On Thu, Aug 06, 2015 at 06:14:12PM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:

On Thu, 6 Aug 2015 23:36:49 +0200
Peter Zijlstra [off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

On Thu, Aug 06, 2015 at 03:31:20PM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:

quoted

quoted

4) poll_wait: currently it and poll_table_entry are both hard coupled
   to wait_queue_head_t -- so any users of poll_wait are not eligible
   for conversion to simple wait. (I just happened to notice that
   recently.)  A quick grep shows ~500 poll_wait users.

Looks like a good candidate to test the cwait on :-)

Poll uses custom wake functions, which disqualifies them on the spot.

For cwait? That's the complex wait queue (what the current wait queues
will be called in the future).

Urgh, I don't think we should go rename that.. that's going to be lots
of pain for no to little gain.