On Mon, 3 May 2021 15:39:19 -0500
"Bajjuri, Praneeth" [off-list ref] wrote:

On 4/19/2021 5:47 PM, Steven Rostedt wrote:

quoted

On Tue, Apr 20, 2021,ycollette.nospam@free.fr  wrote:  

quoted

net/xfrm/xfrm_state.c: In function 'xfrm_state_init':
./include/linux/seqlock.h:178:36: error: initialization of 'seqcount_spinlock_t *' {aka 'struct seqcount_spinlock *'} from incompatible pointer type 'seqcount_t *' {aka 'struct seqcount *'} [-Werror=incompatible-pointer-types]
   178 |   seqcount_##lockname##_t *____s = (s);   \
       |                                    ^  

...  

quoted

net/xfrm/xfrm_state.c:2666:2: note: in expansion of macro 'seqcount_spinlock_init'
  2666 |  seqcount_spinlock_init(&net->xfrm.xfrm_state_hash_generation,
       |  ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~  

There is a rebase error at:

   247560698349 ("Merge tag 'v5.10.30' into v5.10-rt")

Cherry-pick mainline's commit:

   bc8e0adff343 ("net: xfrm: Use sequence counter with associated spinlock")  

Thanks for this fix, Cherry-pick resolved rt stable integration issue 
that i was seeing.

Is this fix going to be posted for v5.10-rt too ?

quoted

and your compilation issue will be fixed.  

Yes, I'm pulling it in now (sorry for the delay).

For some reason, Yann's email never made it into my INBOX :-/

But cherry picking that commit appears to do the job. I'll pull that in,
and then start bringing 5.10 to the latest release.

-- Steve