Fixes the following sparse warnings:
drivers/ntb/hw/mscc/ntb_hw_switchtec.c:1552:6: warning:
symbol 'switchtec_ntb_remove' was not declared. Should it be static?
Signed-off-by: Wei Yongjun <redacted>
---
drivers/ntb/hw/mscc/ntb_hw_switchtec.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/ntb/hw/mscc/ntb_hw_switchtec.c b/drivers/ntb/hw/mscc/ntb_hw_switchtec.c
index a1d547b6..f624ae2 100644
--- a/drivers/ntb/hw/mscc/ntb_hw_switchtec.c
+++ b/drivers/ntb/hw/mscc/ntb_hw_switchtec.c
@@ -1549,8 +1549,8 @@ static int switchtec_ntb_add(struct device *dev,
return rc;
}
-void switchtec_ntb_remove(struct device *dev,
- struct class_interface *class_intf)
+static void switchtec_ntb_remove(struct device *dev,
+ struct class_interface *class_intf)
{
struct switchtec_dev *stdev = to_stdev(dev);
struct switchtec_ntb *sndev = stdev->sndev;
Looks good, thanks.
Reviewed-by: Logan Gunthorpe <logang@deltatee.com>
Logan
On 22/01/18 07:09 PM, Wei Yongjun wrote:
quoted hunk
Fixes the following sparse warnings:
drivers/ntb/hw/mscc/ntb_hw_switchtec.c:1552:6: warning:
symbol 'switchtec_ntb_remove' was not declared. Should it be static?
Signed-off-by: Wei Yongjun <redacted>
---
drivers/ntb/hw/mscc/ntb_hw_switchtec.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/ntb/hw/mscc/ntb_hw_switchtec.c b/drivers/ntb/hw/mscc/ntb_hw_switchtec.c
index a1d547b6..f624ae2 100644
--- a/drivers/ntb/hw/mscc/ntb_hw_switchtec.c
+++ b/drivers/ntb/hw/mscc/ntb_hw_switchtec.c
@@ -1549,8 +1549,8 @@ static int switchtec_ntb_add(struct device *dev,
return rc;
}
-void switchtec_ntb_remove(struct device *dev,
- struct class_interface *class_intf)
+static void switchtec_ntb_remove(struct device *dev,
+ struct class_interface *class_intf)
{
struct switchtec_dev *stdev = to_stdev(dev);
struct switchtec_ntb *sndev = stdev->sndev;
On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 09:35:52AM -0700, Logan Gunthorpe wrote:
Looks good, thanks.
Reviewed-by: Logan Gunthorpe <logang@deltatee.com>
Applied to ntb-next
Thanks,
Jon
Logan
On 22/01/18 07:09 PM, Wei Yongjun wrote:
quoted
Fixes the following sparse warnings:
drivers/ntb/hw/mscc/ntb_hw_switchtec.c:1552:6: warning:
symbol 'switchtec_ntb_remove' was not declared. Should it be static?
Signed-off-by: Wei Yongjun <redacted>
---
drivers/ntb/hw/mscc/ntb_hw_switchtec.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/ntb/hw/mscc/ntb_hw_switchtec.c b/drivers/ntb/hw/mscc/ntb_hw_switchtec.c
index a1d547b6..f624ae2 100644
--- a/drivers/ntb/hw/mscc/ntb_hw_switchtec.c
+++ b/drivers/ntb/hw/mscc/ntb_hw_switchtec.c
@@ -1549,8 +1549,8 @@ static int switchtec_ntb_add(struct device *dev,
return rc;
}
-void switchtec_ntb_remove(struct device *dev,
- struct class_interface *class_intf)
+static void switchtec_ntb_remove(struct device *dev,
+ struct class_interface *class_intf)
{
struct switchtec_dev *stdev = to_stdev(dev);
struct switchtec_ntb *sndev = stdev->sndev;
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "linux-ntb" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to linux-ntb+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to linux-ntb@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/linux-ntb/14b5eb05-c152-6a30-d590-881600a8a72f%40deltatee.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.