Thread (37 messages) 37 messages, 9 authors, 2018-10-09

Re: [PATCH 07/11] UAPI: nilfs2: Fix use of undefined byteswapping functions

From: Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
Date: 2018-09-05 22:20:05
Also in: linux-api, linux-fsdevel, lkml

On Wed, Sep 05, 2018 at 04:55:23PM +0100, David Howells wrote:
 nilfs_checkpoint_set_##name(struct nilfs_checkpoint *cp)		\
 {									\
-	cp->cp_flags = cpu_to_le32(le32_to_cpu(cp->cp_flags) |		\
+	cp->cp_flags = __cpu_to_le32(__le32_to_cpu(cp->cp_flags) |	\
 				   (1UL << NILFS_CHECKPOINT_##flag));	\
How about sanitiziung the damn thing to
	cp->cp_flags |= __cpu_to_le32(1UL << NILFS_CHECKPOINT_##flag));

while you are at it?  Or, perhaps, even
#define NILFS2_CP_FLAG(flag) __cpu_to_le32(1UL << NILFS_CHECKPOINT_##flag)

and cp->cp_flags |= NILFS2_CP_FLAG(flag) for this one,
 }									\
 static inline void							\
 nilfs_checkpoint_clear_##name(struct nilfs_checkpoint *cp)		\
 {									\
-	cp->cp_flags = cpu_to_le32(le32_to_cpu(cp->cp_flags) &		\
+	cp->cp_flags = __cpu_to_le32(__le32_to_cpu(cp->cp_flags) &	\
 				   ~(1UL << NILFS_CHECKPOINT_##flag));	\
	cp->cp_flags &= ~NILFS2_CP_FLAG(flag);
here
 }									\
 static inline int							\
 nilfs_checkpoint_##name(const struct nilfs_checkpoint *cp)		\
 {									\
-	return !!(le32_to_cpu(cp->cp_flags) &				\
+	return !!(__le32_to_cpu(cp->cp_flags) &				\
 		  (1UL << NILFS_CHECKPOINT_##flag));			\
and !!(cp->cp_flags & NILFS2_CP_FLAG(flag)
here?  Or maybe even make the damn thing bool and lose the !! here...

)>  }
 
and similar for those:
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
@@ -595,20 +596,20 @@ enum {
 static inline void							\
 nilfs_segment_usage_set_##name(struct nilfs_segment_usage *su)		\
 {									\
-	su->su_flags = cpu_to_le32(le32_to_cpu(su->su_flags) |		\
+	su->su_flags = __cpu_to_le32(__le32_to_cpu(su->su_flags) |	\
 				   (1UL << NILFS_SEGMENT_USAGE_##flag));\
 }									\
 static inline void							\
 nilfs_segment_usage_clear_##name(struct nilfs_segment_usage *su)	\
 {									\
 	su->su_flags =							\
-		cpu_to_le32(le32_to_cpu(su->su_flags) &			\
+		__cpu_to_le32(__le32_to_cpu(su->su_flags) &		\
 			    ~(1UL << NILFS_SEGMENT_USAGE_##flag));      \
 }									\
 static inline int							\
 nilfs_segment_usage_##name(const struct nilfs_segment_usage *su)	\
 {									\
-	return !!(le32_to_cpu(su->su_flags) &				\
+	return !!(__le32_to_cpu(su->su_flags) &				\
 		  (1UL << NILFS_SEGMENT_USAGE_##flag));			\
 }

quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
@@ -619,15 +620,15 @@ NILFS_SEGMENT_USAGE_FNS(ERROR, error)
 static inline void
 nilfs_segment_usage_set_clean(struct nilfs_segment_usage *su)
 {
-	su->su_lastmod = cpu_to_le64(0);
-	su->su_nblocks = cpu_to_le32(0);
-	su->su_flags = cpu_to_le32(0);
+	su->su_lastmod = __cpu_to_le64(0);
+	su->su_nblocks = __cpu_to_le32(0);
+	su->su_flags = __cpu_to_le32(0);
 }
 
 static inline int
 nilfs_segment_usage_clean(const struct nilfs_segment_usage *su)
 {
-	return !le32_to_cpu(su->su_flags);
+	return !__le32_to_cpu(su->su_flags);
"Check that after byteswap it becomes 0", is it?  How is that different
from return !su->su_flags; ?
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help