linux-mm archive · July 2004

121 messages across 35 threads, ordered by last activity .

• STALE8030d [PATCH] token based thrashing control
  2004-07-31 11:43 · 2 replies this month · Rik van Riel <hidden>
• STALE8034d Scaling problem with shmem_sb_info->stat_lock
  2004-07-31 03:37 · 23 replies this month · Brent Casavant <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies important looking younger is less expensive
  2004-07-30 23:00 · 0 replies this month · kory eary <hidden>
• STALE8034d [PATCH] don't pass mem_map into init functions
  2004-07-30 14:33 · 8 replies this month · Dave Hansen <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies Fw: alert enjoy your partner tonight
  2004-07-29 17:06 · 0 replies this month · stanton riesenweber <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies How to get Data Segment Size ?
  2004-07-29 12:20 · 0 replies this month · matrix reloaded <hidden>
• STALE8036d [RFC][PATCH 2/2] perzone slab LRUs
  2004-07-29 01:55 · 2 replies this month · Nick Piggin <hidden>
• STALE8036d Use of __pa() with CONFIG_NONLINEAR
  2004-07-28 20:24 · 6 replies this month · Dave Hansen <hidden>
• STALE8028d [PATCH] break out zone free list initialization
  2004-07-28 17:26 · 1 reply this month · Dave Hansen <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies [PATCH 1/2] make shrinker_sem an rwsem
  2004-07-28 11:02 · 0 replies this month · Nick Piggin <hidden>
• STALE8037d [PATCH] Move cache_reap out of timer context
  2004-07-28 07:05 · 3 replies this month · Dimitri Sivanich <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies Protection of 'struct address_space'?
  2004-07-28 02:31 · 0 replies this month · Perez-Gonzalez, Inaky <hidden>
• STALE8037d Read-ahead code
  2004-07-27 13:38 · 1 reply this month · Luciano A. Stertz <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies Re: important improves vision
  2004-07-27 12:11 · 0 replies this month · hilton somers <hidden>
• STALE8038d lsattr: Inappropriate ioctl for device While reading flags!!!
  2004-07-27 06:41 · 1 reply this month · Aroop MP <hidden>
• STALE8038d [PATCH] Locking optimization for cache_reap
  2004-07-27 02:01 · 4 replies this month · Dimitri Sivanich <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies Symantec AVF detected an unrepairable virus in a message you sent (SYM:02475008441705934471)
  2004-07-27 00:59 · 0 replies this month · <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies Your message to Full-Disclosure awaits moderator approval
  2004-07-27 00:11 · 0 replies this month · <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies MM TODO for Linux 2.6
  2004-07-23 10:14 · 0 replies this month · Mithlesh Thukral <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies struct shmem_inode_info lock scaling
  2004-07-22 20:01 · 0 replies this month · Brent Casavant <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies [Fwd: vma list in struct address_space]
  2004-07-21 16:42 · 0 replies this month · Luciano A. Stertz <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies Get excellent job, Get better job!
  2004-07-20 06:51 · 0 replies this month · Jerri Steiner <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies Shopping for [mortgages] made easy
  2004-07-19 23:26 · 0 replies this month · Jan Shields <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies Popular software n at low low prices. theresa ddtaqjyt
  2004-07-18 15:39 · 0 replies this month · Valentin Hodges <hidden>
• STALE8031d [PATCH] /dev/zero page fault scaling
  2004-07-16 22:35 · 8 replies this month · Brent Casavant <hidden>
• STALE8050d [Fwd: remap_page_range() vs nopage()]
  2004-07-14 22:56 · 1 reply this month · Michel Hubert <hidden>
• STALE8050d [PATCH] memory hotremoval for linux-2.6.7 [0/16]
  2004-07-14 14:45 · 16 replies this month · Hirokazu Takahashi <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies RE: Which is the proper way to bring in the backing store behindaninode as an struct page?
  2004-07-09 00:45 · 0 replies this month · Perez-Gonzalez, Inaky <hidden>
• STALE8056d RE: Which is the proper way to bring in the backing store behindan inode as an struct page?
  2004-07-08 23:56 · 1 reply this month · Perez-Gonzalez, Inaky <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies Specialize in hard to qualify-borrowers
  2004-07-04 05:22 · 0 replies this month · Fred Santana <hidden>
• STALE8062d RE: Which is the proper way to bring in the backing store behind an inode as an struct page?
  2004-07-03 05:52 · 1 reply this month · Perez-Gonzalez, Inaky <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies Re: [Bug 2995] New: madvise runs sucessfully for non-file mapped pages
  2004-07-02 21:42 · 0 replies this month · Andrew Morton <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies RE: Which is the proper way to bring in the backing store behindan inode as an struct page?
  2004-07-02 19:42 · 0 replies this month · Perez-Gonzalez, Inaky <hidden>
• STALE8062d Which is the proper way to bring in the backing store behind an inode as an struct page?
  2004-07-02 18:46 · 2 replies this month · Perez-Gonzalez, Inaky <hidden>
• STALE8064d new memory hotremoval patch
  2004-07-01 07:21 · 7 replies this month · IWAMOTO Toshihiro <hidden>