Thread (11 messages) 11 messages, 5 authors, 2016-02-25

Re: [PATCH 1/1] intel_pstate: Increase hold-off time before busyness is scaled

From: Pandruvada, Srinivas <hidden>
Date: 2016-02-18 23:29:56
Also in: lkml

On Thu, 2016-02-18 at 20:43 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
Hi Mel,

On Thu, Feb 18, 2016 at 12:11 PM, Mel Gorman
[off-list ref] wrote:

[cut]
quoted
Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <redacted>
---
 drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c
b/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c
index cd83d477e32d..54250084174a 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c
@@ -999,7 +999,7 @@ static inline int32_t
get_target_pstate_use_performance(struct cpudata *cpu)
        sample_time = pid_params.sample_rate_ms  * USEC_PER_MSEC;
        duration_us = ktime_us_delta(cpu->sample.time,
                                     cpu->last_sample_time);
-       if (duration_us > sample_time * 3) {
+       if (duration_us > sample_time * 12) {
                sample_ratio = div_fp(int_tofp(sample_time),
                                      int_tofp(duration_us));
                core_busy = mul_fp(core_busy, sample_ratio);
--
I've been considering making a change like this, but I wasn't quite
sure how much greater the multiplier should be, so I've queued this
one up for 4.6.
We need to test power impact on different server workloads. So please
hold on.
We have server folks complaining that we already consume too much
power.

Thanks,
Srinivas
That said please note that we're planning to make one significant
change to intel_pstate in the 4.6 cycle that's very likely to affect
your results.

It is currently present in linux-next (commit 402c43ed2d74 "cpufreq:
intel_pstate: Replace timers with utilization update callbacks" in
the
linux-next branch of the linux-pm.git tree, that depends on commit
fe7034338ba0 "cpufreq: Add mechanism for registering utilization
update callbacks" in the same branch).  Also you can just pull from
the pm-cpufreq-test branch in linux-pm.git, but that contains much
more material.

Thanks,
Rafael
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pm"
in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help