Re: [PATCH v2] perf metric: Reduce multiplexing with duration_time
From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>
Date: 2021-11-30 19:24:40
Also in:
lkml
Em Tue, Nov 30, 2021 at 07:11:36PM +0100, Jiri Olsa escreveu:
On Mon, Nov 29, 2021 at 09:46:31AM -0800, Ian Rogers wrote:quoted
On Sun, Nov 28, 2021 at 8:23 AM Jiri Olsa [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
On Tue, Nov 23, 2021 at 05:52:26PM -0800, Ian Rogers wrote:quoted
It is common to use the same counters with and without duration_time. The ID sharing code treats duration_time as if it were a hardware event placed in the same group. This causes unnecessary multiplexing such as in the following example where l3_cache_access isn't shared: $ perf stat -M l3 -a sleep 1 Performance counter stats for 'system wide': 3,117,007 l3_cache_miss # 199.5 MB/s l3_rd_bw # 43.6 % l3_hits # 56.4 % l3_miss (50.00%) 5,526,447 l3_cache_access (50.00%) 5,392,435 l3_cache_access # 5389191.2 access/s l3_access_rate (50.00%) 1,000,601,901 ns duration_time 1.000601901 seconds time elapsed Fix this by placing duration_time in all groups unless metric sharing has been disabled on the command line: $ perf stat -M l3 -a sleep 1 Performance counter stats for 'system wide': 3,597,972 l3_cache_miss # 230.3 MB/s l3_rd_bw # 48.0 % l3_hits # 52.0 % l3_miss 6,914,459 l3_cache_access # 6909935.9 access/s l3_access_rate 1,000,654,579 ns duration_time 1.000654579 seconds time elapsed $ perf stat --metric-no-merge -M l3 -a sleep 1 Performance counter stats for 'system wide': 3,501,834 l3_cache_miss # 53.5 % l3_miss (24.99%) 6,548,173 l3_cache_access (24.99%) 3,417,622 l3_cache_miss # 45.7 % l3_hits (25.04%) 6,294,062 l3_cache_access (25.04%) 5,923,238 l3_cache_access # 5919688.1 access/s l3_access_rate (24.99%) 1,000,599,683 ns duration_time 3,607,486 l3_cache_miss # 230.9 MB/s l3_rd_bw (49.97%) 1.000599683 seconds time elapsed v2. Doesn't count duration_time in the metric_list_cmp function that sorts larger metrics first. Without this a metric with duration_time and an event is sorted the same as a metric with two events, possibly not allowing the first metric to share with the second.hum, isn't the change about adding duration_time in every metric? or you could still end up with metric without duration_timeIt is about adding duration_time to all metrics. Sorting of the metrics by number of IDs happens before we insert duration_time which happens just prior to parsing. duration_time needn't be inserted if --metric-no-merge is passed.I see, so that sorting takes place before it's added, makes sense then Acked-by: Jiri Olsa <redacted>
Thanks, applied. - Arnaldo