# Re: \[PATCH v3 1/2\] crypto: use SM3 instead of SM3\_256

- From: Jarkko Sakkinen \<jarkko@kernel.org\>
- Date: 2021-10-28 06:44:23 
- List: linux-integrity
- Page: https://ratatoskr.run/linux-integrity/2021/10/1556490
- Thread: https://ratatoskr.run/linux-integrity/2021/10/1554028/t.md

```text
On Tue, Oct 26, 2021 at 03:56:25PM +0800, Tianjia Zhang wrote:
> According to https://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-oscca-cfrg-sm3-01.html,
> SM3 always produces a 256-bit hash value and there are no plans for
> other length development, so there is no ambiguity in the name of sm3.
> 
> Suggested-by: James Bottomley <redacted>
> Signed-off-by: Tianjia Zhang <redacted>

The commit message does not contain a description of what kind of code
change you're doing.

/Jarkko
```