linux-raid archive · October 2008

247 messages across 80 threads, ordered by last activity .

• STALE6481d Re: RFC - device names and mdadm with some reference to udev.
  2008-10-31 23:08 · 5 replies this month · Neil Brown <hidden>
• STALE6481d Re: Adaptec raid congtrollers for SATA disks under software raid
  2008-10-31 19:58 · 1 reply this month · Mike Myers <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies Re: Adaptec raid congtrollers for SATA disks under software raid
  2008-10-31 19:23 · 0 replies this month · Mike Myers <hidden>
• STALE6481d Re: Adaptec raid congtrollers for SATA disks under software raid
  2008-10-31 18:48 · 1 reply this month · Mike Myers <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies Bug in mdadm 2.6.7
  2008-10-31 13:41 · 0 replies this month · Vladislav Konecny <hidden>
• STALE6482d Adaptec raid congtrollers for SATA disks under software raid
  2008-10-31 12:22 · 4 replies this month · Mike Myers <hidden>
• STALE6478d Re: RFC - device names and mdadm with some reference to udev.
  2008-10-31 09:45 · 0 replies this month · Neil Brown <hidden>
• STALE6479d Re: RFC - device names and mdadm with some reference to udev.
  2008-10-31 09:18 · 0 replies this month · Neil Brown <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies Re: Adaptec raid congtrollers for SATA disks under software raid
  2008-10-31 05:21 · 0 replies this month · David Lethe <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies [PULL REQUEST] one more fix for md: destroy partitions when stopping an array.
  2008-10-31 01:05 · 0 replies this month · Neil Brown <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies Re: RFC - device names and mdadm with some reference to udev.
  2008-10-31 01:02 · 0 replies this month · <hidden>
• STALE6482d diskspotting (how to tell the dead one?)
  2008-10-30 21:33 · 6 replies this month · Dexter Filmore <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies mdadm --grow
  2008-10-30 18:09 · 0 replies this month · Greg Freemyer <hidden>
• STALE6482d Re: [Patch mdadm-2.6.7.1 0/3] Misc fixes for mdadm-2.6.7.1
  2008-10-30 17:40 · 1 reply this month · Neil Brown <hidden>
• STALE6479d RFC - device names and mdadm with some reference to udev.
  2008-10-30 17:18 · 18 replies this month · Neil Brown <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies Re: [mdadm git pull] "--assemble --scan" support for imsm
  2008-10-30 12:43 · 0 replies this month · Neil Brown <hidden>
• STALE6479d Re: [mdadm git pull] "--assemble --scan" support for imsm
  2008-10-30 03:42 · 0 replies this month · Neil Brown <hidden>
• STALE6483d Re: [Patch mdadm-2.6.7.1 0/3] Misc fixes for mdadm-2.6.7.1
  2008-10-29 23:14 · 1 reply this month · Neil Brown <hidden>
• STALE6477d Re: mdadm degraded RAID5 failure
  2008-10-29 22:16 · 2 replies this month · Neil Brown <hidden>
• STALE6483d [Patch mdadm-2.6.7.1 0/3] Misc fixes for mdadm-2.6.7.1
  2008-10-29 19:05 · 3 replies this month · Doug Ledford <hidden>
• STALE6483d Re: RFC - device names and mdadm with some reference to udev.
  2008-10-29 18:49 · 1 reply this month · Neil Brown <hidden>
• STALE6483d Re: [mdadm git pull] "--assemble --scan" support for imsm
  2008-10-29 16:12 · 1 reply this month · Neil Brown <hidden>
• STALE6484d question on how to (correctly) build an initrd for a root disk on a RAID1
  2008-10-29 12:13 · 14 replies this month · Joe Landman <hidden>
• STALE6467d And again help on deciphering an error
  2008-10-29 08:08 · 1 reply this month · Peter Rabbitson <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies [mdadm git pull] "--assemble --scan" support for imsm
  2008-10-28 21:44 · 0 replies this month · Dan Williams <hidden>
• STALE6485d dmraid - where is the raid done?
  2008-10-28 12:10 · 7 replies this month · Brian J. Murrell <hidden>
• STALE6485d Re: RFC - device names and mdadm with some reference to udev.
  2008-10-28 01:54 · 2 replies this month · Neil Brown <hidden>
• STALE6485d Re: RFC - device names and mdadm with some reference to udev.
  2008-10-28 01:16 · 1 reply this month · Neil Brown <hidden>
• STALE6485d Re: RFC - device names and mdadm with some reference to udev.
  2008-10-28 00:20 · 1 reply this month · Neil Brown <hidden>
• STALE6485d RE: RFC - device names and mdadm with some reference to udev.
  2008-10-27 23:48 · 1 reply this month · Neil Brown <hidden>
• STALE6485d Re: RFC - device names and mdadm with some reference to udev.
  2008-10-27 22:51 · 1 reply this month · Neil Brown <hidden>
• STALE6487d Proactive Drive Replacement
  2008-10-25 16:33 · 15 replies this month · Jon Nelson <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies multiple raid 5 arrays using multiple partitions
  2008-10-25 10:03 · 0 replies this month · Adeel N <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies Re: HELP! my raid5 ate my data!
  2008-10-25 06:49 · 0 replies this month · Neil Brown <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies Re: can I replace spin lock of stripe with mutex?
  2008-10-25 05:19 · 0 replies this month · Neil Brown <hidden>
• STALE6488d mdadm degraded RAID5 failure
  2008-10-24 18:47 · 1 reply this month · Steve Evans <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies [PULL REQUEST] supplementary md patches for 2.6.28
  2008-10-24 04:43 · 0 replies this month · Neil Brown <hidden>
• STALE6466d mail notification of raid problems on 2.6.12
  2008-10-23 13:40 · 0 replies this month · Keld Jørn Simonsen <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies bad block checking and repair
  2008-10-23 12:31 · 0 replies this month · Keld Jørn Simonsen <hidden>
• STALE6490d backup using raid
  2008-10-23 08:09 · 1 reply this month · Max Waterman <hidden>
• STALE6490d initiate consistency check using mdadm
  2008-10-22 21:43 · 1 reply this month · Mattias Hellström <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies Re: aoe freezes 2.6.26.6
  2008-10-21 17:21 · 0 replies this month · Ferenc Wagner <hidden>
• STALE6491d Possible Bug in MD?
  2008-10-21 17:16 · 1 reply this month · Jon Nelson <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies Re: HELP! my raid5 ate my data!
  2008-10-21 16:54 · 0 replies this month · Raz <hidden>
• STALE6491d HELP! my raid5 ate my data!
  2008-10-21 16:44 · 3 replies this month · Morgan Wahl <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies change order of component devices
  2008-10-20 20:42 · 0 replies this month · <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies aoe freezes 2.6.26.6
  2008-10-20 17:12 · 0 replies this month · Ferenc Wagner <hidden>
• STALE6493d Re: RAID 0 md device still active after pulled drive
  2008-10-20 09:21 · 2 replies this month · Neil Brown <hidden>
• STALE6493d [PATCH 0/9] md: Make raid0 use sector-based quantities
  2008-10-20 08:56 · 9 replies this month · Andre Noll <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies Re: Potential mdadm 2.6.7 bug: Cannot grow linear arrays with superblock v1.0, 1.1, or 1.2
  2008-10-20 01:15 · 0 replies this month · Neil Brown <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies Re: Distributed spares
  2008-10-20 01:11 · 0 replies this month · Neil Brown <hidden>
• STALE6494d [PATCH 0/8] md: Make raid0 use sector-based quantities
  2008-10-18 15:24 · 8 replies this month · Andre Noll <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies RAID 0 md device still active after pulled drive
  2008-10-18 00:29 · 0 replies this month · <hidden>
• STALE6495d Re: Raid array is not automatically detected.
  2008-10-17 18:40 · 1 reply this month · Daniel Reichelt <hidden>
• STALE6495d RAID 0, disks swapped ?
  2008-10-17 17:44 · 9 replies this month · <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies [PATCH] MD data integrity support
  2008-10-17 14:39 · 0 replies this month · "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>
• STALE6495d Re: Distributed spares
  2008-10-17 13:46 · 4 replies this month · Neil Brown <hidden>
• STALE6496d Re: Potential mdadm 2.6.7 bug: Cannot grow linear arrays with superblock v1.0, 1.1, or 1.2
  2008-10-17 12:50 · 1 reply this month · Neil Brown <hidden>
• STALE6496d [2.6 patch] init/do_mounts_md.c must #include <linux/delay.h>
  2008-10-16 22:41 · 1 reply this month · Adrian Bunk <bunk@kernel.org>
• DORMANTno replies Re: PULL REQUEST assorted md fixes etc for 2.6.28
  2008-10-16 06:09 · 0 replies this month · Neil Brown <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies PULL REQUEST assorted md fixes etc for 2.6.28
  2008-10-16 04:12 · 0 replies this month · Neil Brown <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies [git pull] updates for mdadm-3.0 and imsm support
  2008-10-15 23:26 · 0 replies this month · Dan Williams <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies OT:backup
  2008-10-15 06:35 · 0 replies this month · Max Waterman <hidden>
• STALE6498d Distributed spares
  2008-10-14 23:20 · 6 replies this month · Bill Davidsen <hidden>
• STALE6498d Re: Distributed spares
  2008-10-14 17:20 · 5 replies this month · David Lethe <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies Potential mdadm 2.6.7 bug: Cannot grow linear arrays with superblock v1.0, 1.1, or 1.2
  2008-10-14 16:28 · 0 replies this month · <hidden>
• STALE6498d Re: Distributed spares
  2008-10-14 13:20 · 2 replies this month · "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>
• DORMANTno replies Re: /sys/block/md0 still present after mdadm -S and -r
  2008-10-13 00:56 · 0 replies this month · Neil Brown <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies Re: [Resend] [PATCH] md: Fix rdev_size_store with size = 0
  2008-10-13 00:54 · 0 replies this month · Neil Brown <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies Re: Is raid6 reshape (grow) supported?
  2008-10-13 00:26 · 0 replies this month · Neil Brown <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies Re: Confused About Results of Constructing raid10 Array
  2008-10-13 00:25 · 0 replies this month · Neil Brown <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies Confused About Results of Constructing raid10 Array
  2008-10-11 14:27 · 0 replies this month · Trebor A. Rude <hidden>
• STALE6502d exception Emask 0x0 SAct 0x1 / SErr 0x0 action 0x2 frozen
  2008-10-10 19:29 · 10 replies this month · Justin Piszcz <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies Problems booting from an Adaptec 2010s in 2.6.26
  2008-10-10 12:52 · 0 replies this month · Hibbard T. Smith, JR <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies Is raid6 reshape (grow) supported?
  2008-10-10 02:53 · 0 replies this month · Matt 'Murph' Finnicum <hidden>
• STALE6504d [PATCH] [VFS] mark bio_split_pool static
  2008-10-09 06:58 · 1 reply this month · Denis ChengRq <hidden>
• STALE6505d Determining filename from absolute sector failure in raid0
  2008-10-07 19:04 · 3 replies this month · Bryce <hidden>
• STALE6506d Re: Trouble increasing md component size
  2008-10-07 12:40 · 1 reply this month · Neil Brown <hidden>
• STALE6506d RAID issue (Fedora 9 issue?)
  2008-10-06 19:28 · 3 replies this month · Jeffrey Ross <hidden>
• STALE6509d SATA errors?
  2008-10-03 16:13 · 9 replies this month · Danilo Godec <hidden>