linux-pm archive · December 2007

326 messages · showing the 100 most-recently-active threads .

• DORMANTno replies IDE/ACPI related hibernation regression: Second attempt fails
  2007-12-31 21:27 · 0 replies this month · Mikko Vinni <hidden>
• STALE6831d Re: [PATCH 0/3 -mm] kexec jump -v8
  2007-12-31 19:26 · 0 replies this month · Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>
• DORMANTno replies [PATCH] Warn about attempts to register/unregister devices during system suspend
  2007-12-31 18:40 · 0 replies this month · Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>
• DORMANTno replies Re: [PATCH] Hibernation: Document __save_processor_state() on x86-64
  2007-12-31 17:57 · 0 replies this month · Rafael J. Wysocki <hidden>
• STALE6829d [RFC] sleepy linux
  2007-12-31 13:47 · 21 replies this month · Pavel Machek <hidden>
• STALE6837d Re: [PATCH] Hibernation: Document __save_processor_state() on x86-64
  2007-12-31 10:43 · 0 replies this month · Ingo Molnar <hidden>
• STALE6837d Re: [PATCH] Hibernation: Document __save_processor_state() on x86-64
  2007-12-31 09:29 · 2 replies this month · Ingo Molnar <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies [PATCH] Hibernation: Document __save_processor_state() on x86-64 (rev. 2)
  2007-12-30 22:13 · 0 replies this month · Rafael J. Wysocki <hidden>
• STALE6837d Re: [PATCH] Hibernation: Document __save_processor_state() on x86-64
  2007-12-30 22:08 · 0 replies this month · Rafael J. Wysocki <hidden>
• STALE6837d Re: [PATCH] Hibernation: Document __save_processor_state() on x86-64
  2007-12-30 21:48 · 0 replies this month · Rafael J. Wysocki <hidden>
• STALE6837d Re: [PATCH] Hibernation: Document __save_processor_state() on x86-64
  2007-12-30 21:31 · 0 replies this month · Ingo Molnar <hidden>
• STALE6837d Re: [PATCH] Hibernation: Document __save_processor_state() on x86-64
  2007-12-30 21:04 · 0 replies this month · Rafael J. Wysocki <hidden>
• STALE6837d Re: [PATCH] Hibernation: Document __save_processor_state() on x86-64
  2007-12-30 20:51 · 0 replies this month · Ingo Molnar <hidden>
• STALE6837d Re: [PATCH] Hibernation: Document __save_processor_state() on x86-64
  2007-12-30 20:17 · 0 replies this month · Pavel Machek <hidden>
• STALE6837d [PATCH] Hibernation: Document __save_processor_state() on x86-64
  2007-12-30 14:21 · 2 replies this month · Rafael J. Wysocki <hidden>
• STALE6837d Re: [PATCH] Hibernation: Document __save_processor_state() on x86-64
  2007-12-30 13:30 · 0 replies this month · Rafael J. Wysocki <hidden>
• STALE6831d Re: [PATCH 0/3 -mm] kexec jump -v8
  2007-12-29 02:00 · 0 replies this month · Huang, Ying <hidden>
• STALE6831d Re: [PATCH 0/3 -mm] kexec jump -v8
  2007-12-28 21:33 · 0 replies this month · Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>
• STALE6831d Re: [PATCH 0/3 -mm] kexec jump -v8
  2007-12-28 07:30 · 0 replies this month · Huang, Ying <hidden>
• STALE6830d Re: Suspend code ordering (again)
  2007-12-28 05:44 · 0 replies this month · Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
• STALE6830d Re: Suspend code ordering (again)
  2007-12-28 00:25 · 0 replies this month · Robert Hancock <hidden>
• STALE6835d Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/7] Fix the ACPI 1.0 vs ACPI 2.0 suspend ordering issue
  2007-12-27 22:40 · 0 replies this month · Rafael J. Wysocki <hidden>
• STALE6830d Re: Suspend code ordering (again)
  2007-12-27 20:00 · 0 replies this month · Rafael J. Wysocki <hidden>
• STALE6835d [RFC][PATCH 1/7] Suspend: Introduce open() and close() callbacks
  2007-12-27 18:13 · 0 replies this month · Rafael J. Wysocki <hidden>
• STALE6831d Re: [PATCH 0/3 -mm] kexec jump -v8
  2007-12-27 18:12 · 0 replies this month · Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>
• STALE6835d REVIEWED: 1 (0M) Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/7] Fix the ACPI 1.0 vs ACPI 2.0 suspend ordering issue
  2007-12-27 18:08 · 0 replies this month · Carlos Corbacho <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies Re: Suspend code ordering (again)
  2007-12-27 18:07 · 0 replies this month · Robert Hancock <hidden>
• STALE6835d [RFC][PATCH 6/7] Hibernation: Call _PTS early on ACPI 1.0x systems
  2007-12-27 18:04 · 0 replies this month · Rafael J. Wysocki <hidden>
• STALE6835d [RFC][PATCH 7/7] ACPI: Print message before calling _PTS
  2007-12-27 18:03 · 0 replies this month · Rafael J. Wysocki <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies [RFC][PATCH 0/7] Fix the ACPI 1.0 vs ACPI 2.0 suspend ordering issue
  2007-12-27 18:03 · 0 replies this month · Rafael J. Wysocki <hidden>
• STALE6835d [RFC][PATCH 4/7] Suspend: Call _PTS early on ACPI 1.0x systems
  2007-12-27 18:03 · 0 replies this month · Rafael J. Wysocki <hidden>
• STALE6835d [RFC][PATCH 5/7] Hibernation: Introduce open() and close() callbacks
  2007-12-27 18:03 · 0 replies this month · Rafael J. Wysocki <hidden>
• STALE6835d [RFC][PATCH 3/7] ACPI: Separate disabling of GPEs from _PTS
  2007-12-27 18:02 · 0 replies this month · Rafael J. Wysocki <hidden>
• STALE6835d [RFC][PATCH 2/7] ACPI: Separate invocations of _GTS and _BFS from _PTS and _WAK
  2007-12-27 18:02 · 0 replies this month · Rafael J. Wysocki <hidden>
• STALE6831d Re: [PATCH 0/3 -mm] kexec jump -v8
  2007-12-27 02:33 · 0 replies this month · Huang, Ying <hidden>
• STALE6831d Re: [PATCH 0/3 -mm] kexec jump -v8
  2007-12-27 01:57 · 0 replies this month · Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>
• STALE6842d Re: Suspend code ordering (again)
  2007-12-26 17:50 · 0 replies this month · "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@kernel.org>
• STALE6842d Re: Suspend code ordering (again)
  2007-12-26 15:24 · 0 replies this month · Alexey Starikovskiy <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies Re: [PATCH 0/3] PM: Do not destroy/create devices while suspended
  2007-12-26 15:12 · 0 replies this month · Rafael J. Wysocki <hidden>
• STALE6842d Re: Suspend code ordering (again) (was: Re: x86: Increase PCIBIOS_MIN_IO to 0x1500 to fix nForce 4 suspend-to-RAM)
  2007-12-26 15:07 · 1 reply this month · Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
• STALE6843d Re: x86: Increase PCIBIOS_MIN_IO to 0x1500 to fix nForce 4 suspend-to-RAM
  2007-12-26 07:23 · 2 replies this month · Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
• STALE6843d Re: [PATCH 0/3] PM: Do not destroy/create devices while suspended
  2007-12-26 03:33 · 1 reply this month · Rafael J. Wysocki <hidden>
• STALE6843d Re: x86: Increase PCIBIOS_MIN_IO to 0x1500 to fix nForce 4 suspend-to-RAM
  2007-12-25 18:26 · 0 replies this month · Rafael J. Wysocki <hidden>
• STALE6843d Re: x86: Increase PCIBIOS_MIN_IO to 0x1500 to fix nForce 4 suspend-to-RAM
  2007-12-25 17:17 · 0 replies this month · Robert Hancock <hidden>
• STALE6843d Re: [PATCH 0/3] PM: Do not destroy/create devices while suspended
  2007-12-25 16:21 · 0 replies this month · Rafael J. Wysocki <hidden>
• STALE6842d Re: x86: Increase PCIBIOS_MIN_IO to 0x1500 to fix nForce 4 suspend-to-RAM
  2007-12-25 16:13 · 3 replies this month · Rafael J. Wysocki <hidden>
• STALE6843d Re: x86: Increase PCIBIOS_MIN_IO to 0x1500 to fix nForce 4 suspend-to-RAM
  2007-12-25 14:11 · 0 replies this month · Rafael J. Wysocki <hidden>
• STALE6843d Re: ACPI: _PTS ordering needs fixing for pre ACPI 3.0 systems (was: Re: x86: Increase PCIBIOS_MIN_IO to 0x1500 to fix nForce 4 suspend-to-RAM)
  2007-12-25 14:07 · 0 replies this month · Rafael J. Wysocki <hidden>
• STALE6843d Re: ACPI: _PTS ordering needs fixing for pre ACPI 3.0 systems (was: Re: x86: Increase PCIBIOS_MIN_IO to 0x1500 to fix nForce 4 suspend-to-RAM)
  2007-12-25 13:52 · 0 replies this month · Carlos Corbacho <hidden>
• STALE6843d Re: ACPI: _PTS ordering needs fixing for pre ACPI 3.0 systems (was: Re: x86: Increase PCIBIOS_MIN_IO to 0x1500 to fix nForce 4 suspend-to-RAM)
  2007-12-25 13:36 · 0 replies this month · Rafael J. Wysocki <hidden>
• STALE6843d Re: x86: Increase PCIBIOS_MIN_IO to 0x1500 to fix nForce 4 suspend-to-RAM
  2007-12-25 13:26 · 0 replies this month · Rafael J. Wysocki <hidden>
• STALE6843d Re: x86: Increase PCIBIOS_MIN_IO to 0x1500 to fix nForce 4 suspend-to-RAM
  2007-12-25 13:12 · 0 replies this month · Carlos Corbacho <hidden>
• STALE6843d Re: [PATCH 3/3] PM: Do not destroy/create devices while suspended in cpuid.c
  2007-12-25 12:34 · 0 replies this month · Pavel Machek <hidden>
• STALE6843d Re: [PATCH 2/3] PM: Do not destroy/create devices while suspended in mce_64.c
  2007-12-25 12:34 · 0 replies this month · Pavel Machek <hidden>
• STALE6843d Re: [PATCH 1/3] PM: Do not destroy/create devices while suspended in msr.c
  2007-12-25 12:33 · 0 replies this month · Pavel Machek <hidden>
• STALE6843d Re: [PATCH 0/3] PM: Do not destroy/create devices while suspended
  2007-12-25 12:33 · 0 replies this month · Pavel Machek <hidden>
• STALE6843d ACPI: _PTS ordering needs fixing for pre ACPI 3.0 systems (was: Re: x86: Increase PCIBIOS_MIN_IO to 0x1500 to fix nForce 4 suspend-to-RAM)
  2007-12-25 02:41 · 0 replies this month · Carlos Corbacho <hidden>
• STALE6843d Re: x86: Increase PCIBIOS_MIN_IO to 0x1500 to fix nForce 4 suspend-to-RAM
  2007-12-25 00:03 · 0 replies this month · Carlos Corbacho <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies Re: x86: Increase PCIBIOS_MIN_IO to 0x1500 to fix nForce 4 suspend-to-RAM
  2007-12-24 22:40 · 0 replies this month · Robert Hancock <hidden>
• STALE6843d Re: [PATCH 0/3] PM: Do not destroy/create devices while suspended
  2007-12-24 15:51 · 0 replies this month · Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>
• STALE6845d Re: do not stop/start devices in suspend/resume path: the SCSI case
  2007-12-24 03:21 · 0 replies this month · Bjorn Helgaas <hidden>
• STALE6845d Re: do not stop/start devices in suspend/resume path: the SCSI case
  2007-12-24 01:43 · 0 replies this month · Stephane Ascoet <hidden>
• STALE6843d [PATCH 3/3] PM: Do not destroy/create devices while suspended in cpuid.c
  2007-12-24 00:57 · 0 replies this month · Rafael J. Wysocki <hidden>
• STALE6843d [PATCH 2/3] PM: Do not destroy/create devices while suspended in mce_64.c
  2007-12-24 00:57 · 0 replies this month · Rafael J. Wysocki <hidden>
• STALE6843d [PATCH 1/3] PM: Do not destroy/create devices while suspended in msr.c
  2007-12-24 00:56 · 0 replies this month · Rafael J. Wysocki <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies [PATCH 0/3] PM: Do not destroy/create devices while suspended
  2007-12-24 00:55 · 0 replies this month · Rafael J. Wysocki <hidden>
• STALE6837d USB storage powersaving patches
  2007-12-22 03:13 · 5 replies this month · Pavel Machek <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies Re: OOPS: 2.6.24-rc5-mm1 -- EIP is at r_show+0x2a/0x70 -- (triggered by "cat /proc/iomem" AFTER suspend-to-disk/resume)
  2007-12-21 21:19 · 0 replies this month · Miles Lane <hidden>
• STALE6847d Re: OOPS: 2.6.24-rc5-mm1 -- EIP is at r_show+0x2a/0x70 -- (triggered by "cat /proc/iomem" AFTER suspend-to-disk/resume)
  2007-12-21 20:00 · 0 replies this month · Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
• STALE6847d Re: OOPS: 2.6.24-rc5-mm1 -- EIP is at r_show+0x2a/0x70 -- (triggered by "cat /proc/iomem" AFTER suspend-to-disk/resume)
  2007-12-21 16:06 · 0 replies this month · Miles Lane <hidden>
• STALE6848d Re: [PATCH 2/3 -mm] kexec jump -v8 : add write support to oldmem device
  2007-12-21 12:50 · 0 replies this month · huang ying <hidden>
• STALE6848d Re: [PATCH 2/3 -mm] kexec jump -v8 : add write support to oldmem device
  2007-12-21 10:58 · 0 replies this month · Bernhard Walle <hidden>
• STALE6848d Re: [PATCH 2/3 -mm] kexec jump -v8 : add write support to oldmem device
  2007-12-21 10:17 · 0 replies this month · Pavel Machek <hidden>
• STALE6831d Re: [PATCH 0/3 -mm] kexec jump -v8
  2007-12-21 08:53 · 0 replies this month · Huang, Ying <hidden>
• STALE6831d Re: [PATCH 0/3 -mm] kexec jump -v8
  2007-12-21 08:35 · 0 replies this month · Nigel Cunningham <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies [PATCH 3/3 -mm] kexec jump -v8 : access memory image of kexec_image
  2007-12-21 07:33 · 0 replies this month · Huang, Ying <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies [PATCH 2/3 -mm] kexec jump -v8 : add write support to oldmem device
  2007-12-21 07:33 · 0 replies this month · Huang, Ying <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies [PATCH 1/3 -mm] kexec jump -v8 : kexec jump basic
  2007-12-21 07:33 · 0 replies this month · Huang, Ying <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies [PATCH 0/3 -mm] kexec jump -v8
  2007-12-21 07:33 · 0 replies this month · Huang, Ying <hidden>
• STALE6847d Re: OOPS: 2.6.24-rc5-mm1 -- EIP is at r_show+0x2a/0x70 -- (triggered by "cat /proc/iomem" AFTER suspend-to-disk/resume)
  2007-12-21 06:29 · 2 replies this month · Miles Lane <hidden>
• STALE6847d Re: OOPS: 2.6.24-rc5-mm1 -- EIP is at r_show+0x2a/0x70 -- (triggered by "cat /proc/iomem" AFTER suspend-to-disk/resume)
  2007-12-20 17:32 · 0 replies this month · Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
• DORMANTno replies Re: 2.6.24-rc5-mm1 -- inconsistent {in-hardirq-W} -> {hardirq-on-W} usage -- pm-hibernate/9940 [HC0[0]:SC0[0]:HE1:SE1]
  2007-12-20 15:46 · 0 replies this month · Rafael J. Wysocki <hidden>
• STALE6847d Re: OOPS: 2.6.24-rc5-mm1 -- EIP is at r_show+0x2a/0x70 -- (triggered by "cat /proc/iomem" AFTER suspend-to-disk/resume)
  2007-12-20 13:38 · 0 replies this month · Miles Lane <hidden>
• STALE6849d Re: 2.6.24-rc5-mm1 -- inconsistent {in-hardirq-W} -> {hardirq-on-W} usage -- pm-hibernate/9940 [HC0[0]:SC0[0]:HE1:SE1]
  2007-12-20 04:34 · 0 replies this month · Miles Lane <hidden>
• STALE6849d Re: 2.6.24-rc5-mm1 -- inconsistent {in-hardirq-W} -> {hardirq-on-W} usage -- pm-hibernate/9940 [HC0[0]:SC0[0]:HE1:SE1]
  2007-12-20 01:31 · 1 reply this month · Miles Lane <hidden>
• STALE6849d Re: 2.6.24-rc5-mm1 -- inconsistent {in-hardirq-W} -> {hardirq-on-W} usage -- pm-hibernate/9940 [HC0[0]:SC0[0]:HE1:SE1]
  2007-12-20 01:11 · 0 replies this month · Miles Lane <hidden>
• STALE6849d Re: 2.6.24-rc5-mm1 -- inconsistent {in-hardirq-W} -> {hardirq-on-W} usage -- pm-hibernate/9940 [HC0[0]:SC0[0]:HE1:SE1]
  2007-12-20 00:09 · 0 replies this month · Rafael J. Wysocki <hidden>
• STALE6849d Re: 2.6.24-rc5-mm1 -- inconsistent {in-hardirq-W} -> {hardirq-on-W} usage -- pm-hibernate/9940 [HC0[0]:SC0[0]:HE1:SE1]
  2007-12-19 23:29 · 0 replies this month · Rafael J. Wysocki <hidden>
• STALE6849d Re: 2.6.24-rc5-mm1 -- inconsistent {in-hardirq-W} -> {hardirq-on-W} usage -- pm-hibernate/9940 [HC0[0]:SC0[0]:HE1:SE1]
  2007-12-19 23:22 · 0 replies this month · Christoph Lameter <hidden>
• STALE6849d Re: 2.6.24-rc5-mm1 -- inconsistent {in-hardirq-W} -> {hardirq-on-W} usage -- pm-hibernate/9940 [HC0[0]:SC0[0]:HE1:SE1]
  2007-12-19 20:02 · 0 replies this month · Christoph Lameter <hidden>
• STALE6849d Re: 2.6.24-rc5-mm1 -- inconsistent {in-hardirq-W} -> {hardirq-on-W} usage -- pm-hibernate/9940 [HC0[0]:SC0[0]:HE1:SE1]
  2007-12-19 19:23 · 0 replies this month · Daniel Walker <hidden>
• STALE6849d Re: 2.6.24-rc5-mm1 -- inconsistent {in-hardirq-W} -> {hardirq-on-W} usage -- pm-hibernate/9940 [HC0[0]:SC0[0]:HE1:SE1]
  2007-12-19 18:42 · 0 replies this month · Daniel Walker <hidden>
• STALE6849d 2.6.24-rc5-mm1 -- WARNING: at arch/x86/kernel/smp_32.c:561 native_smp_call_function_mask()
  2007-12-19 15:06 · 1 reply this month · Miles Lane <hidden>
• STALE6851d Re: [PATCH 1/4 -mm] kexec based hibernation -v7 : kexec jump
  2007-12-18 08:34 · 0 replies this month · Huang, Ying <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies Re: [PATCH] PM: acquire device locks prior to suspending
  2007-12-17 22:50 · 0 replies this month · Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>
• DORMANTno replies [PATCH] include/linux/: Spelling fixes
  2007-12-17 19:40 · 0 replies this month · Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
• STALE6845d Re: broken suspend, sometimes (drm related) [Was: 2.6.24-rc5-mm1]
  2007-12-17 16:55 · 0 replies this month · Jesse Barnes <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies [PATCH v2] apm-emulation: notify about all suspend events, not just apm invoked ones
  2007-12-17 01:12 · 0 replies this month · Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
• STALE6813d [PATCH] PM: invoke suspend notifications after console switch
  2007-12-17 01:09 · 0 replies this month · Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
• STALE6822d [PATCH 0/2] Suspend: More cleanups
  2007-12-17 00:27 · 4 replies this month · Rafael J. Wysocki <hidden>