intres)+{}staticinlineintauditsc_get_stamp(structaudit_context*ctx,structtimespec64*t,unsignedint*serial){
--
2.7.4
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-security-module" in
the body of a message to majordomo at vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Seccomp logging for "handled" actions such as RET_TRAP, RET_TRACE, or
RET_ERRNO can be very noisy for processes that are being audited. This
patch modifies the seccomp logging behavior to treat processes that are
being inspected via the audit subsystem the same as processes that
aren't under inspection. Handled actions will no longer be logged just
because the process is being inspected. Since v4.14, applications have
the ability to request logging of handled actions by using the
SECCOMP_FILTER_FLAG_LOG flag when loading seccomp filters.
With this patch, the logic for deciding if an action will be logged is:
if action == RET_ALLOW:
do not log
else if action not in actions_logged:
do not log
else if action == RET_KILL:
log
else if action == RET_LOG:
log
else if filter-requests-logging:
log
else:
do not log
Reported-by: Steve Grubb <redacted>
Signed-off-by: Tyler Hicks <redacted>
---
Documentation/userspace-api/seccomp_filter.rst | 7 -------
include/linux/audit.h | 10 +---------
kernel/auditsc.c | 2 +-
kernel/seccomp.c | 15 +++++----------
4 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)
@@ -207,13 +207,6 @@ directory. Here's a description of each file in that directory: to the file do not need to be in ordered form but reads from the file will be ordered in the same way as the actions_avail sysctl.- It is important to note that the value of ``actions_logged`` does not- prevent certain actions from being logged when the audit subsystem is- configured to audit a task. If the action is not found in-``actions_logged`` list, the final decision on whether to audit the- action for that task is ultimately left up to the audit subsystem to- decide for all seccomp return values other than ``SECCOMP_RET_ALLOW``.- The ``allow`` string is not accepted in the ``actions_logged`` sysctl as it is not possible to log ``SECCOMP_RET_ALLOW`` actions. Attempting to write ``allow`` to the sysctl will result in an EINVAL being
@@ -584,18 +584,13 @@ static inline void seccomp_log(unsigned long syscall, long signr, u32 action,}/*-*ForceanauditmessagetobeemittedwhentheactionisRET_KILL_*,-*RET_LOG,ortheFILTER_FLAG_LOGbitwassetandtheactionis-*allowedtobeloggedbytheadmin.+*EmitanauditmessagewhentheactionisRET_KILL_*,RET_LOG,orthe+*FILTER_FLAG_LOGbitwasset.Theadminhastheabilitytosilence+*anyactionfrombeingloggedbyremovingtheactionnamefromthe+*seccomp_actions_loggedsysctl.*/if(log)-return__audit_seccomp(syscall,signr,action);--/*-*Lettheauditsubsystemdecideiftheactionshouldbeauditedbased-*onwhetherthecurrenttaskitselfisbeingaudited.-*/-returnaudit_seccomp(syscall,signr,action);+audit_seccomp(syscall,signr,action);}/*
--
2.7.4
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-security-module" in
the body of a message to majordomo at vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
From: Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com> Date: 2018-05-01 15:19:01
On Fri, Apr 27, 2018 at 3:16 PM, Tyler Hicks [off-list ref] wrote:
The decision to log a seccomp action will always be subject to the
value of the kernel.seccomp.actions_logged sysctl, even for processes
that are being inspected via the audit subsystem, in an upcoming patch.
Therefore, we need to emit an audit record on attempts at writing to the
actions_logged sysctl when auditing is enabled.
This patch updates the write handler for the actions_logged sysctl to
emit an audit record on attempts to write to the sysctl. Successful
writes to the sysctl will result in a record that includes a normalized
list of logged actions in the "actions" field and a "res" field equal to
0. Unsuccessful writes to the sysctl will result in a record that
doesn't include the "actions" field and has a "res" field equal to 1.
Not all unsuccessful writes to the sysctl are audited. For example, an
audit record will not be emitted if an unprivileged process attempts to
open the sysctl file for reading since that access control check is not
part of the sysctl's write handler.
Below are some example audit records when writing various strings to the
actions_logged sysctl.
Writing "not-a-real-action" emits:
type=CONFIG_CHANGE msg=audit(1524600971.363:119): pid=1651 uid=0
auid=1000 tty=pts8 ses=1 comm="tee" exe="/usr/bin/tee"
op=seccomp-logging res=1
Writing "kill_process kill_thread errno trace log" emits:
type=CONFIG_CHANGE msg=audit(1524601023.982:131): pid=1658 uid=0
auid=1000 tty=pts8 ses=1 comm="tee" exe="/usr/bin/tee"
op=seccomp-logging actions="kill_process kill_thread errno trace log"
res=0
I've got some additional comments regarding the fields in the code
below, but it would be good to hear Steve comment on the "actions"
field since his userspace tools are extremely picky about what they
will accept. It looks like you are treating the actions as an
untrusted string, which is good, so I suspect you are okay, but still
...
Writing the string "log log errno trace kill_process kill_thread", which
is unordered and contains the log action twice, results in the same
value as the previous example for the actions field:
type=CONFIG_CHANGE msg=audit(1524601204.365:152): pid=1704 uid=0
auid=1000 tty=pts8 ses=1 comm="tee" exe="/usr/bin/tee"
op=seccomp-logging actions="kill_process kill_thread errno trace log"
res=0
No audit records are generated when reading the actions_logged sysctl.
Suggested-by: Steve Grubb <redacted>
Signed-off-by: Tyler Hicks <redacted>
---
include/linux/audit.h | 3 +++
kernel/auditsc.c | 37 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
kernel/seccomp.c | 43 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
3 files changed, 74 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
@@ -502,6 +503,8 @@ static inline void __audit_seccomp(unsigned long syscall, long signr, int code){}staticinlinevoidaudit_seccomp(unsignedlongsyscall,longsignr,intcode){}+staticinlinevoidaudit_seccomp_actions_logged(constchar*names,intres)+{}staticinlineintauditsc_get_stamp(structaudit_context*ctx,structtimespec64*t,unsignedint*serial){
@@ -2478,6 +2478,43 @@ void __audit_seccomp(unsigned long syscall, long signr, int code)audit_log_end(ab);}+voidaudit_seccomp_actions_logged(constchar*names,intres)+{+structtty_struct*tty;+conststructcred*cred;+structaudit_buffer*ab;+charcomm[sizeof(current->comm)];++if(!audit_enabled)+return;++ab=audit_log_start(NULL,GFP_KERNEL,AUDIT_CONFIG_CHANGE);+if(unlikely(!ab))+return;
Instead of NULL, let's pass current->audit_context to
audit_log_start(). Yes, most of the AUDIT_CONFIG_CHANGE users pass
NULL but all of that is going to need to change because of 1) the
audit container ID work and 2) it makes sense to connect records that
are related. Let's do it right the first time here :)
One of the benefits of using current->audit_context is that we get a
lot of this info from the associated SYSCALL record (assuming the
admin isn't filtering that, e.g. Fedora defaults). We can safely drop
most everything except for the "op" and "actions" fields.
Steve might also want an "old-actions" field, but I'll let him speak to that.
--
paul moore
www.paul-moore.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-security-module" in
the body of a message to majordomo at vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
From: Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com> Date: 2018-05-01 15:27:50
On Fri, Apr 27, 2018 at 3:16 PM, Tyler Hicks [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted hunk
Seccomp logging for "handled" actions such as RET_TRAP, RET_TRACE, or
RET_ERRNO can be very noisy for processes that are being audited. This
patch modifies the seccomp logging behavior to treat processes that are
being inspected via the audit subsystem the same as processes that
aren't under inspection. Handled actions will no longer be logged just
because the process is being inspected. Since v4.14, applications have
the ability to request logging of handled actions by using the
SECCOMP_FILTER_FLAG_LOG flag when loading seccomp filters.
With this patch, the logic for deciding if an action will be logged is:
if action == RET_ALLOW:
do not log
else if action not in actions_logged:
do not log
else if action == RET_KILL:
log
else if action == RET_LOG:
log
else if filter-requests-logging:
log
else:
do not log
Reported-by: Steve Grubb <redacted>
Signed-off-by: Tyler Hicks <redacted>
---
Documentation/userspace-api/seccomp_filter.rst | 7 -------
include/linux/audit.h | 10 +---------
kernel/auditsc.c | 2 +-
kernel/seccomp.c | 15 +++++----------
4 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)
@@ -207,13 +207,6 @@ directory. Here's a description of each file in that directory: to the file do not need to be in ordered form but reads from the file will be ordered in the same way as the actions_avail sysctl.- It is important to note that the value of ``actions_logged`` does not- prevent certain actions from being logged when the audit subsystem is- configured to audit a task. If the action is not found in-``actions_logged`` list, the final decision on whether to audit the- action for that task is ultimately left up to the audit subsystem to- decide for all seccomp return values other than ``SECCOMP_RET_ALLOW``.- The ``allow`` string is not accepted in the ``actions_logged`` sysctl as it is not possible to log ``SECCOMP_RET_ALLOW`` actions. Attempting to write ``allow`` to the sysctl will result in an EINVAL being
Since it is a bit unusual, it might be nice to add a comment at the
top of audit_seccomp() that the event filtering is being done in the
seccomp_log() function, and we may need to force auditing independent
of the audit_enabled and dummy context state.
@@ -584,18 +584,13 @@ static inline void seccomp_log(unsigned long syscall, long signr, u32 action,}/*-*ForceanauditmessagetobeemittedwhentheactionisRET_KILL_*,-*RET_LOG,ortheFILTER_FLAG_LOGbitwassetandtheactionis-*allowedtobeloggedbytheadmin.+*EmitanauditmessagewhentheactionisRET_KILL_*,RET_LOG,orthe+*FILTER_FLAG_LOGbitwasset.Theadminhastheabilitytosilence+*anyactionfrombeingloggedbyremovingtheactionnamefromthe+*seccomp_actions_loggedsysctl.*/if(log)-return__audit_seccomp(syscall,signr,action);--/*-*Lettheauditsubsystemdecideiftheactionshouldbeauditedbased-*onwhetherthecurrenttaskitselfisbeingaudited.-*/-returnaudit_seccomp(syscall,signr,action);+audit_seccomp(syscall,signr,action);}/*--
2.7.4
--
paul moore
www.paul-moore.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-security-module" in
the body of a message to majordomo at vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
From: Steve Grubb <hidden> Date: 2018-05-01 16:41:37
On Tuesday, May 1, 2018 11:18:55 AM EDT Paul Moore wrote:
On Fri, Apr 27, 2018 at 3:16 PM, Tyler Hicks [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
The decision to log a seccomp action will always be subject to the
value of the kernel.seccomp.actions_logged sysctl, even for processes
that are being inspected via the audit subsystem, in an upcoming patch.
Therefore, we need to emit an audit record on attempts at writing to the
actions_logged sysctl when auditing is enabled.
This patch updates the write handler for the actions_logged sysctl to
emit an audit record on attempts to write to the sysctl. Successful
writes to the sysctl will result in a record that includes a normalized
list of logged actions in the "actions" field and a "res" field equal to
0. Unsuccessful writes to the sysctl will result in a record that
doesn't include the "actions" field and has a "res" field equal to 1.
Not all unsuccessful writes to the sysctl are audited. For example, an
audit record will not be emitted if an unprivileged process attempts to
open the sysctl file for reading since that access control check is not
part of the sysctl's write handler.
Below are some example audit records when writing various strings to the
actions_logged sysctl.
Writing "not-a-real-action" emits:
type=CONFIG_CHANGE msg=audit(1524600971.363:119): pid=1651 uid=0
auid=1000 tty=pts8 ses=1 comm="tee" exe="/usr/bin/tee"
op=seccomp-logging res=1
Writing "kill_process kill_thread errno trace log" emits:
type=CONFIG_CHANGE msg=audit(1524601023.982:131): pid=1658 uid=0
auid=1000 tty=pts8 ses=1 comm="tee" exe="/usr/bin/tee"
op=seccomp-logging actions="kill_process kill_thread errno trace log"
res=0
I've got some additional comments regarding the fields in the code
below, but it would be good to hear Steve comment on the "actions"
field since his userspace tools are extremely picky about what they
will accept.
Its not that the audit user space applications are picky, its that we have a
coding standard that everyone needs to abide by so that any parser coded to
the specification works. In short, we should not have spaces inside the ""
because that can trick a naive parser. What we typically do in a situation
like this is add a comma as a separator. But having "" means that the value
is untrusted and subject to escaping. I don't think that is the case here.
Output is not controlled by the user. Its a list of well known names.
It looks like you are treating the actions as an untrusted string, which is
good, so I suspect you are okay, but still
The function below that logs names is calling audit_log_format which does not
handle untrusted strings. I would suggest not treating it as an untrusted
string, but as a string with no spaces in it.
actions=kill_process,kill_thread,errno,trace,log
quoted
Writing the string "log log errno trace kill_process kill_thread", which
is unordered and contains the log action twice, results in the same
value as the previous example for the actions field:
type=CONFIG_CHANGE msg=audit(1524601204.365:152): pid=1704 uid=0
auid=1000 tty=pts8 ses=1 comm="tee" exe="/usr/bin/tee"
op=seccomp-logging actions="kill_process kill_thread errno trace log"
res=0
No audit records are generated when reading the actions_logged sysctl.
Suggested-by: Steve Grubb <redacted>
Signed-off-by: Tyler Hicks <redacted>
---
include/linux/audit.h | 3 +++
kernel/auditsc.c | 37 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
kernel/seccomp.c | 43 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
3 files changed, 74 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
@@ -2478,6 +2478,43 @@ void __audit_seccomp(unsigned long syscall, long
signr, int code)>
audit_log_end(ab);
}
+void audit_seccomp_actions_logged(const char *names, int res)
+{
+ struct tty_struct *tty;
+ const struct cred *cred;
+ struct audit_buffer *ab;
+ char comm[sizeof(current->comm)];
+
+ if (!audit_enabled)
+ return;
+
+ ab = audit_log_start(NULL, GFP_KERNEL, AUDIT_CONFIG_CHANGE);
+ if (unlikely(!ab))
+ return;
Instead of NULL, let's pass current->audit_context to
audit_log_start(). Yes, most of the AUDIT_CONFIG_CHANGE users pass
NULL but all of that is going to need to change because of 1) the
audit container ID work and 2) it makes sense to connect records that
are related. Let's do it right the first time here :)
One of the benefits of using current->audit_context is that we get a
lot of this info from the associated SYSCALL record (assuming the
admin isn't filtering that, e.g. Fedora defaults). We can safely drop
most everything except for the "op" and "actions" fields.
Steve might also want an "old-actions" field, but I'll let him speak to
that.
Configuration changes are supposed to show current and new values.
-Steve
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-security-module" in
the body of a message to majordomo at vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
From: Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com> Date: 2018-05-01 17:25:43
On Tue, May 1, 2018 at 12:41 PM, Steve Grubb [off-list ref] wrote:
On Tuesday, May 1, 2018 11:18:55 AM EDT Paul Moore wrote:
quoted
On Fri, Apr 27, 2018 at 3:16 PM, Tyler Hicks [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
The decision to log a seccomp action will always be subject to the
value of the kernel.seccomp.actions_logged sysctl, even for processes
that are being inspected via the audit subsystem, in an upcoming patch.
Therefore, we need to emit an audit record on attempts at writing to the
actions_logged sysctl when auditing is enabled.
This patch updates the write handler for the actions_logged sysctl to
emit an audit record on attempts to write to the sysctl. Successful
writes to the sysctl will result in a record that includes a normalized
list of logged actions in the "actions" field and a "res" field equal to
0. Unsuccessful writes to the sysctl will result in a record that
doesn't include the "actions" field and has a "res" field equal to 1.
Not all unsuccessful writes to the sysctl are audited. For example, an
audit record will not be emitted if an unprivileged process attempts to
open the sysctl file for reading since that access control check is not
part of the sysctl's write handler.
Below are some example audit records when writing various strings to the
actions_logged sysctl.
Writing "not-a-real-action" emits:
type=CONFIG_CHANGE msg=audit(1524600971.363:119): pid=1651 uid=0
auid=1000 tty=pts8 ses=1 comm="tee" exe="/usr/bin/tee"
op=seccomp-logging res=1
Writing "kill_process kill_thread errno trace log" emits:
type=CONFIG_CHANGE msg=audit(1524601023.982:131): pid=1658 uid=0
auid=1000 tty=pts8 ses=1 comm="tee" exe="/usr/bin/tee"
op=seccomp-logging actions="kill_process kill_thread errno trace log"
res=0
I've got some additional comments regarding the fields in the code
below, but it would be good to hear Steve comment on the "actions"
field since his userspace tools are extremely picky about what they
will accept.
Its not that the audit user space applications are picky, its that we have a
coding standard that everyone needs to abide by so that any parser coded to
the specification works.
We're getting a bit off track, but the issue with the "specification"
is that there has not been enough checking and enforcement of the
"specification" to give it much weight. We've made some fixes to
records of lower impact, but I'm not going to merge disruptive record
changes. After a while, the status-quo becomes the "specification".
At some point in the future I plan to submit patches which disconnect
the audit data from the record format for in-kernel callers; this is
really the only way we can enforce any type of record format. The
current in-kernel audit API is for too open for misuse and abuse.
In short, we should not have spaces inside the ""
because that can trick a naive parser. What we typically do in a situation
like this is add a comma as a separator. But having "" means that the value
is untrusted and subject to escaping. I don't think that is the case here.
Output is not controlled by the user. Its a list of well known names.
quoted
It looks like you are treating the actions as an untrusted string, which is
good, so I suspect you are okay, but still
The function below that logs names is calling audit_log_format which does not
handle untrusted strings. I would suggest not treating it as an untrusted
string, but as a string with no spaces in it.
actions=kill_process,kill_thread,errno,trace,log
Yes, my mistake, I suspect I was distracted by the comm logging.
quoted
quoted
Writing the string "log log errno trace kill_process kill_thread", which
is unordered and contains the log action twice, results in the same
value as the previous example for the actions field:
type=CONFIG_CHANGE msg=audit(1524601204.365:152): pid=1704 uid=0
auid=1000 tty=pts8 ses=1 comm="tee" exe="/usr/bin/tee"
op=seccomp-logging actions="kill_process kill_thread errno trace log"
res=0
No audit records are generated when reading the actions_logged sysctl.
Suggested-by: Steve Grubb <redacted>
Signed-off-by: Tyler Hicks <redacted>
---
include/linux/audit.h | 3 +++
kernel/auditsc.c | 37 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
kernel/seccomp.c | 43 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
3 files changed, 74 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
@@ -2478,6 +2478,43 @@ void __audit_seccomp(unsigned long syscall, long
signr, int code)>
audit_log_end(ab);
}
+void audit_seccomp_actions_logged(const char *names, int res)
+{
+ struct tty_struct *tty;
+ const struct cred *cred;
+ struct audit_buffer *ab;
+ char comm[sizeof(current->comm)];
+
+ if (!audit_enabled)
+ return;
+
+ ab = audit_log_start(NULL, GFP_KERNEL, AUDIT_CONFIG_CHANGE);
+ if (unlikely(!ab))
+ return;
Instead of NULL, let's pass current->audit_context to
audit_log_start(). Yes, most of the AUDIT_CONFIG_CHANGE users pass
NULL but all of that is going to need to change because of 1) the
audit container ID work and 2) it makes sense to connect records that
are related. Let's do it right the first time here :)
One of the benefits of using current->audit_context is that we get a
lot of this info from the associated SYSCALL record (assuming the
admin isn't filtering that, e.g. Fedora defaults). We can safely drop
most everything except for the "op" and "actions" fields.
Steve might also want an "old-actions" field, but I'll let him speak to
that.
Configuration changes are supposed to show current and new values.
-Steve
--
paul moore
www.paul-moore.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-security-module" in
the body of a message to majordomo at vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html