Re: RFC: design for new VM

2 messages, 2 authors, 2000-08-03 · open the first message on its own page

Re: RFC: design for new VM

From: Chris Wedgwood <hidden>
Date: 2000-08-03 19:11:29

No, I don't think it does -- so for people running <= 1 1GB of ram
perhasp there should be a compile time option to not have all this
additional stuff linux will require?


  --cw
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux.eu.org/Linux-MM/

Re: RFC: design for new VM

From: Benjamin C.R. LaHaise <hidden>
Date: 2000-08-03 21:04:27

Please don't make this kind of head-stuck-in-sand argument before you've
had a chance to test the code.  If anything, choosing the correct page for
replacement is *more* important on a 4MB 386 where disks are typically
1/20th the speed of a desktop.

		-ben

On Fri, 4 Aug 2000, Chris Wedgwood wrote:
No, I don't think it does -- so for people running <= 1 1GB of ram
perhasp there should be a compile time option to not have all this
additional stuff linux will require?


  --cw
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux.eu.org/Linux-MM/
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux.eu.org/Linux-MM/
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help