linux-next: manual merge of the sparc-next tree with the arm64 tree

Hi David,

Today's linux-next merge of the sparc-next tree got a conflict in:

  arch/x86/kernel/signal_compat.c

between commit:

  266da65e9156 ("signal: Add FPE_FLTUNK si_code for undiagnosable fp exceptions")

from the arm64 tree and commit:

  d84bb709aa4a ("signals, sparc: Add signal codes for ADI violations")

from the sparc-next tree.

I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating
with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
complex conflicts.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

diff --cc arch/x86/kernel/signal_compat.c
index d2884e951bb5,838a4dc90a6d..000000000000

--- a/arch/x86/kernel/signal_compat.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/signal_compat.c

@@@ -26,8 -26,8 +26,8 @@@ static inline void signal_compat_build_
  	 * new fields are handled in copy_siginfo_to_user32()!
  	 */
  	BUILD_BUG_ON(NSIGILL  != 11);
 -	BUILD_BUG_ON(NSIGFPE  != 13);
 +	BUILD_BUG_ON(NSIGFPE  != 14);
- 	BUILD_BUG_ON(NSIGSEGV != 4);
+ 	BUILD_BUG_ON(NSIGSEGV != 7);
  	BUILD_BUG_ON(NSIGBUS  != 5);
  	BUILD_BUG_ON(NSIGTRAP != 4);
  	BUILD_BUG_ON(NSIGCHLD != 6);

Hi all,

On Wed, 21 Mar 2018 10:34:08 +1100 Stephen Rothwell [off-list ref] wrote:

This is now a conflict between the adm64 tree and Linus' tree.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell