# Re: \[PATCH v2 mdadm\] raid6check.c: fix "misleading-indentation" error

- From: Jes Sorensen \<hidden\>
- Date: 2016-10-26 16:00:24 
- List: linux-raid
- Page: https://ratatoskr.run/linux-raid/2016/10/6633188
- Thread: https://ratatoskr.run/linux-raid/2016/10/6633188/t.md

```text
Yilong Ren [ref] writes:
> To fix the following error info:
>
> root@vm-lkp-nex04-8G-7 /tmp/mdadm# make test
> cc -Wall -Werror -Wstrict-prototypes -Wextra -Wno-unused-parameter -ggdb -DSendmail=\""/usr/sbin/sendmail -t"\" -DCONFFILE=\"/etc/mdadm.conf\" -DCONFFILE2=\"/etc/mdadm/mdadm.conf\" -DMAP_DIR=\"/run/mdadm\" -DMAP_FILE=\"map\" -DMDMON_DIR=\"/run/mdadm\" -DFAILED_SLOTS_DIR=\"/run/mdadm/failed-slots\" -DNO_COROSYNC -DNO_DLM -DVERSION=\"3.4-43-g1dcee1c\" -DVERS_DATE="\"06th April 2016\"" -DUSE_PTHREADS -DBINDIR=\"/sbin\"  -c -o raid6check.o raid6check.c
> raid6check.c: In function 'manual_repair':
> raid6check.c:267:4: error: this 'else' clause does not guard... [-Werror=misleading-indentation]
>     else
>     ^~~~
> raid6check.c:269:5: note: ...this statement, but the latter is misleadingly indented as if it is guarded by the 'else'
>      printf("Repairing D(%d) and P\n", failed_data);
>      ^~~~~~
> cc1: all warnings being treated as errors
> <builtin>: recipe for target 'raid6check.o' failed
> make: *** [raid6check.o] Error 1
> root@vm-lkp-nex04-8G-7 /tmp/mdadm# 
>
>
> Cc: NeilBrown <redacted>
> Cc: linux-raid <redacted>
> Cc: LKP <redacted>
> Reviewed-by: Jes Sorensen <redacted>
> Signed-off-by: Yilong Ren <redacted>
> ---
>  raid6check.c | 3 ++-
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

Applied!

However, in the future I would much prefer a sane commit message rather
than this auto generated noise which doesn't do a good job describing
the change.

Jes
```