[PATCH] Documentation: cpufreq: Update supported powernv processors

Signed-off-by: Shilpasri G Bhat <redacted>
---
 Documentation/cpu-freq/user-guide.txt | 4 +++-
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/Documentation/cpu-freq/user-guide.txt b/Documentation/cpu-freq/user-guide.txt
index 109e97b..5e10d5f 100644
--- a/Documentation/cpu-freq/user-guide.txt
+++ b/Documentation/cpu-freq/user-guide.txt

@@ -87,7 +87,9 @@ UltraSPARC-III
 -------
 
 Several "PowerBook" and "iBook2" notebooks are supported.
-
+The following POWER processors are supported in powernv mode:
+POWER8
+POWER9
 
 1.5 SuperH
 ----------

-- 
1.8.3.1

On 16-12-16, 16:47, Shilpasri G Bhat wrote:

Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>

-- 
viresh

On Mon, 2 Jan 2017 12:38:15 +0530
Viresh Kumar [off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

+The following POWER processors are supported in powernv mode:
+POWER8
+POWER9

I've applied this to the docs tree, thanks.

jon

On Wednesday, January 04, 2017 02:35:27 PM Jonathan Corbet wrote:

On Mon, 2 Jan 2017 12:38:15 +0530
Viresh Kumar [off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

quoted

+The following POWER processors are supported in powernv mode:
+POWER8
+POWER9

I've applied this to the docs tree, thanks.

OK

I'm assuming then, that you're going to handle cpufreq docs changes in the
future.

Some cpufreq patches update the docs too, though, so there may be changes in
there coming from two sources.

Thanks,
Rafael

On Wed, 04 Jan 2017 23:11:30 +0100
"Rafael J. Wysocki" [off-list ref] wrote:

I'm assuming then, that you're going to handle cpufreq docs changes in the
future.

Some cpufreq patches update the docs too, though, so there may be changes in
there coming from two sources.

I saw it wasn't in linux-next yet, so figured I had to. :)

If you'd rather I stayed away from there, I'll happily do so, just say
the word (and preferably send a MAINTAINERS update :).

Thanks,

jon

On Wed, Jan 4, 2017 at 11:20 PM, Jonathan Corbet [off-list ref] wrote:

On Wed, 04 Jan 2017 23:11:30 +0100
"Rafael J. Wysocki" [off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

I'm assuming then, that you're going to handle cpufreq docs changes in the
future.

Some cpufreq patches update the docs too, though, so there may be changes in
there coming from two sources.

I saw it wasn't in linux-next yet, so figured I had to. :)

Well, it actually is there in my linux-next branch and I was going to
include it in the next pull request.

Still, I can drop it easily enough. :-)

If you'd rather I stayed away from there, I'll happily do so, just say
the word (and preferably send a MAINTAINERS update :).

I can handle cpufreq docs updates, but if you think it's better to
route them via the docs tree, that would be fine by me too.

Thanks,
Rafael