linux-rdma archive · January 2011

280 messages · showing the 100 most-recently-active threads .

• STALE5647d Re: [PATCH 00/13] opensm: Cleanups and more documentation for torus-2QoS patchset
  2011-01-31 15:35 · 1 reply this month · Sasha Khapyorsky <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies Re: RFC: Splitting of the management git tree in Open Fabrics
  2011-01-30 17:41 · 0 replies this month · Sasha Khapyorsky <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies Re: [PATCH V2] Add node/port/qos information to some error messages
  2011-01-30 14:46 · 0 replies this month · Sasha Khapyorsky <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies Re: [PATCH] RDMA/ucma: Copy iWARP route information on queries.
  2011-01-29 00:35 · 0 replies this month · Roland Dreier <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies Re: [PATCH] RDMA/nes: fix hazard of sending ibevent for unregistered device
  2011-01-29 00:33 · 0 replies this month · Roland Dreier <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies Infinihost HCA ->MTT -are they per HCA?
  2011-01-28 23:49 · 0 replies this month · Pradeep Satyanarayana <hidden>
• STALE5649d [PATCH] infiniband: hw: amso1100: Fixed compile warning.
  2011-01-28 23:48 · 2 replies this month · Ralf Thielow <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies Re: [PATCH 2/2] RDMA/cxgb4: Set the correct device physical function for iwarp connections.
  2011-01-28 23:35 · 0 replies this month · Roland Dreier <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies Re: [PATCH] IB/qib: Hold link for Tx SERDES settings
  2011-01-28 23:31 · 0 replies this month · Roland Dreier <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies [PATCH V2] Add node/port/qos information to some error messages
  2011-01-28 03:21 · 0 replies this month · Ira Weiny <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies Re: [PATCH] Add node/port information to some error messages
  2011-01-28 03:18 · 0 replies this month · Ira Weiny <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies Re: Infiniband Shared Memory Segment
  2011-01-28 00:57 · 0 replies this month · Roland Dreier <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies Re: [PATCH] Add node/port information to some error messages
  2011-01-27 21:35 · 0 replies this month · Hal Rosenstock <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies [PATCH -- resend] Add node/port information to some error messages
  2011-01-27 18:45 · 0 replies this month · Ira Weiny <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies RE: Infiniband Shared Memory Segment
  2011-01-27 16:55 · 0 replies this month · Hefty, Sean <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies Infiniband Shared Memory Segment
  2011-01-27 16:37 · 0 replies this month · Greg I Kerr <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies OFED 1.5.3 rc2 is available
  2011-01-27 13:43 · 0 replies this month · Vladimir Sokolovsky <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies Re: [PATCH V2] IB/ipoib: Leave stale send-only multicast groups
  2011-01-26 18:26 · 0 replies this month · Christoph Lameter <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies Re: [PATCH V2] IB/ipoib: Leave stale send-only multicast groups
  2011-01-26 15:55 · 0 replies this month · Christoph Lameter <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies RE: confirm d2397606efdb620e482dec08f6e35f26ddd9a5cd
  2011-01-26 15:03 · 0 replies this month · Carolyn Sher DeCusatis <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies [PATCH] Add node/port information to some error messages
  2011-01-26 01:14 · 0 replies this month · Ira Weiny <hidden>
• STALE5653d [GIT PULL] please pull infiniband.git
  2011-01-25 16:22 · 1 reply this month · Roland Dreier <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies [PATCH] RDMA/nes: fix hazard of sending ibevent for unregistered device
  2011-01-25 13:49 · 0 replies this month · Maciej Sosnowski <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies Re: IB: increase DMA max_segment_size on Mellanox hardware
  2011-01-24 19:36 · 0 replies this month · David Dillow <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies [PATCH] opensm: accept looonnng partition.conf lines
  2011-01-24 19:36 · 0 replies this month · Arthur Kepner <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies Re: [RFC 0/8] Reliably generate large request from SRP
  2011-01-24 18:00 · 0 replies this month · David Dillow <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies Re: [RFC 0/8] Reliably generate large request from SRP
  2011-01-24 17:53 · 0 replies this month · David Dillow <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies RE: ibv_post_send/recv kernel path optimizations
  2011-01-24 17:03 · 0 replies this month · Walukiewicz, Miroslaw <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies Re: [RFC 0/8] Reliably generate large request from SRP
  2011-01-24 16:14 · 0 replies this month · Bart Van Assche <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies Re: [RFC 0/8] Reliably generate large request from SRP
  2011-01-24 15:32 · 0 replies this month · Or Gerlitz <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies Re: IB: increase DMA max_segment_size on Mellanox hardware
  2011-01-24 15:18 · 0 replies this month · Or Gerlitz <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies Re: Does any load balancing mode work for IPoIB bonding?
  2011-01-23 13:51 · 0 replies this month · Tziporet Koren <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies Roland's email address
  2011-01-21 23:27 · 0 replies this month · Roland Dreier <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies Re: [PATCH V1 1/4] Rename RAW_ETY to RAW_ETHERTYPE
  2011-01-21 17:12 · 0 replies this month · Steve Wise <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies [PATCH 2/2] RDMA/cxgb4: Set the correct device physical function for iwarp connections.
  2011-01-21 17:00 · 0 replies this month · Steve Wise <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies [PATCH 1/2] RDMA/cxgb4: limit MAXBURST EQ context field to 256B.
  2011-01-21 17:00 · 0 replies this month · Steve Wise <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies RE: ibv_post_send/recv kernel path optimizations
  2011-01-21 15:49 · 0 replies this month · Hefty, Sean <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies [PATCH] IB/qib: Hold link for Tx SERDES settings
  2011-01-21 13:45 · 0 replies this month · Mike Marciniszyn <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies RE: ibv_post_send/recv kernel path optimizations
  2011-01-21 11:41 · 0 replies this month · Walukiewicz, Miroslaw <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies [PATCH] RDMA/ucma: Copy iWARP route information on queries.
  2011-01-21 03:40 · 0 replies this month · Steve Wise <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies [PATCH] dapl-2.0: ucm, scm: exchange max_qp_rd_atom and limit outstanding requests
  2011-01-21 02:52 · 0 replies this month · Davis, Arlin R <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies [PATCH] dapl-2.0: common: reduce default max inline data size because of performance anomaly
  2011-01-21 02:50 · 0 replies this month · Davis, Arlin R <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies [PATCH] dapl-2.0: common: dapls_evd_dto_wait() dbg message should print status and not errno
  2011-01-21 02:50 · 0 replies this month · Davis, Arlin R <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies [PATCH 2/2] Update ibcheckerrors manpage for -T option
  2011-01-20 22:42 · 0 replies this month · Lloyd Brown <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies [PATCH 1/2] Update ibcheckerrors to accept thresholds file
  2011-01-20 22:42 · 0 replies this month · Lloyd Brown <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies [PATCH 0/2] Add threshold file option to ibcheckerrors
  2011-01-20 22:42 · 0 replies this month · Lloyd Brown <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies Re: [RFC 0/8] Reliably generate large request from SRP
  2011-01-20 17:50 · 0 replies this month · Roland Dreier <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies Re: question about Priority Flow Control and RDMA
  2011-01-20 17:45 · 0 replies this month · Roland Dreier <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies Re: [RFC 0/8] Reliably generate large request from SRP
  2011-01-20 12:54 · 0 replies this month · David Dillow <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies Re: [RFC 7/8] IB/srp: try to use larger FMR sizes to cover our mappings
  2011-01-20 12:40 · 0 replies this month · David Dillow <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies Re: [RFC 4/8] IB/srp: rework mapping engine to use multiple FMR entries
  2011-01-20 12:36 · 0 replies this month · David Dillow <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies Re: [RFC 8/8] IB/srp and direct IO: patches for testing large indirect tables
  2011-01-20 12:33 · 0 replies this month · David Dillow <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies Re: IB: increase DMA max_segment_size on Mellanox hardware
  2011-01-20 12:25 · 0 replies this month · David Dillow <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies Re: IB: increase DMA max_segment_size on Mellanox hardware
  2011-01-20 12:15 · 0 replies this month · David Dillow <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies Re: [RFC 7/8] IB/srp: try to use larger FMR sizes to cover our mappings
  2011-01-20 10:24 · 0 replies this month · Or Gerlitz <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies Re: IB: increase DMA max_segment_size on Mellanox hardware
  2011-01-20 10:18 · 0 replies this month · Or Gerlitz <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies Re: IB: increase DMA max_segment_size on Mellanox hardware
  2011-01-20 10:14 · 0 replies this month · Or Gerlitz <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies Re: [RFC 8/8] IB/srp and direct IO: patches for testing large indirect tables
  2011-01-20 10:07 · 0 replies this month · Or Gerlitz <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies Re: [RFC 4/8] IB/srp: rework mapping engine to use multiple FMR entries
  2011-01-20 10:04 · 0 replies this month · Or Gerlitz <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies Re: [RFC 0/8] Reliably generate large request from SRP
  2011-01-20 09:52 · 0 replies this month · Or Gerlitz <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies question about Priority Flow Control and RDMA
  2011-01-20 09:05 · 0 replies this month · Andrea Gozzelino <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies [PATCH] libmlx4: Add new device IDs
  2011-01-19 15:13 · 0 replies this month · Vladimir Sokolovsky <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies Re: Problems with ibv_post_send and completion queues
  2011-01-19 14:03 · 0 replies this month · Manoj Nambiar <hidden>
• STALE5659d Problems with ibv_post_send and completion queues
  2011-01-19 13:21 · 1 reply this month · Manoj Nambiar <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies Re: [RFC 0/8] Reliably generate large request from SRP
  2011-01-19 12:01 · 0 replies this month · David Dillow <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies Re: [RFC 0/8] Reliably generate large request from SRP
  2011-01-19 05:31 · 0 replies this month · Roland Dreier <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies [RFC 8/8] IB/srp and direct IO: patches for testing large indirect tables
  2011-01-19 04:27 · 0 replies this month · David Dillow <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies [RFC 7/8] IB/srp: try to use larger FMR sizes to cover our mappings
  2011-01-19 04:27 · 0 replies this month · David Dillow <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies [RFC 6/8] IB/srp: add support for indirect tables that don't fit in SRP_CMD
  2011-01-19 04:27 · 0 replies this month · David Dillow <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies [RFC 5/8] IB/srp: add safety valve for large SG tables without HW support
  2011-01-19 04:27 · 0 replies this month · David Dillow <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies [RFC 4/8] IB/srp: rework mapping engine to use multiple FMR entries
  2011-01-19 04:27 · 0 replies this month · David Dillow <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies [RFC 3/8] IB/srp: allow sg_tablesize to be set for each target
  2011-01-19 04:27 · 0 replies this month · David Dillow <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies [RFC 2/8] IB/srp: move IB CM setup completion into its own function
  2011-01-19 04:27 · 0 replies this month · David Dillow <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies [RFC 1/8] IB/srp: always avoid non-zero offsets into an FMR
  2011-01-19 04:27 · 0 replies this month · David Dillow <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies [RFC 0/8] Reliably generate large request from SRP
  2011-01-19 04:27 · 0 replies this month · David Dillow <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies Re: [PATCH] RDMA/ucma: Copy iWARP route information.
  2011-01-18 23:16 · 0 replies this month · Steve Wise <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies RE: [PATCH] RDMA/ucma: Copy iWARP route information.
  2011-01-18 23:14 · 0 replies this month · Hefty, Sean <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies Re: [PATCH] RDMA/ucma: Copy iWARP route information.
  2011-01-18 21:56 · 0 replies this month · Steve Wise <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies Re: [PATCH V2] IB/ipoib: Leave stale send-only multicast groups
  2011-01-18 20:09 · 0 replies this month · Christoph Lameter <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies Re: [ewg] Mellanox target workaround in SRP
  2011-01-18 20:05 · 0 replies this month · David Dillow <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies Re: [ewg] Mellanox target workaround in SRP
  2011-01-18 19:53 · 0 replies this month · Vu Pham <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies Re: IB: increase DMA max_segment_size on Mellanox hardware
  2011-01-18 18:01 · 0 replies this month · Jason Gunthorpe <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies Re: IB: increase DMA max_segment_size on Mellanox hardware
  2011-01-18 12:25 · 0 replies this month · David Dillow <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies Re: [PATCH V4 5/6] RDMA CM: Netlink Client
  2011-01-18 07:26 · 0 replies this month · Or Gerlitz <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies Re: IB: increase DMA max_segment_size on Mellanox hardware
  2011-01-18 07:16 · 0 replies this month · Or Gerlitz <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies Re: IB: increase DMA max_segment_size on Mellanox hardware
  2011-01-18 05:22 · 0 replies this month · Jason Gunthorpe <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies Re: IB: increase DMA max_segment_size on Mellanox hardware
  2011-01-18 02:46 · 0 replies this month · David Dillow <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies AF_IB and MAD snooping patches
  2011-01-17 23:46 · 0 replies this month · Hefty, Sean <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies Re: [PATCH V4 5/6] RDMA CM: Netlink Client
  2011-01-17 22:33 · 0 replies this month · Jason Gunthorpe <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies Re: [PATCH V4 5/6] RDMA CM: Netlink Client
  2011-01-17 22:14 · 0 replies this month · Roland Dreier <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies Re: [PATCH V4 5/6] RDMA CM: Netlink Client
  2011-01-17 22:11 · 0 replies this month · Jason Gunthorpe <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies Re: [PATCH V4 5/6] RDMA CM: Netlink Client
  2011-01-17 21:59 · 0 replies this month · Roland Dreier <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies Re: [PATCH V2] IB/ipoib: Leave stale send-only multicast groups
  2011-01-17 11:30 · 0 replies this month · Or Gerlitz <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies Re: IB: increase DMA max_segment_size on Mellanox hardware
  2011-01-17 11:16 · 0 replies this month · Or Gerlitz <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies [PATCH V2] IB/ipoib: Leave stale send-only multicast groups
  2011-01-17 11:10 · 0 replies this month · Moni Shoua <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies Re: [PATCH V4 5/6] RDMA CM: Netlink Client
  2011-01-17 10:20 · 0 replies this month · Or Gerlitz <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies Re: [ewg] Mellanox target workaround in SRP
  2011-01-17 04:50 · 0 replies this month · David Dillow <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies IB: increase DMA max_segment_size on Mellanox hardware
  2011-01-17 02:09 · 0 replies this month · David Dillow <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies Attention Email Users!! Account Expires in 24hurs
  2011-01-15 01:42 · 0 replies this month · Satterfield, Melissa J. <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies Re: mlx4 fix for 36-bit bus addresses on 32-bit arch
  2011-01-14 22:40 · 0 replies this month · Jason Gunthorpe <hidden>