Re: [PATCH net-next v5 5/5] mvneta: recycle buffers
From: "Russell King (Oracle)" <linux@armlinux.org.uk>
Date: 2021-05-13 18:26:03
Also in:
bpf, linux-mm, lkml, netdev
On Thu, May 13, 2021 at 06:58:46PM +0200, Matteo Croce wrote:
From: Matteo Croce <redacted> Use the new recycling API for page_pool. In a drop rate test, the packet rate increased di 10%,
Typo - "by" ?
from 269 Kpps to 296 Kpps. perf top on a stock system shows: Overhead Shared Object Symbol 21.78% [kernel] [k] __pi___inval_dcache_area 21.66% [mvneta] [k] mvneta_rx_swbm 7.00% [kernel] [k] kmem_cache_alloc 6.05% [kernel] [k] eth_type_trans 4.44% [kernel] [k] kmem_cache_free.part.0 3.80% [kernel] [k] __netif_receive_skb_core 3.68% [kernel] [k] dev_gro_receive 3.65% [kernel] [k] get_page_from_freelist 3.43% [kernel] [k] page_pool_release_page 3.35% [kernel] [k] free_unref_page And this is the same output with recycling enabled: Overhead Shared Object Symbol 24.10% [kernel] [k] __pi___inval_dcache_area 23.02% [mvneta] [k] mvneta_rx_swbm 7.19% [kernel] [k] kmem_cache_alloc 6.50% [kernel] [k] eth_type_trans 4.93% [kernel] [k] __netif_receive_skb_core 4.77% [kernel] [k] kmem_cache_free.part.0 3.93% [kernel] [k] dev_gro_receive 3.03% [kernel] [k] build_skb 2.91% [kernel] [k] page_pool_put_page 2.85% [kernel] [k] __xdp_return The test was done with mausezahn on the TX side with 64 byte raw ethernet frames. Signed-off-by: Matteo Croce <redacted>
Other than the typo, I have no objection to the patch. Acked-by: Russell King (Oracle) <redacted>
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
--- drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mvneta.c | 11 +++++++---- 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mvneta.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mvneta.c index 7d5cd9bc6c99..6d2f8dce4900 100644 --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mvneta.c +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mvneta.c@@ -2320,7 +2320,7 @@ mvneta_swbm_add_rx_fragment(struct mvneta_port *pp, } static struct sk_buff * -mvneta_swbm_build_skb(struct mvneta_port *pp, struct mvneta_rx_queue *rxq, +mvneta_swbm_build_skb(struct mvneta_port *pp, struct page_pool *pool, struct xdp_buff *xdp, u32 desc_status) { struct skb_shared_info *sinfo = xdp_get_shared_info_from_buff(xdp);@@ -2331,7 +2331,7 @@ mvneta_swbm_build_skb(struct mvneta_port *pp, struct mvneta_rx_queue *rxq, if (!skb) return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM); - page_pool_release_page(rxq->page_pool, virt_to_page(xdp->data)); + skb_mark_for_recycle(skb, virt_to_page(xdp->data), pool); skb_reserve(skb, xdp->data - xdp->data_hard_start); skb_put(skb, xdp->data_end - xdp->data);@@ -2343,7 +2343,10 @@ mvneta_swbm_build_skb(struct mvneta_port *pp, struct mvneta_rx_queue *rxq, skb_add_rx_frag(skb, skb_shinfo(skb)->nr_frags, skb_frag_page(frag), skb_frag_off(frag), skb_frag_size(frag), PAGE_SIZE); - page_pool_release_page(rxq->page_pool, skb_frag_page(frag)); + /* We don't need to reset pp_recycle here. It's already set, so + * just mark fragments for recycling. + */ + page_pool_store_mem_info(skb_frag_page(frag), pool); } return skb;@@ -2425,7 +2428,7 @@ static int mvneta_rx_swbm(struct napi_struct *napi, mvneta_run_xdp(pp, rxq, xdp_prog, &xdp_buf, frame_sz, &ps)) goto next; - skb = mvneta_swbm_build_skb(pp, rxq, &xdp_buf, desc_status); + skb = mvneta_swbm_build_skb(pp, pp, &xdp_buf, desc_status); if (IS_ERR(skb)) { struct mvneta_pcpu_stats *stats = this_cpu_ptr(pp->stats);-- 2.31.1
-- RMK's Patch system: https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/ FTTP is here! 40Mbps down 10Mbps up. Decent connectivity at last!