Re: [PATCH rdma-next v4 0/3] SG fix together with update to RDMA umem
From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
Date: 2021-08-30 13:31:40
Also in:
dri-devel, intel-gfx, lkml
On Mon, Aug 30, 2021 at 11:21:00AM +0300, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
On Tue, Aug 24, 2021 at 05:25:28PM +0300, Maor Gottlieb wrote:quoted
From: Maor Gottlieb <redacted> Changelog: v4: * Unify sg_free_table_entries with __sg_free_table v3: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/cover.1627551226.git.leonro@nvidia.com/ (local) * Rewrote to new API suggestion * Split for more patches v2: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/cover.1626605893.git.leonro@nvidia.com (local) * Changed implementation of first patch, based on our discussion with * Christoph. https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/YNwaVTT0qmQdxaZz@infradead.org/ (local) v1: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/cover.1624955710.git.leonro@nvidia.com/ (local) * Fixed sg_page with a _dma_ API in the umem.c v0: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/cover.1624361199.git.leonro@nvidia.com (local) Maor Gottlieb (3): lib/scatterlist: Provide a dedicated function to support table append lib/scatterlist: Fix wrong update of orig_nents RDMA: Use the sg_table directly and remove the opencoded version from umem drivers/gpu/drm/drm_prime.c | 13 +- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_userptr.c | 11 +- drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_ttm_buffer.c | 14 +- drivers/infiniband/core/umem.c | 56 ++++--- drivers/infiniband/core/umem_dmabuf.c | 5 +- drivers/infiniband/hw/hns/hns_roce_db.c | 4 +- drivers/infiniband/hw/irdma/verbs.c | 2 +- drivers/infiniband/hw/mlx4/doorbell.c | 3 +- drivers/infiniband/hw/mlx4/mr.c | 4 +- drivers/infiniband/hw/mlx5/doorbell.c | 3 +- drivers/infiniband/hw/mlx5/mr.c | 3 +- drivers/infiniband/hw/qedr/verbs.c | 2 +- drivers/infiniband/sw/rdmavt/mr.c | 2 +- drivers/infiniband/sw/rxe/rxe_mr.c | 2 +- include/linux/scatterlist.h | 56 +++++-- include/rdma/ib_umem.h | 11 +- include/rdma/ib_verbs.h | 28 ++++ lib/scatterlist.c | 155 ++++++++++++-------- lib/sg_pool.c | 3 +- tools/testing/scatterlist/main.c | 38 +++-- 20 files changed, 258 insertions(+), 157 deletions(-)Jason, Did you add these patches to the -next? I can't find them.
They sat in linux-next for awhile outside the rdma-next tree All synced up now Jason