On Wed, Sep 13, 2017 at 05:00:11PM +0200, Michael Kerrisk (man-opages) wrote:
Hi Yubin
quoted
Hi Michael,
Sorry that it took so long.
Following is the renew patch. I have corrected several formatting issues (i.e.,
\n , - , but I can't find anything wrong with ' ) and some typos. The only
issue I cannot solve is that the new `pthread_mutex_consistent(3)` page is too
short that it shows at the very bottom... please help with this.
Also, please find attached three verification snippets.
I've done some heavy editing, and added quite a few pieces to these pages,
and pushed the results to Git. Go take a look and let me know
of anything you think needs fixing. Thanks for these pages!
Good job. No objection, except a minor change and some code formatting change.
See the diff below.
Yubin
diff --git a/man3/pthread_mutexattr_setrobust.3 b/man3/pthread_mutexattr_setrobust.3
index e9e8e76..66b4bed 100644
--- a/man3/pthread_mutexattr_setrobust.3
+++ b/man3/pthread_mutexattr_setrobust.3
@@ -86,7 +86,7 @@ on the mutex will block indefinitely.
.TP
.B PTHREAD_MUTEX_ROBUST
If a mutex is initialized with the
-.BR PTHREAD_MUTEX_ROBUST ,
+.BR PTHREAD_MUTEX_ROBUST
attribute and its owner dies without unlocking it,
any future attempts to call
.BR pthread_mutex_lock (3)
@@ -255,22 +255,21 @@ main(int argc, char *argv[])
s = pthread_mutex_lock(&mtx);
if (s == EOWNERDEAD) {
printf("[main thread] pthread_mutex_lock() returned EOWNERDEAD\\n");
- printf("[main thread] Now make the mutex consistent\\n");
+ printf("[main thread] Now make the mutex consistent\\n");
s = pthread_mutex_consistent(&mtx);
if (s != 0)
- handle_error_en(s, "pthread_mutex_consistent");
- printf("[main thread] Mutex is now consistent; unlocking\\n");
+ handle_error_en(s, "pthread_mutex_consistent");
+ printf("[main thread] Mutex is now consistent; unlocking\\n");
s = pthread_mutex_unlock(&mtx);
if (s != 0)
- handle_error_en(s, "pthread_mutex_unlock");