# Re: \[PATCH\] MIPS: octeon: add explicit interface setup on E200

- From: Thomas Bogendoerfer \<tsbogend@alpha.franken.de\>
- Date: 2021-03-01 15:04:31 
- List: linux-mips
- Page: https://ratatoskr.run/linux-mips/2021/03/14528578
- Thread: https://ratatoskr.run/linux-mips/2021/02/14528568/t.md

```text
On Thu, Feb 25, 2021 at 05:52:58PM +0100, Adrian Schmutzler wrote:
> Define the device explicitly instead of having it fall into the
> "unknown board" default.
> 
> The board is already present in cvmx-bootinfo.h.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Adrian Schmutzler <redacted>
> ---
>  arch/mips/cavium-octeon/executive/cvmx-helper-board.c | 2 ++
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/mips/cavium-octeon/executive/cvmx-helper-board.c b/arch/mips/cavium-octeon/executive/cvmx-helper-board.c
> index abd11b7af22f..ce9d2553537e 100644
> --- a/arch/mips/cavium-octeon/executive/cvmx-helper-board.c
> +++ b/arch/mips/cavium-octeon/executive/cvmx-helper-board.c
> @@ -174,6 +174,8 @@ int cvmx_helper_board_get_mii_address(int ipd_port)
>  			return 7 - ipd_port;
>  		else
>  			return -1;
> +	case CVMX_BOARD_TYPE_UBNT_E200:
> +		return -1;
>  	case CVMX_BOARD_TYPE_KONTRON_S1901:
>  		if (ipd_port == CVMX_HELPER_BOARD_MGMT_IPD_PORT)
>  			return 1;

why doesn't the device tree provide the phy address ?

Thomas.

-- 
Crap can work. Given enough thrust pigs will fly, but it's not necessarily a
good idea.                                                [ RFC1925, 2.3 ]
```