Patch "sched/autogroup: Fix 64-bit kernel nice level adjustment" has been added to the 4.8-stable tree
From: <hidden>
Date: 2016-12-12 22:47:16
Also in:
stable
This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled
sched/autogroup: Fix 64-bit kernel nice level adjustment
to the 4.8-stable tree which can be found at:
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary
The filename of the patch is:
sched-autogroup-fix-64-bit-kernel-nice-level-adjustment.patch
and it can be found in the queue-4.8 subdirectory.
If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let [off-list ref] know about it.
From 83929cce95251cc77e5659bf493bd424ae0e7a67 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Mike Galbraith <redacted> Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2016 11:33:37 +0100 Subject: sched/autogroup: Fix 64-bit kernel nice level adjustment From: Mike Galbraith <redacted> commit 83929cce95251cc77e5659bf493bd424ae0e7a67 upstream. Michael Kerrisk reported:
Regarding the previous paragraph... My tests indicate that writing *any* value to the autogroup [nice priority level] file causes the task group to get a lower priority.
Because autogroup didn't call the then meaningless scale_load()... Autogroup nice level adjustment has been broken ever since load resolution was increased for 64-bit kernels. Use scale_load() to scale group weight. Michael Kerrisk tested this patch to fix the problem:
Applied and tested against 4.9-rc6 on an Intel u7 (4 cores). Test setup: Terminal window 1: running 40 CPU burner jobs Terminal window 2: running 40 CPU burner jobs Terminal window 1: running 1 CPU burner job Demonstrated that: * Writing "0" to the autogroup file for TW1 now causes no change to the rate at which the process on the terminal consume CPU. * Writing -20 to the autogroup file for TW1 caused those processes to get the lion's share of CPU while TW2 TW3 get a tiny amount. * Writing -20 to the autogroup files for TW1 and TW3 allowed the process on TW3 to get as much CPU as it was getting as when the autogroup nice values for both terminals were 0.
Reported-by: Michael Kerrisk <redacted> Tested-by: Michael Kerrisk <redacted> Signed-off-by: Mike Galbraith <redacted> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds-de/tnXTf+JLsfHDXvbKv3WD2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra-/NLkJaSkS4VmR6Xm/wNWPw@public.gmane.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <redacted> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <redacted> Cc: linux-man <redacted> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1479897217.4306.6.camel-Mmb7MZpHnFY@public.gmane.org Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <redacted> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <redacted> --- kernel/sched/auto_group.c | 4 +++- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- a/kernel/sched/auto_group.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/auto_group.c@@ -192,6 +192,7 @@ int proc_sched_autogroup_set_nice(struct { static unsigned long next = INITIAL_JIFFIES; struct autogroup *ag; + unsigned long shares; int err; if (nice < MIN_NICE || nice > MAX_NICE)
@@ -210,9 +211,10 @@ int proc_sched_autogroup_set_nice(struct next = HZ / 10 + jiffies; ag = autogroup_task_get(p); + shares = scale_load(sched_prio_to_weight[nice + 20]); down_write(&ag->lock); - err = sched_group_set_shares(ag->tg, sched_prio_to_weight[nice + 20]); + err = sched_group_set_shares(ag->tg, shares); if (!err) ag->nice = nice; up_write(&ag->lock);
Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from efault-Mmb7MZpHnFY@public.gmane.org are queue-4.8/sched-autogroup-fix-64-bit-kernel-nice-level-adjustment.patch -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-man" in the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html