# Re: \[PATCH V7\] Allow compaction of unevictable pages

- From: Rik van Riel \<hidden\>
- Date: 2015-03-20 14:47:54 
- List: linux-rt-users
- Page: https://ratatoskr.run/linux-rt-users/2015/03/4455789
- Thread: https://ratatoskr.run/linux-rt-users/2015/03/4455740/t.md

```text
On 03/20/2015 09:49 AM, Eric B Munson wrote:
> Currently, pages which are marked as unevictable are protected from
> compaction, but not from other types of migration.  The POSIX real time
> extension explicitly states that mlock() will prevent a major page
> fault, but the spirit of this is that mlock() should give a process the
> ability to control sources of latency, including minor page faults.
> However, the mlock manpage only explicitly says that a locked page will
> not be written to swap and this can cause some confusion.  The
> compaction code today does not give a developer who wants to avoid swap
> but wants to have large contiguous areas available any method to achieve
> this state.  This patch introduces a sysctl for controlling compaction
> behavior with respect to the unevictable lru.  Users that demand no page
> faults after a page is present can set compact_unevictable_allowed to 0
> and users who need the large contiguous areas can enable compaction on
> locked memory by leaving the default value of 1.
> 
> To illustrate this problem I wrote a quick test program that mmaps a
> large number of 1MB files filled with random data.  These maps are
> created locked and read only.  Then every other mmap is unmapped and I
> attempt to allocate huge pages to the static huge page pool.  When the
> compact_unevictable_allowed sysctl is 0, I cannot allocate hugepages
> after fragmenting memory.  When the value is set to 1, allocations
> succeed.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Eric B Munson <redacted>
> Acked-by: Michal Hocko <redacted>
> Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <redacted>
> Acked-by: Christoph Lameter <redacted>
> Acked-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>

Acked-by: Rik van Riel <redacted>

-- 
All rights reversed
```