linux-pm archive · January 2010

334 messages · showing the 100 most-recently-active threads .

• STALE6092d Re: [RFC][RFT][PATCH] ACPI: Protection from suspending in the middle of EC transaction
  2010-01-31 22:31 · 0 replies this month · Rafael J. Wysocki <hidden>
• STALE6092d Re: [RFC][RFT][PATCH] ACPI: Protection from suspending in the middle of EC transaction
  2010-01-31 21:09 · 0 replies this month · Rafael J. Wysocki <hidden>
• STALE6092d Re: [RFC][RFT][PATCH] ACPI: Protection from suspending in the middle of EC transaction
  2010-01-31 20:41 · 0 replies this month · Maxim Levitsky <maximlevitsky@gmail.com>
• STALE6092d Re: [RFC][RFT][PATCH] ACPI: Protection from suspending in the middle of EC transaction
  2010-01-31 17:09 · 0 replies this month · Maxim Levitsky <maximlevitsky@gmail.com>
• STALE6092d Re: [RFC][RFT][PATCH] ACPI: Protection from suspending in the middle of EC transaction
  2010-01-31 14:11 · 0 replies this month · Alan Jenkins <hidden>
• STALE6013d syncing the disks when entering sleep
  2010-01-31 12:33 · 21 replies this month · Leisner, Martin <hidden>
• STALE6093d Re: [PATCH] PM / i915: Skip kernel VT switch during suspend/resume if KMS is used
  2010-01-31 08:54 · 0 replies this month · Pavel Machek <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies [RFC][RFT][PATCH] ACPI: Protection from suspending in the middle of EC transaction
  2010-01-30 23:29 · 0 replies this month · Rafael J. Wysocki <hidden>
• STALE6094d Re: [Update][PATCH] MM / PM: Force GFP_NOIO during suspend/hibernation and resume
  2010-01-30 20:53 · 0 replies this month · Rafael J. Wysocki <hidden>
• STALE6094d Re: [Update][PATCH] MM / PM: Force GFP_NOIO during suspend/hibernation and resume
  2010-01-30 20:42 · 0 replies this month · Maxim Levitsky <maximlevitsky@gmail.com>
• STALE6094d Re: [RFC][PATCH] PM: Force GFP_NOIO during suspend/resume (was: Re: Memory allocations in .suspend became very unreliable)
  2010-01-30 20:37 · 0 replies this month · Maxim Levitsky <maximlevitsky@gmail.com>
• STALE6094d Re: [Update][PATCH] MM / PM: Force GFP_NOIO during suspend/hibernation and resume
  2010-01-30 18:56 · 0 replies this month · Rafael J. Wysocki <hidden>
• STALE6094d Re: [RFC][PATCH] PM: Force GFP_NOIO during suspend/resume (was: Re: Memory allocations in .suspend became very unreliable)
  2010-01-30 18:47 · 0 replies this month · Rafael J. Wysocki <hidden>
• STALE6094d Re: [RFC][PATCH] PM: Force GFP_NOIO during suspend/resume (was: Re: Memory allocations in .suspend became very unreliable)
  2010-01-30 15:46 · 0 replies this month · Maxim Levitsky <maximlevitsky@gmail.com>
• DORMANTno replies Re: [PATCH 1/9] PM: Introduce PM links framework
  2010-01-30 05:11 · 0 replies this month · Mahalingam, Nithish <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies Re: [PATCH 1/2] PM / Runtime: Clean up pm_runtime_disable()
  2010-01-29 20:01 · 0 replies this month · Rafael J. Wysocki <hidden>
• STALE6097d Re: [PATCH 1/2] PM / Runtime: Clean up pm_runtime_disable()
  2010-01-29 19:43 · 0 replies this month · Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>
• STALE6097d Re: [PATCH 1/2] PM / Runtime: Clean up pm_runtime_disable()
  2010-01-29 15:01 · 0 replies this month · Rafael J. Wysocki <hidden>
• STALE6097d Re: [PATCH 1/2] PM / Runtime: Clean up pm_runtime_disable()
  2010-01-29 02:30 · 0 replies this month · Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>
• STALE6098d Re: ACPI Lid Issue
  2010-01-29 00:48 · 0 replies this month · Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>
• STALE6097d Re: [PATCH 1/2] PM / Runtime: Clean up pm_runtime_disable()
  2010-01-28 20:12 · 0 replies this month · Rafael J. Wysocki <hidden>
• STALE6098d ACPI Lid Issue
  2010-01-28 20:11 · 1 reply this month · Robin <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies ACPI Lid Issue
  2010-01-28 16:47 · 0 replies this month · Robin <hidden>
• STALE6097d Re: [PATCH 1/2] PM / Runtime: Clean up pm_runtime_disable()
  2010-01-28 15:37 · 0 replies this month · Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>
• STALE6097d [PATCH 2/2] PM / Runtime: Document power.runtime_auto and related functions
  2010-01-27 23:11 · 0 replies this month · Rafael J. Wysocki <hidden>
• STALE6097d [PATCH 1/2] PM / Runtime: Clean up pm_runtime_disable()
  2010-01-27 23:11 · 0 replies this month · Rafael J. Wysocki <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies [PATCH 0/2] PM / Runtime: Clean-up and documentation
  2010-01-27 23:09 · 0 replies this month · Rafael J. Wysocki <hidden>
• STALE6093d Re: [PATCH] PM / i915: Skip kernel VT switch during suspend/resume if KMS is used
  2010-01-27 23:07 · 0 replies this month · Stefan Seyfried <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies Re: [PATCH 2/2] PM / Hibernate: swap, remove useless check from swsusp_read
  2010-01-27 23:06 · 0 replies this month · Rafael J. Wysocki <hidden>
• STALE6099d Re: [PATCH 1/2] PM: really deprecate deprecated user ioctls
  2010-01-27 23:05 · 0 replies this month · Rafael J. Wysocki <hidden>
• STALE6099d Re: [PATCH 1/2] PM: really deprecate deprecated user ioctls
  2010-01-27 19:48 · 0 replies this month · Pavel Machek <hidden>
• STALE6099d PM-QOS hot path discussion.
  2010-01-27 19:08 · 3 replies this month · 640E9920 <hidden>
• STALE6099d [PATCH 2/2] PM / Hibernate: swap, remove useless check from swsusp_read
  2010-01-27 16:46 · 0 replies this month · Jiri Slaby <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies [PATCH 1/2] PM: really deprecate deprecated user ioctls
  2010-01-27 16:46 · 0 replies this month · Jiri Slaby <hidden>
• STALE6100d Re: [android-porting] wakeup wakelock issues
  2010-01-27 02:21 · 1 reply this month · Aneesh Bhasin <hidden>
• STALE6093d Re: [PATCH] PM / i915: Skip kernel VT switch during suspend/resume if KMS is used
  2010-01-26 22:08 · 1 reply this month · "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
• STALE6093d Re: [PATCH] PM / i915: Skip kernel VT switch during suspend/resume if KMS is used
  2010-01-26 18:47 · 0 replies this month · Rafael J. Wysocki <hidden>
• STALE6093d Re: [PATCH] PM / i915: Skip kernel VT switch during suspend/resume if KMS is used
  2010-01-26 14:58 · 0 replies this month · Pavel Machek <hidden>
• STALE6093d Re: [PATCH] PM / i915: Skip kernel VT switch during suspend/resume if KMS is used
  2010-01-26 14:17 · 0 replies this month · Pavel Machek <hidden>
• STALE6093d Re: [PATCH] PM / i915: Skip kernel VT switch during suspend/resume if KMS is used
  2010-01-25 22:23 · 0 replies this month · Alan Cox <hidden>
• STALE6071d Re: [PATCH 2/8] PM: Asynchronous suspend and resume of devices
  2010-01-25 22:04 · 0 replies this month · Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>
• STALE6093d Re: [PATCH] PM / i915: Skip kernel VT switch during suspend/resume if KMS is used
  2010-01-25 21:54 · 0 replies this month · Rafael J. Wysocki <hidden>
• STALE6094d Re: [Update][PATCH] MM / PM: Force GFP_NOIO during suspend/hibernation and resume
  2010-01-25 21:52 · 0 replies this month · Alexey Starikovskiy <hidden>
• STALE6094d Re: [Update][PATCH] MM / PM: Force GFP_NOIO during suspend/hibernation and resume
  2010-01-25 21:49 · 0 replies this month · Rafael J. Wysocki <hidden>
• STALE6091d Re: [RFC][PATCH] PM: disable nonboot cpus before suspending devices
  2010-01-25 21:37 · 0 replies this month · Rafael J. Wysocki <hidden>
• STALE6093d Re: [PATCH] PM / i915: Skip kernel VT switch during suspend/resume if KMS is used
  2010-01-25 21:27 · 0 replies this month · Alan Cox <hidden>
• STALE6071d Re: [PATCH 2/8] PM: Asynchronous suspend and resume of devices
  2010-01-25 21:26 · 0 replies this month · Rafael J. Wysocki <hidden>
• STALE6093d Re: [PATCH] PM / i915: Skip kernel VT switch during suspend/resume if KMS is used
  2010-01-25 21:17 · 0 replies this month · Rafael J. Wysocki <hidden>
• STALE6093d Re: [PATCH] PM / i915: Skip kernel VT switch during suspend/resume if KMS is used
  2010-01-25 18:49 · 0 replies this month · Jesse Barnes <hidden>
• STALE6093d Re: [PATCH] PM / i915: Skip kernel VT switch during suspend/resume if KMS is used
  2010-01-25 18:43 · 0 replies this month · Alan Cox <hidden>
• STALE6093d Re: [PATCH] PM / i915: Skip kernel VT switch during suspend/resume if KMS is used
  2010-01-25 18:35 · 0 replies this month · Jesse Barnes <hidden>
• STALE6093d REVIEWED: 1 (0M) Re: [PATCH] PM / i915: Skip kernel VT switch during suspend/resume if KMS is used
  2010-01-25 17:22 · 0 replies this month · Eric Anholt <hidden>
• STALE6091d Re: [RFC][PATCH] PM: disable nonboot cpus before suspending devices
  2010-01-25 15:08 · 0 replies this month · Sebastian Ott <hidden>
• STALE6099d Re: Warnings about tasks on CPU 1 during STR
  2010-01-25 13:52 · 1 reply this month · Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
• DORMANTno replies Warnings about tasks on CPU 1 during STR
  2010-01-25 04:42 · 0 replies this month · Frans Pop <hidden>
• STALE6071d Re: [PATCH 2/8] PM: Asynchronous suspend and resume of devices
  2010-01-25 03:12 · 0 replies this month · Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>
• STALE6071d Re: [PATCH 2/8] PM: Asynchronous suspend and resume of devices
  2010-01-24 23:27 · 0 replies this month · Rafael J. Wysocki <hidden>
• STALE6071d Re: [PATCH 2/8] PM: Asynchronous suspend and resume of devices
  2010-01-24 22:30 · 0 replies this month · Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>
• DORMANTno replies 2.6.33-rc5: Reported regressions 2.6.31 -> 2.6.32
  2010-01-24 22:15 · 0 replies this month · Rafael J. Wysocki <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies 2.6.33-rc5: Reported regressions from 2.6.32
  2010-01-24 21:54 · 0 replies this month · Rafael J. Wysocki <hidden>
• STALE6102d Question about behavier of the freezer
  2010-01-24 21:16 · 1 reply this month · Maxim Levitsky <maximlevitsky@gmail.com>
• STALE6071d Re: [PATCH 2/8] PM: Asynchronous suspend and resume of devices
  2010-01-24 20:09 · 0 replies this month · Rafael J. Wysocki <hidden>
• STALE6093d Re: [PATCH] PM / i915: Skip kernel VT switch during suspend/resume if KMS is used
  2010-01-24 19:04 · 0 replies this month · Rafael J. Wysocki <hidden>
• STALE6071d Re: [PATCH 2/8] PM: Asynchronous suspend and resume of devices
  2010-01-24 16:37 · 0 replies this month · Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>
• DORMANTno replies Re: [PATCH 1/2] PM / Runtime: Add sysfs switch for disabling device run-time PM (rev. 2)
  2010-01-24 15:56 · 0 replies this month · Jesse Barnes <hidden>
• STALE6093d Re: [PATCH] PM / i915: Skip kernel VT switch during suspend/resume if KMS is used
  2010-01-24 00:18 · 0 replies this month · Alan Cox <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies [PATCH] PM / i915: Skip kernel VT switch during suspend/resume if KMS is used
  2010-01-23 23:55 · 0 replies this month · Rafael J. Wysocki <hidden>
• STALE6071d [PATCH 1/8] PM: Add parent information to timing messages
  2010-01-23 23:42 · 0 replies this month · Rafael J. Wysocki <hidden>
• STALE6071d [PATCH 8/8] PM: Allow SCSI devices to suspend/resume asynchronously
  2010-01-23 23:41 · 0 replies this month · Rafael J. Wysocki <hidden>
• STALE6071d [PATCH 7/8] PM: Allow USB devices to suspend/resume asynchronously
  2010-01-23 23:40 · 0 replies this month · Rafael J. Wysocki <hidden>
• STALE6071d [PATCH 6/8] PM: Allow PCI devices to suspend/resume asynchronously
  2010-01-23 23:39 · 0 replies this month · Rafael J. Wysocki <hidden>
• STALE6071d [PATCH 5/8] PM: Start asynchronous resume threads upfront
  2010-01-23 23:38 · 0 replies this month · Rafael J. Wysocki <hidden>
• STALE6071d [PATCH 4/8] PM: Add facility for advanced testing of async suspend/resume
  2010-01-23 23:38 · 0 replies this month · Rafael J. Wysocki <hidden>
• STALE6071d [PATCH 3/8] PM: Add a switch for disabling/enabling asynchronous suspend/resume
  2010-01-23 23:36 · 0 replies this month · Rafael J. Wysocki <hidden>
• STALE6071d [PATCH 2/8] PM: Asynchronous suspend and resume of devices
  2010-01-23 23:35 · 0 replies this month · Rafael J. Wysocki <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies [PATCH 0/8] PM: Asynchronous suspen and resume
  2010-01-23 23:33 · 0 replies this month · Rafael J. Wysocki <hidden>
• STALE6091d Re: [PATCH 1/2] PM / Runtime: Add sysfs switch for disabling device run-time PM (rev. 2)
  2010-01-23 20:08 · 0 replies this month · Rafael J. Wysocki <hidden>
• STALE6091d REVIEWED: 5 (5M) Re: [PATCH 1/2] PM / Runtime: Add sysfs switch for disabling device run-time PM (rev. 2)
  2010-01-23 15:20 · 0 replies this month · Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>
• STALE6091d Re: [PATCH 1/2] PM / Runtime: Add sysfs switch for disabling device run-time PM (rev. 2)
  2010-01-23 12:14 · 0 replies this month · Rafael J. Wysocki <hidden>
• STALE6094d Re: [Update][PATCH] MM / PM: Force GFP_NOIO during suspend/hibernation and resume
  2010-01-23 09:29 · 0 replies this month · Maxim Levitsky <maximlevitsky@gmail.com>
• DORMANTno replies turbostat.c (version Jan-23, 2010)
  2010-01-23 07:01 · 0 replies this month · Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>
• STALE6091d Re: [PATCH 1/2] PM / Runtime: Add sysfs switch for disabling device run-time PM (rev. 2)
  2010-01-23 03:22 · 0 replies this month · Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>
• STALE6091d Re: [PATCH 1/2] PM / Runtime: Add sysfs switch for disabling device run-time PM (rev. 2)
  2010-01-22 22:55 · 0 replies this month · Rafael J. Wysocki <hidden>
• STALE6091d Re: [PATCH 1/2] PM / Runtime: Add sysfs switch for disabling device run-time PM (rev. 2)
  2010-01-22 22:45 · 0 replies this month · Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>
• STALE6091d Re: [RFC][PATCH] PM: disable nonboot cpus before suspending devices
  2010-01-22 21:24 · 0 replies this month · Rafael J. Wysocki <hidden>
• STALE6091d Re: [RFC][PATCH] PM: disable nonboot cpus before suspending devices
  2010-01-22 21:24 · 0 replies this month · Rafael J. Wysocki <hidden>
• STALE6091d Re: [RFC][PATCH] PM: disable nonboot cpus before suspending devices
  2010-01-22 21:24 · 0 replies this month · Rafael J. Wysocki <hidden>
• STALE6094d [Update][PATCH] MM / PM: Force GFP_NOIO during suspend/hibernation and resume
  2010-01-22 21:19 · 0 replies this month · Rafael J. Wysocki <hidden>
• STALE6094d Re: [RFC][PATCH] PM: Force GFP_NOIO during suspend/resume (was: Re: Memory allocations in .suspend became very unreliable)
  2010-01-22 20:58 · 0 replies this month · Rafael J. Wysocki <hidden>
• STALE6091d Re: [PATCH 1/2] PM / Runtime: Add sysfs switch for disabling device run-time PM (rev. 2)
  2010-01-22 20:56 · 0 replies this month · Rafael J. Wysocki <hidden>
• STALE6091d Re: [RFC][PATCH] PM: disable nonboot cpus before suspending devices
  2010-01-22 20:48 · 0 replies this month · Rafael J. Wysocki <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies [RFC][PATCH] PM: disable nonboot cpus before suspending devices
  2010-01-22 18:00 · 0 replies this month · Sebastian Ott <hidden>
• STALE6094d Re: [RFC][PATCH] PM: Force GFP_NOIO during suspend/resume (was: Re: Memory allocations in .suspend became very unreliable)
  2010-01-22 10:11 · 0 replies this month · Maxim Levitsky <maximlevitsky@gmail.com>
• STALE6091d Re: [PATCH 1/2] PM / Runtime: Add sysfs switch for disabling device run-time PM (rev. 2)
  2010-01-22 03:02 · 0 replies this month · Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>
• STALE6094d Re: [RFC][PATCH] PM: Force GFP_NOIO during suspend/resume (was: Re: Memory allocations in .suspend became very unreliable)
  2010-01-22 01:42 · 0 replies this month · KOSAKI Motohiro <hidden>
• STALE6094d Re: [RFC][PATCH] PM: Force GFP_NOIO during suspend/resume (was: Re: Memory allocations in .suspend became very unreliable)
  2010-01-22 01:31 · 0 replies this month · KOSAKI Motohiro <hidden>
• STALE6091d [PATCH 2/2] PM: Document device power attributes in sysfs
  2010-01-21 23:00 · 0 replies this month · Rafael J. Wysocki <hidden>
• STALE6091d [PATCH 1/2] PM / Runtime: Add sysfs switch for disabling device run-time PM (rev. 2)
  2010-01-21 22:59 · 0 replies this month · Rafael J. Wysocki <hidden>
• STALE6091d [PATCH 0/2] sysfs switch for disabling device run-time PM
  2010-01-21 22:57 · 0 replies this month · Rafael J. Wysocki <hidden>
• STALE6094d Re:[RFC][PATCH] PM: Force GFP_NOIO during suspend/resume (was: Re: Memory allocations in .suspend became very unreliable)
  2010-01-21 21:38 · 0 replies this month · Rafael J. Wysocki <hidden>