linux-pm archive · July 2011

365 messages · showing the 100 most-recently-active threads .

• STALE5447d [PATCH 4/9] PM / Domains: Make pm_genpd_poweron() always survive parent removal
  2011-07-31 17:53 · 0 replies this month · Rafael J. Wysocki <hidden>
• STALE5447d [PATCH 9/9] ARM / shmobile: Make A3RV be a subdomain of A4LC on SH7372
  2011-07-31 17:52 · 0 replies this month · Rafael J. Wysocki <hidden>
• STALE5447d [PATCH 8/9] PM / Domains: Rename second argument of pm_genpd_add_subdomain()
  2011-07-31 17:52 · 0 replies this month · Rafael J. Wysocki <hidden>
• STALE5447d [PATCH 7/9] PM / Domains: Rename GPD_STATE_WAIT_PARENT to GPD_STATE_WAIT_MASTER
  2011-07-31 17:51 · 0 replies this month · Rafael J. Wysocki <hidden>
• STALE5447d [PATCH 6/9] PM / Domains: Allow generic PM domains to have multiple masters
  2011-07-31 17:50 · 0 replies this month · Rafael J. Wysocki <hidden>
• STALE5447d [PATCH 5/9] PM / Domains: Add "wait for parent" status for generic PM domains
  2011-07-31 17:49 · 0 replies this month · Rafael J. Wysocki <hidden>
• STALE5447d [PATCH 3/9] PM / Domains: Do not take parent locks to modify subdomain counters
  2011-07-31 17:48 · 0 replies this month · Rafael J. Wysocki <hidden>
• STALE5447d [PATCH 2/9] PM / Domains: Implement subdomain counters as atomic fields
  2011-07-31 17:47 · 0 replies this month · Rafael J. Wysocki <hidden>
• STALE5447d [PATCH 1/9] PM / Domains: Fix pm_genpd_poweron()
  2011-07-31 17:47 · 0 replies this month · Rafael J. Wysocki <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies [PATCH 0/9] PM / Domains: Allow generic PM domains to have multiple parents
  2011-07-31 17:46 · 0 replies this month · Rafael J. Wysocki <hidden>
• STALE5450d Re: [RFC/PATCH v3 00/13] PM QoS: add a per-device latency constraints class
  2011-07-31 17:38 · 0 replies this month · mark gross <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies [git pull] cpupowerutils
  2011-07-31 08:51 · 0 replies this month · Dominik Brodowski <linux@dominikbrodowski.net>
• DORMANTno replies Re: Runtime PM discussion notes
  2011-07-30 22:41 · 0 replies this month · Rafael J. Wysocki <hidden>
• STALE5450d Re: [PATCH 05/13] PM: QoS: support the dynamic insertion and removal of devices
  2011-07-30 22:38 · 0 replies this month · Rafael J. Wysocki <hidden>
• STALE5450d Re: [PATCH 04/13] PM: QoS: implement the per-device latency constraints
  2011-07-30 22:30 · 0 replies this month · Rafael J. Wysocki <hidden>
• STALE5462d Re: Runtime PM discussion notes
  2011-07-30 22:09 · 0 replies this month · Pavel Machek <hidden>
• STALE5462d Re: Runtime PM discussion notes
  2011-07-30 21:36 · 0 replies this month · Rafael J. Wysocki <hidden>
• STALE5447d Re: where is /sys/class/power_supply/ADP1 ?
  2011-07-30 21:28 · 0 replies this month · Rafael J. Wysocki <hidden>
• STALE5462d Re: Runtime PM discussion notes
  2011-07-30 21:25 · 1 reply this month · Rafael J. Wysocki <hidden>
• STALE5444d [PATCH v4 0/3] DEVFREQ, DVFS framework for non-CPU devices
  2011-07-30 21:23 · 9 replies this month · MyungJoo Ham <myungjoo.ham@samsung.com>
• STALE5462d Re: Runtime PM discussion notes
  2011-07-30 21:05 · 0 replies this month · Rafael J. Wysocki <hidden>
• STALE5462d Re: Runtime PM discussion notes
  2011-07-30 20:37 · 0 replies this month · Pavel Machek <hidden>
• STALE5442d [PATCH -next] x86/platform: mrst/pmu.c needs module.h
  2011-07-30 04:14 · 0 replies this month · Randy Dunlap <hidden>
• STALE5450d Re: [PATCH 03/13] PM: QoS: extend the in-kernel API with per-device latency constraints
  2011-07-29 22:55 · 0 replies this month · Rafael J. Wysocki <hidden>
• STALE5450d Re: [PATCH 02/13] PM: add a per-device wake-up latency constraints plist
  2011-07-29 21:58 · 0 replies this month · Rafael J. Wysocki <hidden>
• STALE5450d Re: [PATCH 01/13] PM: QoS: rename pm_qos_params files to pm_qos
  2011-07-29 21:57 · 0 replies this month · Rafael J. Wysocki <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies Re: [linux-pm] better oopsing when frozen
  2011-07-29 21:57 · 0 replies this month · Rafael J. Wysocki <hidden>
• STALE5450d Re: [RFC/PATCH v3 00/13] PM QoS: add a per-device latency constraints class
  2011-07-29 21:46 · 0 replies this month · Rafael J. Wysocki <hidden>
• STALE5450d Re: [RFC/PATCH v3 00/13] PM QoS: add a per-device latency constraints class
  2011-07-29 21:25 · 0 replies this month · Rafael J. Wysocki <hidden>
• STALE5463d Re: [linux-pm] better oopsing when frozen
  2011-07-29 21:23 · 1 reply this month · Rafael J. Wysocki <hidden>
• STALE5463d Re: better oopsing when frozen
  2011-07-29 21:17 · 0 replies this month · Oliver Neukum <oliver@neukum.org>
• STALE5463d Re: better oopsing when frozen
  2011-07-29 21:09 · 0 replies this month · Rafael J. Wysocki <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] Input: enable i8042-level wakeup control
  2011-07-29 21:04 · 0 replies this month · Rafael J. Wysocki <hidden>
• STALE5463d Re: better oopsing when frozen
  2011-07-29 20:29 · 0 replies this month · Rafael J. Wysocki <hidden>
• STALE5463d Re: better oopsing when frozen
  2011-07-29 20:27 · 0 replies this month · Oliver Neukum <oliver@neukum.org>
• STALE5463d Re: better oopsing when frozen
  2011-07-29 19:54 · 0 replies this month · Pavel Machek <hidden>
• STALE5462d Re: Runtime PM discussion notes
  2011-07-29 19:52 · 0 replies this month · Rafael J. Wysocki <hidden>
• STALE5450d Re: [PATCH 08/13] OMAP2+: powerdomain: control power domains next state
  2011-07-29 18:00 · 0 replies this month · Todd Poynor <hidden>
• STALE5460d Re: [RFC v2]: Issues implementing clock handling mechanism within UART driver
  2011-07-29 15:13 · 0 replies this month · Govindraj <hidden>
• STALE5450d Re: [RFC/PATCH v3 00/13] PM QoS: add a per-device latency constraints class
  2011-07-29 14:24 · 0 replies this month · mark gross <hidden>
• STALE5460d Re: [RFC v2]: Issues implementing clock handling mechanism within UART driver
  2011-07-29 14:02 · 0 replies this month · Felipe Balbi <hidden>
• STALE5462d Re: Runtime PM discussion notes
  2011-07-29 13:41 · 0 replies this month · Pavel Machek <hidden>
• STALE5460d Re: [RFC v2]: Issues implementing clock handling mechanism within UART driver
  2011-07-29 12:58 · 0 replies this month · Govindraj <hidden>
• STALE5460d Re: [RFC v2]: Issues implementing clock handling mechanism within UART driver
  2011-07-29 12:19 · 0 replies this month · Felipe Balbi <hidden>
• STALE5460d Re: [RFC v2]: Issues implementing clock handling mechanism within UART driver
  2011-07-29 11:59 · 0 replies this month · Govindraj <hidden>
• STALE5460d Re: [RFC v2]: Issues implementing clock handling mechanism within UART driver
  2011-07-29 11:37 · 0 replies this month · Felipe Balbi <hidden>
• STALE5460d Re: [RFC v2]: Issues implementing clock handling mechanism within UART driver
  2011-07-29 11:24 · 0 replies this month · Govindraj <hidden>
• STALE5460d Re: [RFC v2]: Issues implementing clock handling mechanism within UART driver
  2011-07-29 09:55 · 0 replies this month · Felipe Balbi <hidden>
• STALE5450d Re: [PATCH 07/13] OMAP PM: early init of the pwrdms states
  2011-07-29 08:50 · 0 replies this month · Jean Pihet <hidden>
• STALE5450d Re: [PATCH 08/13] OMAP2+: powerdomain: control power domains next state
  2011-07-29 08:47 · 0 replies this month · Jean Pihet <hidden>
• STALE5450d Re: [RFC/PATCH v3 00/13] PM QoS: add a per-device latency constraints class
  2011-07-29 08:37 · 1 reply this month · mark gross <hidden>
• STALE5450d Re: [PATCH 07/13] OMAP PM: early init of the pwrdms states
  2011-07-29 08:08 · 0 replies this month · Todd Poynor <hidden>
• STALE5450d Re: [PATCH 08/13] OMAP2+: powerdomain: control power domains next state
  2011-07-29 07:59 · 0 replies this month · Todd Poynor <hidden>
• STALE5452d Re: [patch 1/1] [PATCH] include storage keys in hibernation image.
  2011-07-28 22:19 · 0 replies this month · Rafael J. Wysocki <hidden>
• STALE5459d Re: [PATCHv4 04/11] PM: Use *_dec_not_zero instead of *_add_unless
  2011-07-28 22:03 · 0 replies this month · Rafael J. Wysocki <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies Re: [PATCH] Unfreeze tasks after an oops in the freezer
  2011-07-28 21:14 · 0 replies this month · Rafael J. Wysocki <hidden>
• STALE5463d Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] Input: enable i8042-level wakeup control
  2011-07-28 16:01 · 0 replies this month · Daniel Drake <hidden>
• STALE5463d Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] Input: enable i8042-level wakeup control
  2011-07-28 15:45 · 0 replies this month · Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>
• STALE5463d Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] Input: enable i8042-level wakeup control
  2011-07-28 15:21 · 0 replies this month · Daniel Drake <hidden>
• STALE5463d Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] Input: enable i8042-level wakeup control
  2011-07-28 15:08 · 0 replies this month · Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>
• STALE5463d Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] Input: enable i8042-level wakeup control
  2011-07-28 14:59 · 0 replies this month · Daniel Drake <hidden>
• STALE5463d [PATCH v3 1/2] Input: enable i8042-level wakeup control
  2011-07-28 14:53 · 1 reply this month · Daniel Drake <hidden>
• STALE5464d Re: Fw: Panic while enabling 2nd CPU core after suspend to ram on Intel Atom CPU
  2011-07-28 14:40 · 2 replies this month · Rafael J. Wysocki <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies [PATCH v3 2/2] i8042: Enable OLPC's EC-based i8042 wakeup control
  2011-07-28 14:31 · 0 replies this month · Daniel Drake <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies [RFC v2]: Issues implementing clock handling mechanism within UART driver
  2011-07-28 09:29 · 0 replies this month · Govindraj.R <hidden>
• STALE5450d [PATCH 13/13] OMAP2+: cpuidle only influences the MPU state
  2011-07-28 08:30 · 0 replies this month · <hidden>
• STALE5450d [PATCH 12/13] OMAP: PM CONSTRAINTS: implement the devices wake-up latency constraints
  2011-07-28 08:30 · 0 replies this month · <hidden>
• STALE5450d [PATCH 11/13] OMAP2+: omap_hwmod: manage the wake-up latency constraints
  2011-07-28 08:30 · 0 replies this month · <hidden>
• STALE5450d [PATCH 10/13] OMAP4: powerdomain data: add wake-up latency figures
  2011-07-28 08:30 · 0 replies this month · <hidden>
• STALE5450d [PATCH 09/13] OMAP3: powerdomain data: add wake-up latency figures
  2011-07-28 08:30 · 0 replies this month · <hidden>
• STALE5450d [PATCH 08/13] OMAP2+: powerdomain: control power domains next state
  2011-07-28 08:30 · 0 replies this month · <hidden>
• STALE5450d [PATCH 07/13] OMAP PM: early init of the pwrdms states
  2011-07-28 08:30 · 0 replies this month · <hidden>
• STALE5450d [PATCH 06/13] OMAP PM: create a PM layer plugin for per-device constraints
  2011-07-28 08:30 · 0 replies this month · <hidden>
• STALE5450d [PATCH 05/13] PM: QoS: support the dynamic insertion and removal of devices
  2011-07-28 08:30 · 0 replies this month · <hidden>
• STALE5450d [PATCH 04/13] PM: QoS: implement the per-device latency constraints
  2011-07-28 08:30 · 0 replies this month · <hidden>
• STALE5450d [PATCH 03/13] PM: QoS: extend the in-kernel API with per-device latency constraints
  2011-07-28 08:30 · 0 replies this month · <hidden>
• STALE5450d [PATCH 02/13] PM: add a per-device wake-up latency constraints plist
  2011-07-28 08:30 · 0 replies this month · <hidden>
• STALE5450d [PATCH 01/13] PM: QoS: rename pm_qos_params files to pm_qos
  2011-07-28 08:30 · 0 replies this month · <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies [RFC/PATCH v3 00/13] PM QoS: add a per-device latency constraints class
  2011-07-28 08:30 · 0 replies this month · <hidden>
• STALE5459d Re: [PATCHv4 04/11] PM: Use *_dec_not_zero instead of *_add_unless
  2011-07-27 20:36 · 0 replies this month · Pavel Machek <hidden>
• STALE5459d REVIEWED: 1 (0M) Re: [PATCHv4 04/11] PM: Use *_dec_not_zero instead of *_add_unless
  2011-07-27 19:50 · 0 replies this month · Rafael J. Wysocki <hidden>
• STALE5378d Re: PM / hibernate xfs lock up / xfs_reclaim_inodes_ag
  2011-07-27 12:22 · 4 replies this month · Rafael J. Wysocki <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies [PATCH] Unfreeze tasks after an oops in the freezer
  2011-07-27 10:35 · 0 replies this month · Oliver Neukum <hidden>
• STALE5463d Re: better oopsing when frozen
  2011-07-27 10:23 · 0 replies this month · Oliver Neukum <hidden>
• STALE5459d [PATCHv4 04/11] PM: Use *_dec_not_zero instead of *_add_unless
  2011-07-27 09:47 · 0 replies this month · Sven Eckelmann <sven@narfation.org>
• DORMANTno replies Re: [PATCH v2] PM: runtime: add might_sleep to PM runtime functions
  2011-07-27 09:37 · 0 replies this month · Rafael J. Wysocki <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies Re: [RFC/PATCH v2] PM / Runtime: allow _put_sync() from interrupts-disabled context
  2011-07-27 09:22 · 0 replies this month · Rafael J. Wysocki <hidden>
• STALE5463d Re: better oopsing when frozen
  2011-07-27 09:21 · 0 replies this month · Rafael J. Wysocki <hidden>
• STALE5457d Re: [RFC/PATCH v2] PM / Runtime: allow _put_sync() from interrupts-disabled context
  2011-07-27 00:28 · 0 replies this month · Kevin Hilman <hidden>
• STALE5465d REVIEWED: 1 (0M) Re: [PATCH v2] PM: runtime: add might_sleep to PM runtime functions
  2011-07-27 00:26 · 0 replies this month · Kevin Hilman <hidden>
• STALE5465d Re: [PATCH v2] PM: runtime: add might_sleep to PM runtime functions
  2011-07-26 22:55 · 0 replies this month · Colin Cross <hidden>
• STALE5463d Re: better oopsing when frozen
  2011-07-26 22:45 · 0 replies this month · Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
• STALE5463d Re: better oopsing when frozen
  2011-07-26 22:24 · 0 replies this month · Rafael J. Wysocki <hidden>
• STALE5465d Re: [PATCH v2] PM: runtime: add might_sleep to PM runtime functions
  2011-07-26 22:14 · 0 replies this month · Rafael J. Wysocki <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies [PATCH v2] PM: runtime: add might_sleep to PM runtime functions
  2011-07-25 20:55 · 0 replies this month · Colin Cross <hidden>
• STALE5467d Re: suspend/resume problems w/ kernel 3.0 and a *docked* ThinkPad T400
  2011-07-25 18:31 · 2 replies this month · Toralf Förster <hidden>
• STALE5467d Re: suspend/resume problems w/ kernel 3.0 and a *docked* ThinkPad T400
  2011-07-25 14:41 · 0 replies this month · Toralf Förster <hidden>
• STALE5463d Re: better oopsing when frozen
  2011-07-25 10:10 · 0 replies this month · Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
• DORMANTno replies better oopsing when frozen
  2011-07-25 08:43 · 0 replies this month · Oliver Neukum <hidden>
• STALE5467d Re: suspend/resume problems w/ kernel 3.0 and a *docked* ThinkPad T400
  2011-07-24 22:34 · 0 replies this month · Rafael J. Wysocki <hidden>