32-bit sys/times.h incorrect return value
From: Jan Wagner <hidden>
Date: 2009-08-13 09:10:27
Hi, we see times() return a really large positive value like 0x66693CF1 i.e. signed int32 +1718172913 just a few minutes after booting. Note that clock_gettime(CLOCK_MONOTONIC) works correctly and returns the uptime. While times() +1718172913/100Hz time is in no relation to uptime. Checking 'man 2 times': "Since Linux 2.6, this point is (2^32/HZ) - 300 (i.e., about 429 million) seconds before system boot time. [...] the returned value may overflow the range of clock_t [...]" Hence in theory on a 32-bit platform where clock_t is signed 32-bit, at first times() should return negative values. Then 300 seconds later they should become positive. Correct? This should also happen via glibc times() call. There the times() ./sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/times.c simply does clock_t ret = INTERNAL_SYSCALL (times, err, 1, buf); with no extra "+- some constant". In the kernel all jiffies and times syscall related handling is 64-bit: --------- amn@multics:/home/etu/Desktop/linux-2.6.30.3/include$ fgrep INITIAL_JIFFIES linux/jiffies.h:#define INITIAL_JIFFIES ((unsigned long)(unsigned int) (-300*HZ)) kernel/sys.c: return (long) jiffies_64_to_clock_t(get_jiffies_64()); kernel/time.c:u64 get_jiffies_64(void) kernel/time.c: ret = jiffies_64; --------- On 32-bit platforms and signed int32 clock_t it should take at least octave:1> 2^31/(24*60*60 * 100) ans = 248.55 octave:2> (2^31/100 - 300)/(24*60*60) ans = 248.55 days until the positive times() return value wraps back to smallest negative signed 32-bit int. However, two bugs(?) : 1) times() return value after 1080 'uptime' seconds is 0x66693CF1, why? Expected value would be (1080-300)*100Hz = 78000 = 0x000130B0 ! 2) the times() wraps to negative only after 50 days uptime. Following the intention of INITIAL_JIFFIES, how is this 50-day warp supposed to reveal wrapping bugs right at 300 seconds after boot? 2) on 64-bit platforms, clock_t is 64-bit. There times() does not wrap after 50 days, however it still starts at 0x000000006669**** !? Any ideas? - Jan