Thread (29 messages) 29 messages, 10 authors, 2012-05-08

Re: inux-next: Tree for Apr 27 (uml + mm/memcontrol.c)

From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: 2012-04-27 23:25:04
Also in: lkml

On Fri, 27 Apr 2012 16:14:52 -0700 (PDT)
David Rientjes [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
Minor matter: that's non-responsive to my suggestion.
If it's moved to a new cgroup then we can just go back to the original 
point that I made as was trying to avoid: adding #ifdefs all over 
mm/memcontrol.c in a dozen or so places.  A mm/hugetlbcg.c would only be 
built, natually, when we have "depends on HUGETLB_PAGE" and 
linux/hugetlb.h takes care of the rest (setting HUGE_MAX_HSTATE for archs 
that don't define it themselves, in other words only one hugepage size).
And if it isn't moved to a new cgroup then your
memcg-add-hugetlb-extension-fix.patch is suboptimal.  Why is this so
hard?
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help