[PATCH] cpufreq: conservative: Fix comment explaining frequency updates
DORMANTno replies
From: Stratos Karafotis <hidden>
Date: 2016-11-16 19:13:32
Also in:
lkml
Subsystem:
cpu frequency scaling framework, the rest · Maintainers:
"Rafael J. Wysocki", Viresh Kumar, Linus Torvalds
The original comment about the frequency increase to maximum is wrong. Both increase and decrease happen at steps. Signed-off-by: Stratos Karafotis <redacted> --- drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_conservative.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_conservative.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_conservative.c
index a48b724..7522ec6 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_conservative.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_conservative.c@@ -55,8 +55,8 @@ static inline unsigned int get_freq_step(struct cs_dbs_tuners *cs_tuners, * sampling_down_factor, we check, if current idle time is more than 80% * (default), then we try to decrease frequency * - * Any frequency increase takes it to the maximum frequency. Frequency reduction - * happens at minimum steps of 5% (default) of maximum frequency + * Frequency updates happen at minimum steps of 5% (default) of maximum + * frequency */ static unsigned int cs_dbs_update(struct cpufreq_policy *policy) {
--
2.7.4