# Re: Intel SSD or other brands

- From: Peter Grandi \<hidden\>
- Date: 2016-12-29 17:33:17 
- List: linux-raid
- Page: https://ratatoskr.run/linux-raid/2016/12/6634031
- Thread: https://ratatoskr.run/linux-raid/2016/12/6634026/t.md

```text
> [ ... ] sync=1 really differentiates drives and you really
> find which drives are better. [ ... ]

It is not necessarily "better" in a strict sense: flash SSD
devices with supercapacitor-backed persistent caches can be much
faster on 'fsync' heavy workloads, but also cost a lot more
(probably mostly because of market segmentation). Of course
especially on a RAID5 set with lots of read-modify-write.

It is a different performance envelope, not necessarily a
"better" one. If one does not need small-write speed then
cheaper drivers are more appropriate.

However devices which don't have persistent caches and still
have high 'sync=1'/'direct=1' speed because they don't implement
'fsync' synchronously are definitely worse, in the sense of
having arguably no performance at all.

Some manufacturers think that using an SLC cache helps without a
persistent-ed RAM cache, but the persistent=-ed RAM seems a lot
better to me.
```