linux-mm archive · October 2001
98 messages across 52 threads, ordered by last activity .
-
DORMANTno replies
untested vm patch :-)
2001-10-31 15:08 · 0 replies this month · Matthew Wilcox <hidden> -
STALE9029d
Physical address of a user virtual address
2001-10-30 18:17 · 1 reply this month · <hidden> -
DORMANTno replies
Re: xmm2 - monitor Linux MM active/inactive lists graphically
2001-10-30 09:26 · 0 replies this month · Zlatko Calusic <hidden> -
DORMANTno replies
Re: xmm2 - monitor Linux MM active/inactive lists graphically
2001-10-30 08:56 · 0 replies this month · Jens Axboe <hidden> -
STALE9031d
Re: xmm2 - monitor Linux MM active/inactive lists graphically
2001-10-28 21:53 · 1 reply this month · Barry K. Nathan <hidden> -
DORMANTno replies
Re: xmm2 - monitor Linux MM active/inactive lists graphically
2001-10-28 19:23 · 0 replies this month · Alan Cox <hidden> -
DORMANTno replies
Re: xmm2 - monitor Linux MM active/inactive lists graphically
2001-10-28 19:02 · 0 replies this month · Andrew Morton <hidden> -
STALE9031d
Re: xmm2 - monitor Linux MM active/inactive lists graphically
2001-10-28 18:48 · 1 reply this month · Alan Cox <hidden> -
STALE9031d
Re: xmm2 - monitor Linux MM active/inactive lists graphically
2001-10-28 18:01 · 1 reply this month · Alan Cox <hidden> -
STALE9031d
Re: xmm2 - monitor Linux MM active/inactive lists graphically
2001-10-28 17:36 · 5 replies this month · Zlatko Calusic <hidden> -
DORMANTno replies
Re: xmm2 - monitor Linux MM active/inactive lists graphically
2001-10-28 05:05 · 0 replies this month · Mike Fedyk <hidden> -
DORMANTno replies
BOUNCE linux-mm: Filtered: kvack.org not in to/cc. (fwd)
2001-10-28 04:54 · 0 replies this month · "Benjamin C.R. LaHaise" <bcrl@kvack.org> -
DORMANTno replies
Re: xmm2 - monitor Linux MM active/inactive lists graphically
2001-10-27 13:28 · 0 replies this month · Giuliano Pochini <hidden> -
DORMANTno replies
Re: xmm2 - monitor Linux MM active/inactive lists graphically
2001-10-26 15:01 · 0 replies this month · Jens Axboe <hidden> -
DORMANTno replies
Re: xmm2 - monitor Linux MM active/inactive lists graphically
2001-10-26 14:39 · 0 replies this month · Jens Axboe <hidden> -
STALE9034d
xmm2 - monitor Linux MM active/inactive lists graphically
2001-10-26 10:08 · 9 replies this month · Zlatko Calusic <hidden> -
DORMANTno replies
Re: xmm2 - monitor Linux MM active/inactive lists graphically
2001-10-25 17:34 · 0 replies this month · Jens Axboe <hidden> -
DORMANTno replies
Removing pages from the MM
2001-10-23 20:07 · 0 replies this month · Duffey <hidden> -
DORMANTno replies
This Was Seen On 20/20
2001-10-22 07:11 · 0 replies this month · Rich <hidden> -
STALE9041d
mmap and raw disk devices...
2001-10-19 14:46 · 1 reply this month · Christopher Quinn <hidden> -
STALE9041d
[RFC][PATCH] free more swap space on exit()
2001-10-19 13:03 · 2 replies this month · Rik van Riel <hidden> -
DORMANTno replies
Re: Under what conditions are VMAs merged?
2001-10-18 01:58 · 0 replies this month · Benjamin LaHaise <hidden> -
DORMANTno replies
Under what conditions are VMAs merged?
2001-10-18 00:22 · 0 replies this month · "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com> -
DORMANTno replies
[CFT][PATCH] hogstop + eatcache fixes 2.4.12-ac3
2001-10-17 19:35 · 0 replies this month · Rik van Riel <hidden> -
STALE9042d
[PATCH] hogstop for 2.4.12-ac3
2001-10-17 17:55 · 3 replies this month · Rik van Riel <hidden> -
STALE9044d
Discardable mappings?
2001-10-16 17:02 · 1 reply this month · "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com> -
STALE9044d
Re: More questions...
2001-10-15 22:31 · 1 reply this month · Andi Kleen <hidden> -
STALE9044d
Re: More questions...
2001-10-15 22:11 · 1 reply this month · Andi Kleen <hidden> -
STALE9044d
More questions...
2001-10-15 22:02 · 2 replies this month · "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com> -
STALE9045d
VM question: side effect of not scanning Active pages?
2001-10-15 12:41 · 2 replies this month · Benjamin Redelings I <hidden> -
DORMANTno replies
Re: VM question: side effect of not scanning Active pages?
2001-10-14 23:58 · 0 replies this month · Joseph A Knapka <hidden> -
STALE9046d
Re: [CFT][PATCH] smoother VM for -ac
2001-10-14 07:37 · 1 reply this month · Andrea Arcangeli <hidden> -
STALE9048d
Re: Re[02]: [CFT][PATCH] smoother VM for -ac
2001-10-12 06:34 · 1 reply this month · Andrea Arcangeli <hidden> -
STALE9048d
Re[02]: [CFT][PATCH] smoother VM for -ac
2001-10-12 05:09 · 2 replies this month · John L. Males <hidden> -
DORMANTno replies
Re: [CFT][PATCH] smoother VM for -ac
2001-10-11 08:45 · 0 replies this month · Lorenzo Allegrucci <hidden> -
STALE9049d
[CFT][PATCH] smoother VM for -ac
2001-10-10 21:44 · 3 replies this month · Rik van Riel <hidden> -
DORMANTno replies
Re: [CFT][PATCH *] faster cache reclaim
2001-10-10 02:05 · 0 replies this month · Bill Huey <hidden> -
STALE9050d
[CFT][PATCH *] faster cache reclaim
2001-10-09 23:28 · 2 replies this month · Rik van Riel <hidden> -
STALE9050d
Re:
2001-10-09 20:56 · 2 replies this month · Joseph A Knapka <hidden> -
DORMANTno replies
Re: These bloody spams...
2001-10-05 04:31 · 0 replies this month · Benjamin LaHaise <hidden> -
DORMANTno replies
Re: __alloc_pages: 0-order allocation failed in 2.4.10
2001-10-05 00:55 · 0 replies this month · Andrea Arcangeli <hidden> -
DORMANTno replies
__alloc_pages: 0-order allocation failed in 2.4.10
2001-10-05 00:13 · 0 replies this month · Mariella Di Giacomo <hidden> -
DORMANTno replies
These bloody spams...
2001-10-04 14:45 · 0 replies this month · Matti Aarnio <hidden> -
DORMANTno replies
WWW.SURRIEL.COM
2001-10-04 13:49 · 0 replies this month · Crisha Wenston <hidden> -
DORMANTno replies
Re: weird memshared value
2001-10-03 23:33 · 0 replies this month · Roberto Orenstein <hidden> -
DORMANTno replies
Re: weird memshared value
2001-10-03 22:37 · 0 replies this month · Mike Fedyk <hidden> -
STALE9056d
weird memshared value
2001-10-03 21:30 · 2 replies this month · Roberto Orenstein <hidden> -
DORMANTno replies
Re: [admin WARNING] ECN is being enabled on kvack.org
2001-10-02 22:02 · 0 replies this month · Benjamin LaHaise <hidden> -
DORMANTno replies
How zone_balane_ratio is decided?
2001-10-02 10:35 · 0 replies this month · amey d inamdar <hidden> -
STALE9059d
Load control (was: Re: 2.4.9-ac16 good perfomer?)
2001-10-01 16:05 · 1 reply this month · Rik van Riel <hidden> -
STALE9059d
Re: Load control (was: Re: 2.4.9-ac16 good perfomer?)
2001-10-01 15:51 · 1 reply this month · Jesse Pollard <hidden> -
STALE9059d
Re: broken VM in 2.4.10-pre9
2001-10-01 13:00 · 1 reply this month · Pavel Machek <hidden>