linux-next: manual merge of the f2fs tree with the fscrypt tree

Hi all,

Today's linux-next merge of the f2fs tree got a conflict in:

  Documentation/filesystems/f2fs.rst

between commit:

  38dff4e50c12 ("f2fs: add inline encryption support")

from the fscrypt tree and commit:

  a7c77c387b60 ("f2fs: fix to document reserved special compression extension")

from the f2fs tree.

I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating
with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
complex conflicts.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

diff --cc Documentation/filesystems/f2fs.rst
index 8b4fac44f4e1,535021c46260..000000000000

--- a/Documentation/filesystems/f2fs.rst
+++ b/Documentation/filesystems/f2fs.rst

@@@ -258,13 -258,8 +258,15 @@@ compress_extension=%s  Support adding s
                         on compression extension list and enable compression on
                         these file by default rather than to enable it via ioctl.
                         For other files, we can still enable compression via ioctl.
+                        Note that, there is one reserved special extension '*', it
+                        can be set to enable compression for all files.
 +inlinecrypt
 +                       When possible, encrypt/decrypt the contents of encrypted
 +                       files using the blk-crypto framework rather than
 +                       filesystem-layer encryption. This allows the use of
 +                       inline encryption hardware. The on-disk format is
 +                       unaffected. For more details, see
 +                       Documentation/block/inline-encryption.rst.
  ====================== ============================================================
  
  Debugfs Entries

Hi all,

On Wed, 8 Jul 2020 10:38:58 +1000 Stephen Rothwell [off-list ref] wrote:

This is now a conflict between the f2fs tree and Linus' tree.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell