[PATCH V2] futex: futex_wait_requeue_pi commentary corrections
STALE6267d
From: Darren Hart <hidden>
Date: 2009-07-31 23:20:14
Also in:
lkml
Subsystem:
the rest · Maintainer:
Linus Torvalds
futex: futex_wait_requeue_pi commentary corrections From: Darren Hart <redacted> The state machine described in the comments wasn't updated with a follow-on fix. Address that and cleanup the corresponding commentary in the function. Signed-off-by: Darren Hart <redacted> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <redacted> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> Cc: Ingo Molnar <redacted> --- kernel/futex.c | 23 ++++++++++------------- 1 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/futex.c b/kernel/futex.c
index 0672ff8..d077201 100644
--- a/kernel/futex.c
+++ b/kernel/futex.c@@ -2102,11 +2102,11 @@ int handle_early_requeue_pi_wakeup(struct futex_hash_bucket *hb, * We call schedule in futex_wait_queue_me() when we enqueue and return there * via the following: * 1) wakeup on uaddr2 after an atomic lock acquisition by futex_requeue() - * 2) wakeup on uaddr2 after a requeue and subsequent unlock - * 3) signal (before or after requeue) - * 4) timeout (before or after requeue) + * 2) wakeup on uaddr2 after a requeue + * 3) signal + * 4) timeout * - * If 3, we setup a restart_block with futex_wait_requeue_pi() as the function. + * If 3, cleanup and return -ERESTARTNOINTR. * * If 2, we may then block on trying to take the rt_mutex and return via: * 5) successful lock
@@ -2114,7 +2114,7 @@ int handle_early_requeue_pi_wakeup(struct futex_hash_bucket *hb, * 7) timeout * 8) other lock acquisition failure * - * If 6, we setup a restart_block with futex_lock_pi() as the function. + * If 6, return -EWOULDBLOCK (restarting the syscall would do the same). * * If 4 or 7, we cleanup and return with -ETIMEDOUT. *
@@ -2232,14 +2232,11 @@ static int futex_wait_requeue_pi(u32 __user *uaddr, int fshared, rt_mutex_unlock(pi_mutex);
} else if (ret == -EINTR) {
/*
- * We've already been requeued, but we have no way to
- * restart by calling futex_lock_pi() directly. We
- * could restart the syscall, but that will look at
- * the user space value and return right away. So we
- * drop back with EWOULDBLOCK to tell user space that
- * "val" has been changed. That's the same what the
- * restart of the syscall would do in
- * futex_wait_setup().
+ * We've already been requeued, but cannot restart by calling
+ * futex_lock_pi() directly. We could restart this syscall, but
+ * it would detect that the user space "val" changed and return
+ * -EWOULDBLOCK. Save the overhead of the restart and return
+ * -EWOULDBLOCK directly.
*/
ret = -EWOULDBLOCK;
}
--
Darren Hart
IBM Linux Technology Center
Real-Time Linux Team