From: Biju Das <biju.das.jz@bp.renesas.com> Date: 2022-09-26 17:42:58
Due to clk rounding errors on RZ/G2L platforms, it selects a clock source
with a lower clock rate compared to a higher one.
For eg: The rounding error (533333333 Hz / 4 * 4 = 533333332 Hz < 5333333
33 Hz) selects a clk source of 400 MHz instead of 533.333333 MHz.
This patch fixes this issue by adding a margin of (1/1024) higher to
the clock rate.
Signed-off-by: Biju Das <biju.das.jz@bp.renesas.com>
Tested-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>
---
v3->v4:
* Added Tested-by tag from Wolfram.
* Updated commit description and code comment with real example.
v2->v3:
* Renamed the variable new_clock_margin->new_upper_limit in renesas_sdhi_clk_
update()
* Moved setting of new_upper_limit outside for loop.
* Updated the comment section to mention the rounding errors and merged with
existing comment out side the for loop.
* Updated commit description.
v1->v2:
* Add a comment explaining why margin is needed and set it to
that particular value.
---
drivers/mmc/host/renesas_sdhi_core.c | 19 +++++++++++++++++--
1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
@@ -128,6 +128,7 @@ static unsigned int renesas_sdhi_clk_update(struct tmio_mmc_host *host,structclk*ref_clk=priv->clk;unsignedintfreq,diff,best_freq=0,diff_min=~0;unsignedintnew_clock,clkh_shift=0;+unsignedintnew_upper_limit;inti;/*
@@ -153,10 +154,17 @@ static unsigned int renesas_sdhi_clk_update(struct tmio_mmc_host *host,*greaterthan,new_clock.Aswecandivideby1<<ifor*anyiin[0,9]wewanttheinputclocktobeascloseas*possible,butnogreaterthan,new_clock<<i.+*+*Addanupperlimitof1/1024ratehighertotheclockratetofix+*clkratejumpingtolowerrateduetoroundingerror(eg:RZ/G2Lhas+*3clksources533.333333MHz,400MHzand266.666666MHz.Therequest+*for533.333333MHzwillselectsaslower400MHzduetorounding+*error(533333333Hz/4*4=533333332Hz<533333333Hz)).*/+new_upper_limit=(new_clock<<i)+((new_clock<<i)>>10);for(i=min(9,ilog2(UINT_MAX/new_clock));i>=0;i--){freq=clk_round_rate(ref_clk,new_clock<<i);-if(freq>(new_clock<<i)){+if(freq>new_upper_limit){/* Too fast; look for a slightly slower option */freq=clk_round_rate(ref_clk,(new_clock<<i)/4*3);if(freq>(new_clock<<i))
@@ -181,6 +189,7 @@ static unsigned int renesas_sdhi_clk_update(struct tmio_mmc_host *host,staticvoidrenesas_sdhi_set_clock(structtmio_mmc_host*host,unsignedintnew_clock){+unsignedintclk_margin;u32clk=0,clock;sd_ctrl_write16(host,CTL_SD_CARD_CLK_CTL,~CLK_CTL_SCLKEN&
From: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com> Date: 2022-09-26 19:08:43
On Mon, Sep 26, 2022 at 06:10:02PM +0100, Biju Das wrote:
Due to clk rounding errors on RZ/G2L platforms, it selects a clock source
with a lower clock rate compared to a higher one.
For eg: The rounding error (533333333 Hz / 4 * 4 = 533333332 Hz < 5333333
33 Hz) selects a clk source of 400 MHz instead of 533.333333 MHz.
This patch fixes this issue by adding a margin of (1/1024) higher to
the clock rate.
Signed-off-by: Biju Das <biju.das.jz@bp.renesas.com>
Tested-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>
Looks very good to me now! Thanks for keeping at it:
Reviewed-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>
Hi Biju,
On Mon, Sep 26, 2022 at 7:10 PM Biju Das [off-list ref] wrote:
Due to clk rounding errors on RZ/G2L platforms, it selects a clock source
with a lower clock rate compared to a higher one.
For eg: The rounding error (533333333 Hz / 4 * 4 = 533333332 Hz < 5333333
33 Hz) selects a clk source of 400 MHz instead of 533.333333 MHz.
This patch fixes this issue by adding a margin of (1/1024) higher to
the clock rate.
Signed-off-by: Biju Das <biju.das.jz@bp.renesas.com>
Tested-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>
---
v3->v4:
* Added Tested-by tag from Wolfram.
* Updated commit description and code comment with real example.
Thanks for the update!
Unfortunately this patch causes a change in the clock frequencies
used on R-Car M2-W:
-clk_summary: sd0 97500000
+clk_summary: sd0 32500000
-clk_summary: sdhi0 97500000
+clk_summary: sdhi0 32500000
-clk_summary: sd3 12786885
+clk_summary: sd3 12187500
-clk_summary: sdhi3 12786885
+clk_summary: sdhi3 12187500
-clk_summary: sd2 12786885
+clk_summary: sd2 12187500
-clk_summary: sdhi2 12786885
+clk_summary: sdhi2 12187500
@@ -153,10 +154,17 @@ static unsigned int renesas_sdhi_clk_update(struct tmio_mmc_host *host, * greater than, new_clock. As we can divide by 1 << i for * any i in [0, 9] we want the input clock to be as close as * possible, but no greater than, new_clock << i.+ *+ * Add an upper limit of 1/1024 rate higher to the clock rate to fix+ * clk rate jumping to lower rate due to rounding error (eg: RZ/G2L has+ * 3 clk sources 533.333333 MHz, 400 MHz and 266.666666 MHz. The request+ * for 533.333333 MHz will selects a slower 400 MHz due to rounding+ * error (533333333 Hz / 4 * 4 = 533333332 Hz < 533333333 Hz)). */+ new_upper_limit = (new_clock << i) + ((new_clock << i) >> 10);
Mea culpa: while new_clock is a constant inside the loop, i is not!
So it should be moved back inside the loop below.
With that change, R-Car M2-W is happy again, and I noticed no
regression on R-Car H3 ES2.0.
quoted hunk
for (i = min(9, ilog2(UINT_MAX / new_clock)); i >= 0; i--) { freq = clk_round_rate(ref_clk, new_clock << i);- if (freq > (new_clock << i)) {+ if (freq > new_upper_limit) { /* Too fast; look for a slightly slower option */ freq = clk_round_rate(ref_clk, (new_clock << i) / 4 * 3); if (freq > (new_clock << i))
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Probably this should become new_upper_limit too, for consistency?
It doesn't seem to matter in my testing, though.
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
From: Biju Das <biju.das.jz@bp.renesas.com> Date: 2022-09-28 10:57:15
Hi Geert,
Thanks for the testing.
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] mmc: renesas_sdhi: Fix rounding errors
Hi Biju,
On Mon, Sep 26, 2022 at 7:10 PM Biju Das [off-list ref]
wrote:
quoted
Due to clk rounding errors on RZ/G2L platforms, it selects a clock
source with a lower clock rate compared to a higher one.
For eg: The rounding error (533333333 Hz / 4 * 4 = 533333332 Hz <
5333333
33 Hz) selects a clk source of 400 MHz instead of 533.333333 MHz.
This patch fixes this issue by adding a margin of (1/1024) higher to
the clock rate.
Signed-off-by: Biju Das <biju.das.jz@bp.renesas.com>
Tested-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>
---
v3->v4:
* Added Tested-by tag from Wolfram.
* Updated commit description and code comment with real example.
Thanks for the update!
Unfortunately this patch causes a change in the clock frequencies used
on R-Car M2-W:
-clk_summary: sd0 97500000
+clk_summary: sd0 32500000
-clk_summary: sdhi0 97500000
+clk_summary: sdhi0 32500000
-clk_summary: sd3 12786885
+clk_summary: sd3 12187500
-clk_summary: sdhi3 12786885
+clk_summary: sdhi3 12187500
-clk_summary: sd2 12786885
+clk_summary: sd2 12187500
-clk_summary: sdhi2 12786885
+clk_summary: sdhi2 12187500
* greater than, new_clock. As we can divide by 1 << i for * any i in [0, 9] we want the input clock to be as close as * possible, but no greater than, new_clock << i.+ *+ * Add an upper limit of 1/1024 rate higher to the clock
rate to fix
quoted
+ * clk rate jumping to lower rate due to rounding error (eg:
10);
Mea culpa: while new_clock is a constant inside the loop, i is not!
So it should be moved back inside the loop below.
With that change, R-Car M2-W is happy again, and I noticed no
regression on R-Car H3 ES2.0.
OK.
quoted
for (i = min(9, ilog2(UINT_MAX / new_clock)); i >= 0; i--) { freq = clk_round_rate(ref_clk, new_clock << i);- if (freq > (new_clock << i)) {+ if (freq > new_upper_limit) { /* Too fast; look for a slightly slower
option */
quoted
freq = clk_round_rate(ref_clk, (new_clock <<
i) / 4 * 3);
quoted
if (freq > (new_clock << i))
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Probably this
should become new_upper_limit too, for consistency?
It doesn't seem to matter in my testing, though.
OK. Will do the below change in next version.
- new_upper_limit = (new_clock << i) + ((new_clock << i) >> 10);
for (i = min(9, ilog2(UINT_MAX / new_clock)); i >= 0; i--) {
freq = clk_round_rate(ref_clk, new_clock << i);
+ new_upper_limit = (new_clock << i) + ((new_clock << i) >> 10);
if (freq > new_upper_limit) {
/* Too fast; look for a slightly slower option */
freq = clk_round_rate(ref_clk, (new_clock << i) / 4 * 3);
- if (freq > (new_clock << i))
+ if (freq > new_upper_limit)
continue;
}
Cheers,
Biju
From: Biju Das <biju.das.jz@bp.renesas.com> Date: 2022-09-28 11:03:41
Hi Geert,
Subject: RE: [PATCH v4] mmc: renesas_sdhi: Fix rounding errors
Hi Geert,
Thanks for the testing.
quoted
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] mmc: renesas_sdhi: Fix rounding errors
Hi Biju,
On Mon, Sep 26, 2022 at 7:10 PM Biju Das
[off-list ref]
quoted
wrote:
quoted
Due to clk rounding errors on RZ/G2L platforms, it selects a clock
source with a lower clock rate compared to a higher one.
For eg: The rounding error (533333333 Hz / 4 * 4 = 533333332 Hz <
5333333
33 Hz) selects a clk source of 400 MHz instead of 533.333333 MHz.
This patch fixes this issue by adding a margin of (1/1024) higher
to
quoted
quoted
the clock rate.
Signed-off-by: Biju Das <biju.das.jz@bp.renesas.com>
Tested-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>
---
v3->v4:
* Added Tested-by tag from Wolfram.
* Updated commit description and code comment with real example.
Thanks for the update!
Unfortunately this patch causes a change in the clock frequencies
Other than this, it is better to test performance as well to
check any regression due to second fix in this patch.
Note:
After mounting, I use below command to check performance.
dd if=/dev/zero of=test oflag=direct bs=8M count=64
Cheers,
Biju
10);
Mea culpa: while new_clock is a constant inside the loop, i is not!
So it should be moved back inside the loop below.
With that change, R-Car M2-W is happy again, and I noticed no
regression on R-Car H3 ES2.0.
OK.
quoted
quoted
for (i = min(9, ilog2(UINT_MAX / new_clock)); i >= 0; i--)
{
quoted
quoted
freq = clk_round_rate(ref_clk, new_clock << i);- if (freq > (new_clock << i)) {+ if (freq > new_upper_limit) { /* Too fast; look for a slightly slower
option */
quoted
freq = clk_round_rate(ref_clk, (new_clock
<<
quoted
i) / 4 * 3);
quoted
if (freq > (new_clock << i))
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Probably this
should become new_upper_limit too, for consistency?
It doesn't seem to matter in my testing, though.
OK. Will do the below change in next version.
- new_upper_limit = (new_clock << i) + ((new_clock << i) >> 10);
for (i = min(9, ilog2(UINT_MAX / new_clock)); i >= 0; i--) {
freq = clk_round_rate(ref_clk, new_clock << i);
+ new_upper_limit = (new_clock << i) + ((new_clock << i) >>
10);
if (freq > new_upper_limit) {
/* Too fast; look for a slightly slower option */
freq = clk_round_rate(ref_clk, (new_clock << i) / 4 *
3);
- if (freq > (new_clock << i))
+ if (freq > new_upper_limit)
continue;
}
Cheers,
Biju