Re: [PATCH] IB/srpt: Revert "Convert to percpu_ida tag allocation"
From: Christoph Hellwig <hidden>
Date: 2016-04-07 23:54:22
Started by Christoph Hellwig on Apr 7, 2016 · 2 messages from 2 authors · Last reply Apr 8, 2016
open the first message on its own page
From: Christoph Hellwig <hidden>
Date: 2016-04-07 23:54:22
On Thu, Apr 07, 2016 at 04:52:03PM -0700, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote:
Because I'm actively working on a bug-fix for the regression, and it's -rc2 in a target driver that hardly anyone cares about. If the regression is not addressed before v4.6-rc6, then by all means revert the original patch.
Stop it. People do care. At least I do for sure, and it's blocking a mayor feature I want to land in 4.7. Bart has a proper fix, and it's perfectly valid that you ask him to resend with various tweaks towards how your prefer various details to be done, but there is no reason to be agressive and personal. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
From: Nicholas A. Bellinger <hidden>
Date: 2016-04-08 00:00:02
On Thu, 2016-04-07 at 16:54 -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
On Thu, Apr 07, 2016 at 04:52:03PM -0700, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote:quoted
Because I'm actively working on a bug-fix for the regression, and it's -rc2 in a target driver that hardly anyone cares about. If the regression is not addressed before v4.6-rc6, then by all means revert the original patch.Stop it. People do care. At least I do for sure, and it's blocking a mayor feature I want to land in 4.7. Bart has a proper fix, and it's perfectly valid that you ask him to resend with various tweaks towards how your prefer various details to be done, but there is no reason to be agressive and personal.
As mentioned, I'm actively working on a -v2 for this regression.
You'll certainly be the first to hear about it as it's resolved over the
next days.