linux-pm archive · July 2009

237 messages · showing the 100 most-recently-active threads .

• DORMANTno replies Re: [PATCH 04/04] video: Runtime PM hack for SuperH LCDC driver
  2009-07-31 18:56 · 0 replies this month · Rafael J. Wysocki <hidden>
• STALE6191d Re: [PATCH update] PM: Introduce core framework for run-time PM of I/O devices (rev. 11)
  2009-07-31 18:53 · 0 replies this month · Rafael J. Wysocki <hidden>
• STALE6191d Re: [PATCH update] PM: Introduce core framework for run-time PM of I/O devices (rev. 11)
  2009-07-31 14:32 · 0 replies this month · Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@gmail.com>
• DORMANTno replies [PATCH 04/04] video: Runtime PM hack for SuperH LCDC driver
  2009-07-31 14:02 · 0 replies this month · Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@gmail.com>
• STALE6194d [PATCH 03/04] uio: Runtime PM changes for UIO driver
  2009-07-31 14:02 · 0 replies this month · Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@gmail.com>
• STALE6194d [PATCH 02/04] i2c: Runtime PM changes for SuperH I2C driver
  2009-07-31 14:02 · 0 replies this month · Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@gmail.com>
• STALE6194d [PATCH 01/04] sh: SuperH platform bus code for Runtime PM v11
  2009-07-31 14:02 · 0 replies this month · Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@gmail.com>
• DORMANTno replies [PATCH 00/04] PM: SuperH Runtime PM prototype V2
  2009-07-31 14:01 · 0 replies this month · Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@gmail.com>
• DORMANTno replies [PATCH] Driver Core: Runtime PM callbacks for the Platform Bus V2
  2009-07-31 12:46 · 0 replies this month · Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@gmail.com>
• STALE6194d [PATCH 00/04] PM: Runtime PM v11 patches 20090731
  2009-07-31 12:27 · 4 replies this month · Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@gmail.com>
• STALE6114d Montreal Linux Power Management Mini-Summit -- July 13, 2009
  2009-07-30 22:05 · 2 replies this month · Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>
• STALE6195d Re: [Bug 13865] [PATCH] hp-wmi: check that an input device exists in resume handler
  2009-07-30 21:17 · 0 replies this month · Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>
• STALE6195d intermittent suspend problem
  2009-07-30 20:38 · 1 reply this month · Ferenc Wagner <hidden>
• STALE6195d REVIEWED: 1 (0M) Re: [Bug 13865] [PATCH] hp-wmi: check that an input device exists in resume handler
  2009-07-30 12:37 · 0 replies this month · Matthew Garrett <hidden>
• STALE6195d Re: [Bug 13865] [PATCH] hp-wmi: check that an input device exists in resume handler
  2009-07-30 10:42 · 0 replies this month · Frans Pop <hidden>
• STALE6195d Re: [Bug 13865] Can only resume with HP_WMI selected on compaq nc6000 when 4c395bdd3f2ca8f7e8efad881e16071182c3b8ca is reverted
  2009-07-30 09:56 · 0 replies this month · Frans Pop <hidden>
• STALE6195d Re: [Bug 13865] Can only resume with HP_WMI selected on compaq nc6000 when 4c395bdd3f2ca8f7e8efad881e16071182c3b8ca is reverted
  2009-07-30 09:20 · 0 replies this month · Cédric Godin <hidden>
• STALE6195d Re: [Bug 13865] Can only resume with HP_WMI selected on compaq nc6000 when 4c395bdd3f2ca8f7e8efad881e16071182c3b8ca is reverted
  2009-07-29 22:57 · 0 replies this month · Frans Pop <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies [GIT PULL] PM fixes for 2.6.31
  2009-07-29 22:06 · 0 replies this month · Rafael J. Wysocki <hidden>
• STALE6195d [Bug 13865] Can only resume with HP_WMI selected on compaq nc6000 when 4c395bdd3f2ca8f7e8efad881e16071182c3b8ca is reverted
  2009-07-29 21:31 · 0 replies this month · Frans Pop <hidden>
• STALE6196d [PATH] i915: Read outside array bounds
  2009-07-29 21:06 · 2 replies this month · Roel Kluin <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies Re: [Bug 13865] New: Can only resume with HP_WMI selected on compaq nc6000 when 4c395bdd3f2ca8f7e8efad881e16071182c3b8ca is reverted
  2009-07-29 20:57 · 0 replies this month · Rafael J. Wysocki <hidden>
• STALE6196d x86: Expected system state when resumed
  2009-07-29 15:08 · 5 replies this month · Deepak Saxena <dsaxena@plexity.net>
• DORMANTno replies Converting to dev_pm_ops (remove annoying warnings)
  2009-07-28 10:44 · 0 replies this month · Ben Dooks <ben-linux@fluff.org>
• STALE6198d Re: PM/hibernate swapfile regression
  2009-07-27 05:12 · 0 replies this month · Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
• DORMANTno replies 2.6.31-rc4: Reported regressions 2.6.29 -> 2.6.30
  2009-07-26 20:41 · 0 replies this month · Rafael J. Wysocki <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies 2.6.31-rc4: Reported regressions from 2.6.30
  2009-07-26 20:23 · 0 replies this month · Rafael J. Wysocki <hidden>
• STALE6199d Re: suspend to disk now broken
  2009-07-26 05:24 · 0 replies this month · Celejar <hidden>
• STALE6199d Re: suspend to disk now broken
  2009-07-25 22:18 · 0 replies this month · Rafael J. Wysocki <hidden>
• STALE6198d Re: PM/hibernate swapfile regression
  2009-07-25 21:58 · 0 replies this month · Rafael J. Wysocki <hidden>
• STALE6194d Re: [PATCH 1/1] acer-wmi: switch driver to dev_pm_ops
  2009-07-25 20:04 · 0 replies this month · Rafael J. Wysocki <hidden>
• STALE6201d Re: [PATCH] cpuidle: menu governor: reduce latency on exit
  2009-07-24 15:41 · 0 replies this month · Corrado Zoccolo <hidden>
• STALE6201d [RFC Add no_suspend attribute V2] Let the driver know if it's in use
  2009-07-24 15:36 · 5 replies this month · Michael Trimarchi <hidden>
• STALE5987d Re: Generic events for wake up from S1-S4
  2009-07-24 14:49 · 0 replies this month · Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
• STALE5987d Re: Generic events for wake up from S1-S4
  2009-07-24 13:39 · 0 replies this month · Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <hmh@hmh.eng.br>
• STALE6190d [PATCH V2 4/4] i8042: support async suspend and shutdown
  2009-07-24 07:14 · 1 reply this month · Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>
• STALE6201d [PATCH V2 1/4] fix a problem that linux/async.h can not be included in another header file
  2009-07-24 07:12 · 1 reply this month · Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>
• DORMANTno replies [PATCH V2 0/4] introduce device async actions mechanism
  2009-07-24 03:01 · 0 replies this month · Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>
• DORMANTno replies [PATCH V2 3/4] ACPI battery: support async resume
  2009-07-24 03:01 · 0 replies this month · Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>
• STALE6190d [PATCH V2 2/4] introduce the device async action mechanism
  2009-07-24 03:01 · 0 replies this month · Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>
• STALE5987d Re: Generic events for wake up from S1-S4
  2009-07-24 00:53 · 0 replies this month · ykzhao <hidden>
• STALE6201d Re: [PATCH] cpuidle: menu governor: reduce latency on exit
  2009-07-23 22:05 · 0 replies this month · Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
• STALE5987d Re: Generic events for wake up from S1-S4
  2009-07-23 21:27 · 0 replies this month · Rafael J. Wysocki <hidden>
• STALE6191d [PATCH update] PM: Introduce core framework for run-time PM of I/O devices (rev. 11)
  2009-07-22 19:10 · 0 replies this month · Rafael J. Wysocki <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies Re: [PATCH] NET / skge: Enable WoL by default if supported
  2009-07-22 18:25 · 0 replies this month · David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
• STALE6203d REVIEWED: 1 (0M) [PATCH] NET / skge: Enable WoL by default if supported
  2009-07-22 16:59 · 1 reply this month · Rafael J. Wysocki <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies [PATCH] PM: Introduce core framework for run-time PM of I/O devices (rev. 10)
  2009-07-22 15:01 · 0 replies this month · Rafael J. Wysocki <hidden>
• STALE6190d [RFC v17][PATCH 05/60] cgroup freezer: Fix buggy resume test for tasks frozen with cgroup freezer
  2009-07-22 09:59 · 0 replies this month · Oren Laadan <hidden>
• STALE6203d Re: [PATCH] [suspend] pci_raw_set_power_state: replace msleep by udelay in resuming procedure
  2009-07-22 07:10 · 0 replies this month · Pavel Machek <hidden>
• STALE6203d Re: [PATCH] [suspend] pci_raw_set_power_state: replace msleep by udelay in resuming procedure
  2009-07-22 02:23 · 0 replies this month · Wu Zhangjin <hidden>
• STALE6198d Re: PM/hibernate swapfile regression
  2009-07-21 21:55 · 0 replies this month · Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
• STALE6198d Re: PM/hibernate swapfile regression
  2009-07-21 21:46 · 0 replies this month · Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
• STALE6198d Re: PM/hibernate swapfile regression
  2009-07-21 20:57 · 0 replies this month · Rafael J. Wysocki <hidden>
• STALE6204d Re: [PATCH] Driver core: make pm operations a const pointer
  2009-07-21 16:42 · 0 replies this month · Greg KH <gregkh@suse.de>
• STALE6204d Re: [PATCH] Driver core: make pm operations a const pointer
  2009-07-21 15:45 · 0 replies this month · Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
• DORMANTno replies [PATCH] mips: decrease size of au1xxx_dbdma_pm_regs[][]
  2009-07-21 14:19 · 0 replies this month · Roel Kluin <hidden>
• STALE6204d Re: [PATCH] Driver core: make pm operations a const pointer
  2009-07-21 13:46 · 0 replies this month · Rafael J. Wysocki <hidden>
• STALE6198d Re: PM/hibernate swapfile regression
  2009-07-21 13:41 · 0 replies this month · Rafael J. Wysocki <hidden>
• STALE6204d Re: [PATCH] mips: decrease size of au1xxx_dbdma_pm_regs[][]
  2009-07-21 13:06 · 0 replies this month · Manuel Lauss <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies [PATCH] mips: decrease size of au1xxx_dbdma_pm_regs[][]
  2009-07-21 12:46 · 0 replies this month · Roel Kluin <hidden>
• STALE6198d Re: PM/hibernate swapfile regression
  2009-07-21 10:50 · 0 replies this month · Alan Jenkins <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies Re: [PATCH 2/8] introduce the device async action mechanism
  2009-07-20 16:24 · 0 replies this month · Rafael J. Wysocki <hidden>
• STALE6196d Re: [PATCH] hibernate / memory hotplug: always use for_each_populated_zone()
  2009-07-20 16:04 · 0 replies this month · Rafael J. Wysocki <hidden>
• STALE6198d Re: PM/hibernate swapfile regression
  2009-07-20 13:24 · 0 replies this month · Heiko Carstens <hidden>
• STALE6205d Re: [PATCH 2/8] introduce the device async action mechanism
  2009-07-20 03:09 · 0 replies this month · Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>
• STALE6205d Re: [PATCH 2/8] introduce the device async action mechanism
  2009-07-19 22:16 · 0 replies this month · Pavel Machek <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies [PATCH] cpuidle: menu governor: reduce latency on exit
  2009-07-19 14:59 · 0 replies this month · Corrado Zoccolo <hidden>
• STALE6206d Re: [patch 2/2] sched: fix nr_uninterruptible accounting of frozen tasks really
  2009-07-18 23:59 · 0 replies this month · Nathan Lynch <hidden>
• STALE6206d Re: [patch 2/2] sched: fix nr_uninterruptible accounting of frozen tasks really
  2009-07-18 12:56 · 0 replies this month · Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
• DORMANTno replies Re: [PATCH 00/04][RFC] PM: Runtime platform device PM
  2009-07-18 11:49 · 0 replies this month · Pavel Machek <hidden>
• STALE6206d Re: [patch 2/2] sched: fix nr_uninterruptible accounting of frozen tasks really
  2009-07-17 22:26 · 0 replies this month · Nigel Cunningham <hidden>
• STALE6206d Re: [patch 2/2] sched: fix nr_uninterruptible accounting of frozen tasks really
  2009-07-17 20:55 · 0 replies this month · Nathan Lynch <hidden>
• STALE6206d [patch 2/2] sched: fix nr_uninterruptible accounting of frozen tasks really
  2009-07-17 20:54 · 3 replies this month · Thomas Gleixner <hidden>
• STALE6206d Re: [patch 2/2] sched: fix nr_uninterruptible accounting of frozen tasks really
  2009-07-17 16:47 · 0 replies this month · Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
• STALE6206d Re: [patch 2/2] sched: fix nr_uninterruptible accounting of frozen tasks really
  2009-07-17 16:20 · 0 replies this month · Matt Helsley <hidden>
• STALE6206d Re: [patch 2/2] sched: fix nr_uninterruptible accounting of frozen tasks really
  2009-07-17 15:55 · 0 replies this month · Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
• STALE6206d Re: [patch 2/2] sched: fix nr_uninterruptible accounting of frozen tasks really
  2009-07-17 15:22 · 0 replies this month · Matt Helsley <hidden>
• STALE6198d Re: PM/hibernate swapfile regression
  2009-07-17 13:08 · 2 replies this month · Rafael J. Wysocki <hidden>
• STALE6206d Re: [patch 2/2] sched: fix nr_uninterruptible accounting of frozen tasks really
  2009-07-17 12:48 · 0 replies this month · Thomas Gleixner <hidden>
• STALE6205d Re: [PATCH 2/8] introduce the device async action mechanism
  2009-07-17 04:31 · 0 replies this month · Arjan van de Ven <hidden>
• STALE6203d Re: [PATCH] [suspend] pci_raw_set_power_state: replace msleep by udelay in resuming procedure
  2009-07-17 03:38 · 0 replies this month · Wu Zhangjin <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies Re: [PATCH 8/8] i8042: support device async suspend & shutdown
  2009-07-17 03:08 · 0 replies this month · Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>
• STALE6205d Re: [PATCH 2/8] introduce the device async action mechanism
  2009-07-17 02:44 · 0 replies this month · Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>
• STALE6208d Re: [PATCH 8/8] i8042: support device async suspend & shutdown
  2009-07-17 02:40 · 1 reply this month · Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>
• STALE6203d Re: [PATCH] [suspend] pci_raw_set_power_state: replace msleep by udelay in resuming procedure
  2009-07-17 02:33 · 0 replies this month · Rafael J. Wysocki <hidden>
• STALE6203d Re: [PATCH] [suspend] pci_raw_set_power_state: replace msleep by udelay in resuming procedure
  2009-07-17 02:18 · 0 replies this month · Wu Zhangjin <hidden>
• STALE6203d Re: [PATCH] [suspend] pci_raw_set_power_state: replace msleep by udelay in resuming procedure
  2009-07-17 02:10 · 0 replies this month · Wu Zhangjin <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies Re: [PATCH 0/8] device async action mechanism
  2009-07-17 01:40 · 0 replies this month · Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>
• DORMANTno replies Re: [PATCH 0/8] device async action mechanism
  2009-07-17 01:37 · 0 replies this month · Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>
• STALE6205d Re: [PATCH 2/8] introduce the device async action mechanism
  2009-07-17 01:11 · 0 replies this month · Rafael J. Wysocki <hidden>
• STALE6203d Re: [PATCH] [suspend] pci_raw_set_power_state: replace msleep by udelay in resuming procedure
  2009-07-16 17:02 · 0 replies this month · Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>
• DORMANTno replies [PATCH] [suspend] pci_raw_set_power_state: replace msleep by udelay in resuming procedure
  2009-07-16 15:43 · 0 replies this month · Wu Zhangjin <hidden>
• STALE6208d Re: [PATCH 0/8] device async action mechanism
  2009-07-16 14:36 · 0 replies this month · Fabio Comolli <hidden>
• STALE6208d Re: [PATCH 0/8] device async action mechanism
  2009-07-16 13:45 · 0 replies this month · Arjan van de Ven <hidden>
• STALE6208d Re: [PATCH 0/8] device async action mechanism
  2009-07-16 11:40 · 0 replies this month · Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <hmh@hmh.eng.br>
• STALE6208d Re: [PATCH 0/8] device async action mechanism
  2009-07-16 08:30 · 0 replies this month · Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>
• STALE6208d Re: [PATCH 0/8] device async action mechanism
  2009-07-16 08:07 · 0 replies this month · Andi Kleen <hidden>
• STALE6209d Re: 2.6.31-rc2+: Interrupts enabled after cpufreq_suspend
  2009-07-16 03:10 · 0 replies this month · Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
• STALE6205d Re: [PATCH 2/8] introduce the device async action mechanism
  2009-07-16 02:05 · 0 replies this month · Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>
• DORMANTno replies Re: [PATCH 8/8] i8042: support device async suspend & shutdown
  2009-07-16 01:45 · 0 replies this month · Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>