# Re: \[PATCH\] cpuidle: set poll\_limit\_ns out of if-else

- From: Rafael J. Wysocki \<rafael@kernel.org\>
- Date: 2021-08-04 17:22:54 
- List: linux-pm
- Page: https://ratatoskr.run/linux-pm/2021/08/1467987
- Thread: https://ratatoskr.run/linux-pm/2021/07/1456239/t.md

```text
On Fri, Jul 23, 2021 at 8:28 PM Pankaj Gupta
[ref] wrote:
>
> From: Pankaj Gupta <redacted>
>
>  Since poll_limit_ns is being set at the end of both if and else statement.

But they are if () and else if (), so not really.

>  Moving and setting it out at one place.
>
> Signed-off-by: Pankaj Gupta <redacted>
> ---
>  drivers/cpuidle/governors/haltpoll.c | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/cpuidle/governors/haltpoll.c b/drivers/cpuidle/governors/haltpoll.c
> index cb2a96eafc02..7d0e95bc94f3 100644
> --- a/drivers/cpuidle/governors/haltpoll.c
> +++ b/drivers/cpuidle/governors/haltpoll.c
> @@ -90,7 +90,6 @@ static void adjust_poll_limit(struct cpuidle_device *dev, u64 block_ns)
>                 if (val > guest_halt_poll_ns)
>                         val = guest_halt_poll_ns;
>
> -               dev->poll_limit_ns = val;
>         } else if (block_ns > guest_halt_poll_ns &&
>                    guest_halt_poll_allow_shrink) {
>                 unsigned int shrink = guest_halt_poll_shrink;
> @@ -100,8 +99,9 @@ static void adjust_poll_limit(struct cpuidle_device *dev, u64 block_ns)
>                         val = 0;
>                 else
>                         val /= shrink;
> -               dev->poll_limit_ns = val;
>         }
> +
> +       dev->poll_limit_ns = val;
>  }
>
>  /**
> --
> 2.25.1
>
```