Thread (1 message) 1 message, 1 author, 2001-07-21
  • (off-list ancestor, not in this archive)
  • Re: SHN_MIPS_SCOMMON · H . J . Lu <hidden> · 2001-07-21

Re: SHN_MIPS_SCOMMON

From: H . J . Lu <hidden>
Date: 2001-07-21 19:03:06

Possibly related (same subject, not in this thread)

On Sat, Jul 21, 2001 at 08:56:59PM +0200, Ralf Baechle wrote:
On Sat, Jul 21, 2001 at 11:13:16AM -0700, H . J . Lu wrote:
quoted
On Sat, Jul 21, 2001 at 12:12:29PM -0600, Greg Satz wrote:
quoted
The problem I ran into was making NFS as a kernel module. The resulting
sunrpc.o module crashed when insmod was run over it. Ralf's fix that all
compiles and links use -G 0 worked for me.
In that case, it is no linker bug. I believe -G 0 is required for
mips kernel modules.
Actually for all code; we don't support GP optimization in any of our code
models.
Even for the user space code? Do you have a testcase to show what
should be the desired behavior? As I understand, the SHN_MIPS_SCOMMON
section only appears in the relocatable files. You won't see it in
executables nor DSOs. Are there any problems with SHN_MIPS_SCOMMON
in .o files? Can we always pass `-G 0' to the assemebler for Linux.


H.J.
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help