Thread (44 messages) 44 messages, 9 authors, 2021-05-03

Re: [Patch v4 1/3] lib: Restrict cpumask_local_spread to houskeeping CPUs

From: Thomas Gleixner <hidden>
Date: 2021-01-28 20:06:40
Also in: linux-api, lkml

On Thu, Jan 28 2021 at 13:59, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
quoted
The whole pile wants to be reverted. It's simply broken in several ways.
I was asking for your comments on interaction with CPU hotplug :-)
Which I answered in an seperate mail :)
So housekeeping_cpumask has multiple meanings. In this case:
...
So as long as the meaning of the flags are respected, seems
alright.
Yes. Stuff like the managed interrupts preference for housekeeping CPUs
when a affinity mask spawns housekeeping and isolated is perfectly
fine. It's well thought out and has no limitations.
Nitesh, is there anything preventing this from being fixed
in userspace ? (as Thomas suggested previously).
Everything with is not managed can be steered by user space.

Thanks,

        tglx
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help