thermal sensor numbering change intended ?

2 messages, 1 author, 2014-11-28 · open the first message on its own page

thermal sensor numbering change intended ?

From: Toralf Förster <hidden>
Date: 2014-11-24 16:37:21

At a dedicated server (i3770) I'm realized today that the sensors # have been switched between 3.17.3 and .4.

With 4 I do have :
# tail -v /sys/devices/virtual/thermal/thermal_zone?/temp
==> /sys/devices/virtual/thermal/thermal_zone0/temp <==
64000

==> /sys/devices/virtual/thermal/thermal_zone1/temp <==
27800

==> /sys/devices/virtual/thermal/thermal_zone2/temp <==
29800


whereas with with 3.17.3 the highest temperature (about 60°) was shown at sensor 2.

Intended or a regression ?

-- 
Toralf
pgp key: 0076 E94E

Re: thermal sensor numbering change intended ?

From: Toralf Förster <hidden>
Date: 2014-11-28 09:57:14

On 11/24/2014 05:37 PM, Toralf Förster wrote:
At a dedicated server (i3770) I'm realized today that the sensors # have been switched between 3.17.3 and .4.

With 4 I do have :
# tail -v /sys/devices/virtual/thermal/thermal_zone?/temp
==> /sys/devices/virtual/thermal/thermal_zone0/temp <==
64000

==> /sys/devices/virtual/thermal/thermal_zone1/temp <==
27800

==> /sys/devices/virtual/thermal/thermal_zone2/temp <==
29800


whereas with with 3.17.3 the highest temperature (about 60°) was shown at sensor 2.

Intended or a regression ?
Hhm,
booting now into the same hardened kernel version, but new revision-r1 (new grsec patch) reverts it again, now I do have:

# tail -v /sys/devices/virtual/thermal/thermal_zone?/temp
==> /sys/devices/virtual/thermal/thermal_zone0/temp <==
27800

==> /sys/devices/virtual/thermal/thermal_zone1/temp <==
29800

==> /sys/devices/virtual/thermal/thermal_zone2/temp <==
67000


-- 
Toralf
pgp key: 0076 E94E
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help