# Re: Fault tolerance with badblocks

- From: Nix \<hidden\>
- Date: 2017-05-09 21:22:10 
- List: linux-raid
- Page: https://ratatoskr.run/linux-raid/2017/05/6635579
- Thread: https://ratatoskr.run/linux-raid/2017/05/6635579/t.md

```text
On 9 May 2017, Wols Lists told this:

> On 09/05/17 21:01, Nix wrote:
>> Gee, thanks heaps. Next time I want randomly insulting by someone who
>> doesn't bother to tell me his actual *arguments* in any message before
>> the one that starts on the insults, I'll come straight to you.
>
> Nix, much as I don't think people are thinking this through rationally
> (they live in the perfect world of maths, not the imperfect world of
> engineering), I do NOT think insulting Phil on this list is a good idea.

Errr... sure, but I may be ignorant, but I'm not obtuse. Not as far as I
know, anyway. What I am is sleep-deprived. (It takes a special kind of
nervous wreck to be kept awake by a problem like this, that has never
happened in many years of my using md/raid. I think I'll be kept awake
by the possibility of an asteroid strike or a second Carrington Event
tonight.)

> Can we all tone it down, please ...

Sure! I'm generating untested patches now, is that better? (Probably
not. But they do solve this problem enough to reduce the worry quotient
without actually doing the much-more-complex repair side of things.)

-- 
NULL && (void)
```