linux-next: manual merge of the vfs tree with the nsfd tree

2 messages, 2 authors, 2016-01-11 · open the first message on its own page

linux-next: manual merge of the vfs tree with the nsfd tree

From: Stephen Rothwell <hidden>
Date: 2016-01-11 01:16:37

Hi Al,

Today's linux-next merge of the vfs tree got a conflict in:

  fs/namei.c

between commit:

  1932ac9d7cef ("nfsd: don't hold i_mutex over userspace upcalls")

from the nfsd tree and commit:

  bbddca8e8fac ("nfsd: don't hold i_mutex over userspace upcalls")

from the vfs tree.

Similar patch, but slightly different. :-(

I fixed it up (I used the vfs tree version) and can carry the fix as
necessary (no action is required).

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@canb.auug.org.au

Re: linux-next: manual merge of the vfs tree with the nsfd tree

From: J. Bruce Fields <hidden>
Date: 2016-01-11 02:59:22

On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 12:16:32PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
Today's linux-next merge of the vfs tree got a conflict in:

  fs/namei.c

between commit:

  1932ac9d7cef ("nfsd: don't hold i_mutex over userspace upcalls")

from the nfsd tree and commit:

  bbddca8e8fac ("nfsd: don't hold i_mutex over userspace upcalls")

from the vfs tree.

Similar patch, but slightly different. :-(

I fixed it up (I used the vfs tree version) and can carry the fix as
necessary (no action is required).
Thanks, I've dropped my version.

--b.
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help